this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2025
22 points (95.8% liked)

Movies

10044 readers
58 users here now

Lemmy

Welcome to Movies, a community for discussing movies, film news, box office, and more! We want this to be a place for members to feel safe to discuss and share everything they love about movies and movie related things. Please feel free to take part and help our community grow!


Related Communities:

!books@lemmy.world - Discussing books and book-related things.

!comicbooks@lemmy.world - A place to discuss comic books of all types.

!marvelstudios@lemmy.world - LW's home for all things MCU.


While posting and commenting in this community, you must abide by the Lemmy.World Terms of Service: https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

  1. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, or advocating violence will be removed.

  2. Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally insult others.

  3. Spam, self promotion, trolling, and bots are not allowed

  4. Shitposts and memes are allowed until they prove to be a problem.

    Regarding spoilers; Please put "(Spoilers)" in the title of your post if you anticipate spoilers, as we do not currently have a spoiler tag available. If your post contains an image that could be considered a spoiler, please mark the thread as NSFW so the image gets blurred. As far as how long to wait until the post is no longer a spoiler, please just use your best judgement. Everyone has a different idea on this, so we don't want to make any hard limits.

    Please use spoiler tags whenever commenting a spoiler in a non-spoiler thread. Most of the Lemmy clients don't support this but we want to get into the habit as clients will be supporting in the future.

Failure to follow these guidelines will result in your post/comment being removed and/or more severe actions. All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. We ask that the users report any comment or post that violates the rules, and to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I remember very little but it involved a guy who used a typewriter and had very surreal hallucinations. I've never seen it I just had it described to me. I think there might have been a talking horse in his bathroom? May have involved severe drug addiction

top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 16 points 3 days ago (2 children)
[–] Dirk@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 days ago

Came here to say that.

Here’s trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_bgrNm7rdeo

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I think it is this but I am not entirely certain. Will give it a watch though.

Edit: partly saying this because I would love more recommendations lol I am like 70% certain this is it

[–] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago

No horse in bathroom though.

Also, William S. Burroughs is the absolute GOAT in my opinion.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I…wait, do ALL of these movies have talking horses in bathrooms?!

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

God i hope so. I think I might have hallucinated the horse thing

[–] Panron@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Naked Lunch was my first thought, but, if not that, possibly Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas?

(I haven't seen either in many years; I don't recall anything about a talking horse, so am not very certain about either.)

[–] THB@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

This was going to be my guess*, but I'm not familiar with Naked Lunch

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago

Not fear and loathing in las vegas but that movie is on my list. I think it is Naked lunch tbh might have to call it solved. I am asking this based on a memory of a conversation I had years ago

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)
[–] j_elgato@leminal.space 1 points 2 days ago

"Sorry to Bother You”

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt5688932/

Was surreal, was a taking horse in a bathroom pertaining to a drug plot, but no addiction and no typewriter.

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Could be The Number 23 starring Jim Carrey, he used a typewriter and had surreal hallucinations and flashbacks. No talking horse I recall, but good movie.

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 2 days ago

Sorry to bother you

[–] supernicepojo@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Secret Window. Johnny depp stars with John Turturro Secret Window IMDb

[–] lordnikon@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

it sounds like you are talking about Slaughter House V

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Definitely not but this feels obscure and enjoyable

[–] lordnikon@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

well you got me, but let me know if you find it. it sounds interesting.

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Its naked lunch, looked more into it now that I am sober and its definitely naked lunch. No talking horse though

[–] lordnikon@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

awesome thanks

[–] Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone 1 points 3 days ago

Not the movie I imagine, but a beautiful mind is a great movie with a guy who has hallucinations

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 1 points 3 days ago
[–] forrgott 1 points 3 days ago
[–] bacon_pdp@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If it involved a red headed girlfriend.

Ruby Sparks (2012)

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 days ago

No but this does look good

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca -5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Chatgpt is often good at figuring these out

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago

Neither does chatgpt lol

[–] BluCypher@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Wow. You’re not wrong. Put the original post in ChatGPT and it spit this out…

Based on your description — a man using a typewriter, surreal hallucinations, drug addiction, and possibly a talking creature (maybe a horse) in the bathroom — the movie you’re thinking of is almost certainly:

🎥 Naked Lunch (1991)

Director: David Cronenberg Based on: The 1959 novel Naked Lunch by William S. Burroughs

🔍 Key Details That Match Your Clues: • Typewriter: The protagonist is a writer named William Lee, a clear stand-in for Burroughs. He uses a typewriter that transforms into talking, insectoid creatures. • Surreal hallucinations: The film is drenched in bizarre, grotesque, and surreal imagery, blending fantasy, addiction, and paranoia. Hallucinations dominate the narrative. • Drug addiction: The story is a heavily allegorical and autobiographical portrayal of Burroughs’ own heroin addiction, with bizarre substances like “bug powder” and “Mugwump jism” substituting for narcotics. • Talking creatures in strange places: There’s a famous scene with a talking insect-typewriter in the bathroom. While not exactly a horse, the strange, chattering creature may have been misremembered as one — not uncommon with secondhand descriptions of this film. • Style: Directed by David Cronenberg, known for body horror and psychological surrealism, the film mixes elements of Burroughs’ novel with aspects of his real life, including the tragic incident of him accidentally killing his wife.

Why It’s Easily Misremembered or Confused: • Naked Lunch is notoriously difficult to summarize, intentionally disjointed, and dripping with psychological and hallucinogenic themes. • The nonlinear plot and talking typewriters are commonly cited as the most memorable (and baffling) parts. • Even viewers who’ve seen the film often describe it as something they can’t quite explain — which fits your description well.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago

Yeah its good for fuzzy connections, its bad for absolute knowledge like programming. I mean it gets you close but leaves out major things or just makes shit up LOL