this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2025
595 points (99.0% liked)

Science Memes

17860 readers
661 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] KurtVonnegut@mander.xyz 41 points 1 month ago (1 children)

She's going to find out he is stuck on on his E^x

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 1 month ago
[–] PartySlices@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Reminds me of a fun joke!

A constant and e^x were walking down the street. They see a differentiator coming, and instantly the constant gets scared shitless. The differentiator comes up, and as expected, POOF, the constant is gone. e^x starts laughing and says "nice try, can't touch me". But the differentiator tips his hat and responds "is that right?", then throws off his coat and shows that he is d/dy.

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The result is 𝑦 = ⅟ₓ, right?

[–] Papergeist@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No e^x doesn't have a 'y' and so it also acts as a constant.

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Oh, I was thinking of it as 𝑦 = 𝑒^𝑥^ or 𝑥 = ln 𝑦, whose derivative in respect to 𝑦 is 𝑥 = 1/𝑦 (for 𝑦 > 0) or 𝑦 = 1/𝑥 (for 𝑥 > 0). Your interpretation is that the 𝑦-axis is non-existent or named differently, which is why I'd prefer the joke to say d/d𝑡 for less ambiguity, as @anothercatgirl suggested.

[–] anothercatgirl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

yayaya, or in other cases like multiple independent variables, I'm not sure because it's been 6 years since I took calculus

[–] MOCVD@mander.xyz 2 points 1 month ago

The general form would be implicit differentiation! d/dx dx/dy e^x = e^x dx/dy

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Nobody exp(x) the y-derivation!

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's nice to see memes like this and be surprised that I don't actually forget all of the calculus I ever learned

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 2 points 1 month ago

For me all that calculus I did has not been used in life ever afterwards. :)

[–] Illecors@lemmy.cafe 19 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Any explanation for the mathematically challenged?

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 44 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

She is derivation, a transform of functions that describes rate of 𝑓(𝑥) changing as 𝑥 changes. (This can be represented visually as the slope of the graph 𝑦 = 𝑓 (𝑥).) He is the exponential function 𝑒^𝑥^, which is the only* non-zero function whose derivative is itself - in other words, unaffected by derivation. The number 𝑒 is a constant (around 2.718) and the base of natural logarithms, hence the title.

* except its multiples such as −2 𝑒^𝑥^, which are... just... uh... derivative works

[–] Illecors@lemmy.cafe 6 points 1 month ago

Much appreciated!

[–] felsiq@piefed.zip 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

the only* non-zero function whose derivative is itself

* except its multiples such as −2 𝑒𝑥, which are... just... uh... derivative works

I think you forgot about e^x + 1, and e^x + 2, and … …

(My profs always dunked on me for forgetting the + c and I can’t resist doing it to someone else, I’m sorry)

For real tho, great explanation

[–] knomie@feddit.org 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

But the derivative of e^x+c is just e^x (which for c!=0 is not the same). That's why the +c is added during integrating because all +c is derived to 0 and thus indistinguishable.

[–] felsiq@piefed.zip 2 points 1 month ago

I wish I could say I commented this late at night or something, but nope I’m just dumb lmao thanks

[–] arschflugkoerper@feddit.org 18 points 1 month ago

The derivative of e^x is e^x

[–] ManeraKai@programming.dev 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] teft@piefed.social 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If you want to use exponents on the fediverse you have to enclose the entire exponent in carats like so without the spaces:

e ^ x ^

e^x^

[–] anothercatgirl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

how about derivative with respect to time instead of with respect to x?

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

 𝑒^𝑥^ has been around since the 17^th^ century and it hasn't changed since. Therefore, it's a constant with respect to time and gets unceremoniously derived to 0.

[–] NobodyElse@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

Well played!

very nicely said, I agree

[–] abbadon420@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Couldn't figure out how to do superscript. But you know I watch 3b1b. I'm not sure if this meme actually fits though.

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Here, have this:
𝑒ˣ
ᵈ⁄d𝑥

Even plain text textboxes can do fun stuff if there is good Unicode support

[–] sartalon@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

My favorite thing about Laplace and Fourier transforms was making a fabulous looking F and L.

Their functions are so fucking spectacularly useful, but I just loved writing it out.

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Mine too! I looked through all of Unicode and they don't have the awesome-looking L I know from college, only the "script" variant.

[–] teft@piefed.social 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Carats on both sides of the exponent so ^ x ^ but without the spaces. e^x^

[–] mat@jlai.lu 11 points 1 month ago
[–] Prontomomo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago