this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2025
545 points (98.9% liked)

politics

26816 readers
2793 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Dulce Consuelo Diaz Morales was arrested on Sunday. ICE won’t release her despite extensive documentation of her citizenship, her attorneys told HuffPost.

A Maryland woman has spent days in immigration detention despite being a U.S. citizen with a valid birth certificate and other documentation


documents ICE claims aren't authentic, her attorneys told HuffPost Thursday. 

Dulce Consuelo Diaz Morales, 22, was born in Maryland and spent time in Mexico before coming back to the United States, Victoria Slatton, one of the attorneys working on her case, told HuffPost in a phone call Thursday. Slatton has worked to draw attention to Diaz Morales' case, including in several TikTok videos.

Shirley Elvirita, Diaz Morales' 17-year-old sister, told HuffPost over the phone Thursday night that she, her sister and their father were doing laundry in Baltimore on Sunday, and afterwards, the sisters went to pick up some Taco Bell. After getting back on the road, Shirley recalled, they were surrounded by several vehicles filled with law enforcement personnel, who pulled them over. Officers ignored Shirley's questions and took her sister "forcefully" into one of the vans. They told Shirley they would let her go -- but not her sister.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 159 points 5 days ago

Throwing US citizens in jail for days seems to be considered by Brett Kavanaugh as brief questioning where the individuals "may promptly go free after making clear to the immigration officers that they are U. S. citizens or otherwise legally in the United States". And this sort of stuff doesn't happen according to Kristi Noem.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 93 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Send this to everyone who says people have nothing to worry about if they're in the country legally

[–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 83 points 5 days ago (29 children)

She's wasn't even "in the country legally" she is a fucking natural born citizen. She committed the crime of brownness

load more comments (29 replies)
[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 14 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Hey, FreshParsnip, I'd just like to point out that JoeBigelow wasn't really contradicting your original comment (the one I'm replying to) but rather they were amplifying it. Their point was to emphasize the racism of ICE against her "crime of brownness."

Not only was she "in the country legally," she also has the further rights and responsibilities of being a citizen. For instance, she can vote for for President. Beyond that, being a birthright citizen, she can run for the office and BE President.

A "legal resident," according to federal statutes, is defined as a person who has met certain legal requirements and received papers entitling them to live here, but cannot legally vote, or serve on a jury, or some other rights reserved for citizens.

JoeBigelow could definitely have used better syntax, or stuck a "just" in there after "even".

And your original point, about ICE being a danger to everyone regardless of how many rights they're supposed to have, is perfect. They're fascist thugs.

But your anger is misdirected. Save it for the real enemy.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

And now you should minimize Joe's comment, because that thread is actively painful to read. This is a fine summary and all you want to know about that comment chain.

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 101 points 5 days ago

They went to Taco Bell. Clearly they were born here and not in Mexico.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 80 points 5 days ago (43 children)

“I kept shouting at them that she was from here, but they wouldn’t listen to me,” the younger sister recalled. Shirley said the stop and her sister’s arrest seemed like racial discrimination: “I showed them our identifications, and they didn’t pay me any attention, they went straight to my sister because she’s darker than me.”

This is what you voted for protest-non-voters.

[–] stephan262@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago (3 children)

I disagree. This is what protest-non-voters failed to vote against.

Saying that they voted for this is implying that it is what they wanted. It is not the same thing as not carefully considering the potential outcomes. I agree that they bear some responsibility for what's happening because of their failure to engage in the best course of action to prevent it. I do also think it is very much an inaccurate statement to say that it is what they voted for.

Put simply, intent matters. It doesn't matter if the material outcome is the same.

something tells me dulce consuela diaz morales wouldn't give a shit about their intents.

trust me, the history books will not care about anyone's intents either, just the material outcome they enabled.

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 4 points 4 days ago

“complicit” is the word

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago (2 children)

You're folding yourself into pretzels trying to reword this.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (42 replies)
[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 54 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

If they eat Taco Bell they must definitely be real Americans.

[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 42 points 5 days ago (1 children)

More claiming of fake birth certificates for people who aren't white enough. Same shit has been happening for people born along the Texas border, because only Latino people can lie about birth certificates apparently.

Trump did the same thing to Obama 17 years ago.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 25 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

~~Most Hispanics voted for this.~~
Almost half of Hispanics voted for this!

[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 17 points 5 days ago

Yea, I dont understand the political split. Democrats "claim" Hispanics, but Hispanics are conservative Catholics and against anything Pro Choice. Republicans are racist and dream of doing fascist stuff like this ... yet half the Hispanics voted for them.

Something something big cats .. something something face eating.

[–] Gloomy@mander.xyz 8 points 5 days ago (3 children)
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Corrected to almost half. Still insane that so many voted for Trump, and that Trump broke the Republican record for Latino votes!?!?

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 days ago

It doesn't if you know Latino culture, they like the manly man steretype that Trump somehow fostered by popping off bullshit.

[–] Avicenna@programming.dev 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

I mean 1/3 is still a crazy amount given he literally said he would be doing mass deportations if elected. People can never get enough of the "It won't happen to me" kool-aid

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 4 points 3 days ago

Fascist state doing fascist things. Is anyone surprised?

[–] BC_viper@lemmy.world 25 points 5 days ago (1 children)

There is only one acceptable state of an ice agent.

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 14 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Is it cold? Say it's cold.

[–] femtek@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] TheRealKuni@piefed.social 11 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

I can’t hear ya!

I say what’s, what’s cooler than being cool?

[–] InputZero@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Ice cold!

Alright, alright, alright, alright, alright, alright, okay now ladies. Now we gon' break this thing down in just a few seconds

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 18 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Everything in society is dependent on people doing what they are supposed to, to serve whatever role their place in that system is. When they can freely not do that, they do whatever they want, and then we stop having society because nobody serves the roles that are needed to have one. Then the authoritarians get annoyed people aren't doing whats needed for them to have a society to be in control of and start beating everyone into compliance. And they have to keep doing that because their system is shit and nobody wants it that way but them.

[–] immutable@lemmy.zip 16 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

This is why people get confused, because they think authoritarianism is some strong man saying “you can’t do this, you can’t do that”

There’s a quote about how authoritarianism isnt someone saying “you can’t” but instead it’s someone saying “you may”

  • You may ignore this law
  • You may jail these people
  • You may disregard due process

That’s the real danger, when rights and law are replaced with the whims and favor of a despot.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago

Those inbred fucks wouldn't know a fake one

load more comments
view more: next ›