this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2025
234 points (97.6% liked)

News

36512 readers
2209 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

New research from Public Interest Research Group and tests conducted by NBC News found that a wide range of AI toys have loose guardrails.

A wave of AI-powered children's toys has hit shelves this holiday season, claiming to rely on sophisticated chatbots to animate interactive robots and stuffed animals that can converse with kids. 

Children have been conversing with stuffies and figurines that seemingly chat with them for years, like Furbies and Build-A-Bears. But connecting the toys to advanced artificial intelligence opens up new and unexpected possible interactions between kids and technology. 

In new research, experts warn that the AI technology powering these new toys is so novel and poorly tested that nobody knows how they may affect young children.

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zak@lemmy.world 24 points 3 months ago

Who could have predicted that hiring the lowest bidder to hook a teddy bear to an LLM wouldn't result in a good toy for kids?

[–] velindora@lemmy.cafe 20 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Well, they were made in China, So obviously Chinese AI. Which is no doubt trained to promote propaganda in children’s toys instead of just talking about cats and dogs. It’s important to brainwash children when they’re young. Just look at the Christian!

[–] P1nkman@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] velindora@lemmy.cafe 3 points 3 months ago

deep breath, well…

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Not entirely unexpected. Giving such a "toy" to a child to avoid interaction with the kid (which is probably the default reason) should be considered child abuse.

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

It's freaking heartbreaking how many parents seem to just want to "keep their kids busy" and be left alone.

Like, my homie, you didn't HAVE TO reproduce if your idea of parenting is "Here's a TenCent GPT plushie to poorly mimic human connection and an iPad because I'm just really into my career right now."

Our culture has been polluted by greedy interests to the point of failure.

No kid deserves to be abused like that. It's intellectually and emotionally akin to introducing them to cigarettes.

We're thrilled to be expecting, and don't take it for granted like so many seem to. This kid's gonna be read to by us human parents, gonna learn to use actual computers, appreciate vintage media, touch grass, draw/paint/sculpt for fun, and develop their own imagination.

iPads, cocomelon, genAI, and tiktok can go die forgotten in a ditch, along with these "AI toys."

[–] kossa@feddit.org 6 points 3 months ago

Save that comment and set a reminder to revisit it, when your kid is, idk, like three years old 😅

Let me tell you: every parent thinks they're going to be this awesome parent, not like aaaaaall the other bad parents out there.

Turns out: that battle plan does not survive first contact with your child. Every parent feels like they let their former self down in their aspiration of being a good parent.

Needless to say: it's not hard to skip shitty AI toys though.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Lol

Yet another example of the hastily built, ill-conceived "future" being foisted upon us by corporations that want to brand you as an "AI vegan" (so you're perceived as an extremist) if you're not fully into it.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I don't know how one can even avoid it? Especially if you work as white collar worker - it's injected in just about every application on the job. This is why I think the bubble is almost guaranteed - it's practically at the level of a spelling checker in that it's a commodity that certainly has its uses, but you still cannot rely on it, and there is seemingly little to distinguish the various options. Also, there seems to be a limit to the amount of data they can feed these models.

I think there is a business model to be had, but right now I'm getting very much the same kind of vibes we had just before the dot-com meltdown...just who is going to be paying out the kind of money that is implied by the current valuations of these companies? If the various players think they are going to be able to gouge the shit out of companies they got hooked on this slop, I would think most companies might flee to much cheaper, or even just host their own open source models instead. It doesn't take much.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Totally agree with all of this.

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] pishadoot@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 months ago

SHOE

THIS IS THE BATTLE OF YOUR LIFE

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 3 months ago

What could be amazing technology and an amazing era for all of us is gonna turn out to be the most self inflicted fuckup in all of recorded history.

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Y'know, I keep reading about this but what's the point? My kids talk to their stuffies anyway, and usually about way more interesting shit than the CCP. Imagination is wild.

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 5 points 3 months ago

Exactly. It's just another arm of the AI bubble forcibly reaching into a place it doesn't belong with haphazard and dangerous results.

[–] RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com 4 points 3 months ago

AI toys for children are powered by lemmy users?

[–] drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

At least it won't strangle your kids.

[–] thefluffiest@feddit.nl 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yet

It will once it considers your kid either too dumb or too smart to serve the Great Orange President

[–] Senseless@feddit.org 5 points 3 months ago

Not how I expected Chucky to become a thing, but okay.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 3 months ago

happy talking panda from family guy.

[–] ssfckdt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 months ago

I didnt know they had Gritty stuffed chatbots

[–] 6stringringer@lemmy.zip -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I only wanted some god dang Honey walnut shrimp & a few dumplings. All I got was a Mousey Tongue😹

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 1 points 3 months ago

Lol that sure was a...Great Leap.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world -3 points 3 months ago

The sex part they're a bit young for, but perhaps the Chinese Communist Party talking points have some merit. :D