this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2025
54 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

51781 readers
504 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In terms of cost of an ad to earnings, and how well, even a targeted ad, can hold a viewer's attention. Have we just become numb to ads? Does targeted advertising actually yield better results?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Dirk@lemmy.ml 54 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Have we just become numb to ads?

Online I use multiple browser extensions and settings to avoid showing ads. In the offline world there is no way to avoid them but I think I pretty much can ignore them.

I also intentionally do not buy anything I remember seeing an ad for.

[–] wuphysics87@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 months ago

I'm the same way, but I end up buying something similar. Show me Wendy's and I'll eventually go to Burger King

[–] the_abecedarian@piefed.social 33 points 2 months ago

They are effective, but not usually by being convincing. Its usually through saturation so that the first brand that comes to mind when you do need a thing is the one that saturated your market.

Spon con and influencers are more convincing/creating a parasocial connection.

[–] reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net 29 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

In 2020 Freakonomics did a dive into the effectiveness of adverts. Link below (transcripts too). There are sources listed and such. My tl;dr based on memory is that ads in general are not very cost effective for most companies. Ads are very cost effective for companies that sell ads though.

[–] bluemoon@piefed.social 3 points 2 months ago

so just like crypto & AI: a ponzo scheme

[–] DrBob@lemmy.ca 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think ads are super effective for some demographics. Children are probably the best target market. Teenagers, particularly those who seek external validation or align to external norms are a sweet spot. Old guys like me? No effect whatsoever.

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Brand recognition is important. I have heard for many ads they don't care if you pay attention so long as you hear/see it briefly, because you will be more likely to pick their product later when it's the name you recognise even (especially) if you don't remember why you know it.

[–] DrBob@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

We sometimes play a game around here where we'll turn off the volume during a commercial and try to guess what they're advertising. It's harder than you might imagine for unfamiliar ads.

[–] bluemoon@piefed.social 2 points 2 months ago

so osmosis? kinda like the consensus people form from being on the internetverse - not knowing just where they picked a fact or perspective up from, but touting it as an obvious fact or perspective that everyone has

[–] littlelordfauntleroy@lemmy.zip 20 points 2 months ago

Ads were effective in that they caused me to stop watching tv soooo... 🀷

[–] jonathan7luke@lemmy.zip 15 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Any company that pays for ads closely tracks the efficacy of ads and can more or less prove that the ads are worth it. There's no guess work.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I guess they can't put metrics on word of mouth. I would say an outstanding product markets itself and is more effective than millions spent on ads

[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I would say an outstanding product markets itself

Of course an outstanding product will spread via word-of-mouth... but as it turns out, word-of-mouth only does so much. I wouldn't say word-of-mouth just "markets itself". You'll need some sort of critical mass before that really works out. There are plenty of good products out there that are not getting bought even if they're better than the competitor, because the competitor has better marketing.

[–] bluemoon@piefed.social 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

like modos, the open source e-ink kit with as fast refresh rates as LCD screens? on crowdsource right now

and as "open printer"? open source printer with refillable ink cartridges, no tracking shenanigans, a repairable design and possibility to just put a roll of paper (at most A3 in width) then letting it print bannerolls... crowdsource too iirc

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

For the average person immensely. Especially when you're not familiar with a field and just need something, you'll probably buy something you saw before. For example if you see Makita ads for power tools and you suddenly need to buy a power tool.

[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

As someone who owns Makita power tools, I feel personally attacked πŸ˜‚

[–] Fleur_@aussie.zone 12 points 2 months ago (3 children)

When was the last time you bought something you'd never heard of

[–] Sunsofold@lemmings.world 11 points 2 months ago (19 children)

As someone who uses ad blockers, almost every time i buy something. If i want something, I'll find it. I don't need marketing vermin telling me what I should want based on who gave them money. I also hate ads enough that i specifically avoid buying anything for which i have seen or heard an advertisement.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 months ago

Happens all the time

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago (4 children)

All the time. When I actually need something, then I'll go do a bit of research on different products based on feedback from friends, and what people online say, then use that to inform what I buy. I can't think of any product I bought because it was advertised to me.

[–] Horse@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I can’t think of any product I bought because it was advertised to me.

i can however think of a lot of products that i refuse to buy because the ads were that fucking annoying

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] pathwonder@kopitalk.net 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Super effective!

It's not so much that ads can only sell you something anymore. They're able to sell your personal details and identity when abused.

I believe the issue has been written on even prior to the 2025 article from Wired.

Data brokers are basically form centralized American platforms which carry immense databases about its users. These demographics can essentially be used to target high value targets. These can include government employees, members of military, and other persons of interest.

These brokers use Mobile IDs to allow advertisers to micro-target people with their habits, browsing fingerprint, and purchase habits. Even if these companies say they don't associate identities with these Mobile IDs, the brokers can cross-reference enough information to basically de-anonymize a target.

Plus with influencers these days, many don't disclose if what they do is sponsored or part of a greater outreach campaign. You're basically stuck wondering if you're getting targeted or astroturfed.

https://www.wired.com/story/google-dv360-banned-audience-segments-national-security/

[–] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

many dont disclose if what they do is sponsored

I assume they all are. If they say "OK so I just got and..." I immediately disregard anything they have to say.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] robber@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Given that Google generated more than 250 billion U.S. dollars in ad revenue in 2024, I'd say they must be pretty effective.

Source

[–] NONE_dc@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I believe that the revenue comes more from advertisers paying to advertise on Google than from people paying for the advertised products or services.

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

Those people wouldn't keep paying if they didn't find those ads effective. Not to mention there are methods to measure the efficacy of ads so they do know how well they work.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 months ago
[–] Saltarello@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

For me not at all. I'm old enough to research & shop for what I need rather than impulse buy. Tech wise I ~~dont~~ very rarely see any ads at all thanks to strong ad blocking & general privacy consciousness. I try to stick to open source only & fediverse is the only social media I use. For YouTube I never sign in to so I'm not affected by the algorithm & never see ads on it ever (channels I like are in a Joplin note synced between devices). Broadcast TV is recorded via HTPC & ads stripped before episodes are fed into Jellyfin.

I dont "get" influencers. Even back in the day I used to ask why celebrities always put their name to perfume/aftershave as I'd only buy what I liked the smell of regardless of the brand/name.

Yeah, I know I'm an outlier, even my mates take the piss.

I mean, you're not alone. I got so fed up with ads because it was always junk I needed but couldn't afford, or shit I already knew existed and had otherwise already acquired with satisfactory results. Not to mention ads following me around. I hated being haunted by a pair of sneakers across four websites.

It's not paranoia if you're right, dammit.

[–] mistermodal@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago

Ads are effective at communicating how other people will view your purchase

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Ads are extremely effective in aggregate though it's difficult to impossible to assign value to any individual ad. Targeted ads are popular because they are more directly attributable to purchases, but it's also likely that other ads led you towards that decision as well.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I must have no interests or needs, because I have never bought anything from an ad.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I actively avoid any product seen in ads. My friend down the street falls for every gimmicky TV ad.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago

Yeah, I had and have coworkers like that. One guy would have a router, then a new one would come out with claims of being faster so he'd buy that even though he was on ahitty low DSL at the time. I'm like dude your internet provider can't send it to you any quicker, so the next level 100 mbps to 1000mbps to 2.5gig Ethernet router isn't helping when you only have one computer and terrible download speed.

My other coworker buys every gadget, including shakeweights lol

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Not really. I have most of what I want and need. Now I just need to zero my debt, which ain't gonna happen soon. So I don't need new shit. I'm just hitting yard sales.

And none of that shit ever got me laid like they said it would.

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί