this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2025
54 points (98.2% liked)

No Stupid Questions

44903 readers
437 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Flying in Europe, it is about a 50/50 chance as to whether you get on the plane from a jet bridge or you take a bus to the plane parked on the tarmac. In contrast, most US airports have jet bridges, even when the plane is small unless it is a very small airport.

Why?

top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bomberesque@lemmy.world 7 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

A lot of budget Airlines (in Europe: Ryanair, EasyJet etc) try to cut costs of airport service and one way they do that is to accept bus transport or walk out to board.

[–] RoidingOldMan@lemmy.world 56 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Land availability. European cities have been occupied for way longer, so there is a lot lower chance of some huge unused space for a massive airport. Smaller airports are more likely to have you board/unboard on the tarmac. Denver airport is more than 10x the size of the biggest airport in all of Europe. It's also bigger than Zurich, the whole city is smaller than the Denver airport.

[–] Suck_on_my_Presence@lemmy.world 12 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

No way!? That's insane. Wow. Wow. Thanks for this fact

[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 12 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Denver is the second largest airport in the world after Dammam, Saudi Arabia, which doesn't even seem to use much of its enormous amount of land from a quick look.

Denver's airport is relatively new, was built way outside of town before the city really had a chance to grow into it, and is about twice the size of Manhattan.

[–] Suck_on_my_Presence@lemmy.world 7 points 8 hours ago

I guess it really earns that murderhorse

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Most American airports are space constrained, including many of the oldest ones in the country. The old airports in the US generally use jet bridges even when they are constrained by space.

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 minutes ago

Jet bridges are also an access control system. It’s harder to wander off to another part of the tarmac if you can’t get to it in the first place.

It’s also probably cheaper to guard too, since locked doors and alarms don’t require healthcare, and you can push that duty off to flight attendants and gate employees.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 10 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe something to do with ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) compliance? Europe tolerates a lot less accessibility by necessity since they have so many older buildings, so maybe that translates over into having more tolerance for stairs when boarding planes?

[–] starlinguk@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

"Europe" has different laws in different countries. The UK is incredibly keen on accessibility, but Germany is ablist as hell, for instance.

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 16 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

Jet bridges only work with airplanes above a certain size, such as Boeing 737 and above. Airports that also serve smaller aircraft need to have infrastructure in place to board from the apron, and once that infrastructure is in place it can be used for both big and small aircraft.

Boarding from the apron is a lot more flexible as it's basically a matter of getting the aircraft onto any available parking spot, and then shuttle passengers to and from the aircraft. So delayed flights are more likely to use one of these spots, as the Jet bridge schedule requires a lot of planning.

While the above probably isn't a root cause, it's definitely a factor.

Source: Frequent flyer, on both big and small aircraft.

[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Nah, I worked at an airport that only has CRJs and we had a jet bridge. I've even boarded Saab 340s from them. There are some differences like a little bridge instead of direct connection, and they can't use the jet bridge's auto-level feature (as the plane gets loaded and unloaded it slowly sinks/rises not unlike what a car would do; auto-level has a stick with a wheel to track that and move the jet bridge to match) but other than that it's pretty seamless.

Ok, there is a limit and you probably couldn't use a jet bridge on, say, a Cessna Caravan... But the minimum is most definitely not a mainline plane.

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

How about a dash 8? They're pretty common around here, and I'm having a hard time imagining how one would connect a jet bridge to them.

[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 1 points 54 minutes ago (1 children)

I've only been on a Dash 8 a few times, but I think I've boarded one from a jet bridge once?

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 1 points 42 minutes ago* (last edited 41 minutes ago)

My local airport is exclusively serviced by DH Dash8, so it obviously doesn't have a jet bridge.
However, my regional airport (ENGM) has all sizes, and the smaller ones have their own area at the very end of terminal A so that passengers can walk to the smaller aircraft out of one out of 6 boarding gates, across clearly marked paths on the apron, and onto the smaller aircrafts.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 9 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I've taken jet bridges to board Embraer 175's in the USA. In contrast, I've gone up stairs for an Airbus A321 in Europe.

[–] Vikthor@piefed.world 1 points 4 hours ago

That's nothing, I have been deplaned to a bus from a bloody A380. Almost missed my connection. In Dubai.

[–] iamericandre@lemmy.world 10 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

All I can add is a personal anecdote but most of the smaller regional airports I have ever flown through have boarded from the tarmac vs a jet bridge.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 1 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah, but I've taken the bus to the airplane at major airports in the EU including Frankfurt. In contrast, the airports in the US that I've had to board on stairs are much smaller.

[–] Moolam@hilariouschaos.com 1 points 4 hours ago

Really depends on the airline. Lufthansa will rarely send you on a bus. But the answer is because they don't have enough gates for all the planes.

[–] iamericandre@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago

Oh yeah I’ve never taken a bus to the plane before

[–] ClownStatue@piefed.social 4 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Until recently, La Guardia in NY, and Philly airports had pretty regular busses to commuter jets (Embrairs, Canadians, Bombardier, etc). Philly still busses between terminals. I think DCA does as well. Not sure about others. I used to go through LGA, PHL, & DCA pretty often. The CLT (have to include “the”) also has a lot of outdoor boarding from terminal E (the commuter terminal).

So, in the US, you see busses more in larger airports that are more land-constrained for terminal space. Beyond this, you’re getting into small regional airports when you see more outdoor boarding. As to why, it’s probably just in response to expectations of US air passengers.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 3 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Buses between terminals is a lot more common and I've even seen buses acting as airplanes in the USA.

I can see some US airports using bussing, but it feels like the practice is far more commonplace in the EU than the US. It is also odd given than EU airports appear to be newer on average to US airports.

[–] Cevilia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 8 hours ago

buses acting as airplanes in the USA

I've heard of buses acting as trains (rail replacement service) but imagine being told your airplane is cancelled and you'll get a replacement bus service

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 8 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

seen buses acting as airplanes in the USA

Them Duke boys are at it again

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago

I love that reference :)

[–] RagnarokOnline@programming.dev 4 points 12 hours ago

This is a great question and I wanna know too. The first time I set foot on a tarmac was probably when I was 22, and I had flown dozens of times before then.

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca -2 points 10 hours ago

The reason for this is that a lot less people care about planes in Europe when you have an amazing high speed rail network that bankrupts Airlines all over the region.

[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org -2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

I guess it's mainly for convenience. Americans demand much more convenience, and complain loudly about the smallest things.