205
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net 76 points 9 months ago

It's always comforting to know that I'm smarter than the richest man in the world

[-] AcidSmiley@hexbear.net 29 points 9 months ago

he's defintiely not the richest anymore tho

[-] TheBroodian@hexbear.net 39 points 9 months ago

absolutely the most divorced, though

[-] mayo_cider@hexbear.net 71 points 9 months ago

Rome was started by a wolf with huge titties

[-] operacion_ogro@hexbear.net 61 points 9 months ago

I sometimes wonder if perhaps Rome was founded by two dudes who absolutely drank wolf milk

[-] usernamesaredifficul@hexbear.net 41 points 9 months ago

I sometimes wonder if those dudes were the sons of mars

[-] zifnab25@hexbear.net 21 points 9 months ago

Okay, but here me out. What if all the soldiers of Thebes (the kinda coolish Greek one, not the hella coolish Egyptian one) were just the teeth of dragons, and they fought one another until only the strongest survived, and then those survivors became a middling city state that still got Spartans to STFU about being based at long last?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Parsani@hexbear.net 27 points 9 months ago

The Rome is stored in the wolf

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] muddi@hexbear.net 59 points 9 months ago

ngl that would be a funny bit if Musk started a whole ass Twitter thread rephrasing the entirety of the Aeneid in his usual raving manner, screeching about weapons and some dude from Troy

[-] StalinIsMaiWaifu@lemmygrad.ml 28 points 9 months ago

Is Grimes Dido in this narrative?

[-] GrumpigPoopBalls@hexbear.net 21 points 9 months ago

Dido

this brings back memories of the time i had to read a few paragraphs of the aeneid aloud in 7th grade but my friend changed Dido to Dildo with a pencil while i was reading and i got in trouble for laughing.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Philosoraptor@hexbear.net 55 points 9 months ago

Rome is on an incredibly good spot for a settlement, and has probably been occupied constantly ever since there have been people in the area. It was almost certainly not "founded" by anyone. This is your brain on Great Man ideology.

[-] ProxyTheAwesome@hexbear.net 49 points 9 months ago

Very few cities have an explicit founder unless they're relatively modern. The vast majority of settlements throughout human history just built up in good locations on their own. You're completely right, the conservative/liberal mind seems to be incapable of comprehending groups of people doing something on their own. They have to have a brilliant leader who told them to build a city.

[-] Philosoraptor@hexbear.net 32 points 9 months ago

They have to have a brilliant leader

(almost no women)

[-] FALGSConaut@hexbear.net 31 points 9 months ago

I think it comes from north america brain/settler brain, where settlers roll in, kill/replace the original inhabitants who were living there for millennia, and "found" a "new" settlement that you can assign a founder to. Then you export that way of thought to places where it has no basis in reality and you end up with roman statue avatar twitter guys (and musk apparently) actually believing that cities that have existed since cities began could have singular founding figures and didn't organically emerge because it's a good place to settle down

[-] KobaCumTribute@hexbear.net 23 points 9 months ago

One of the funniest things here is that unlike heavily mythologized figures like Gilgamesh or various biblical leaders Rome's legendary founder isn't even believed to have existed at all. Like they didn't just make up stories about some old king, he was just invented and named after the city relatively late in its existence. It'd be like if America's civic cult developed to the point that "Uncle Sam" was written into the historical record as a literal demigod who built Jamestown by himself and led a bloody crusade across the continent before writing the constitution himself.

[-] CatoPosting@hexbear.net 23 points 9 months ago

Iirc, we even have evidence of wars fought between the inhabitants of the different hills of rome, implying that it is such a good place for a settlement that multiple groups settled there before growing too large to be supported by the resources available on their hill alone.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] usernamesaredifficul@hexbear.net 31 points 9 months ago

well someone founded it but Rome wasn't built in a day

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Teekeeus@hexbear.net 27 points 9 months ago

if rome is in such a good spot then why is it surrounded by it*lians? checkmate commies

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SteamedHamberder@hexbear.net 51 points 9 months ago

One could simply enter a walled city by concealing soldiers in a gigantic, hollow wooden horse! I wonder if this was ever attempted by the ancient Greeks?

[-] ThomasMuentzner@hexbear.net 43 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

maybe the Persians where conquered by a Macedonian Army . They had the Phalanx at that time it could have been very effective against the Persians.. Archemidic Perisa did go under in 330 , maybe theres a conection..

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Crowtee_Robot@hexbear.net 37 points 9 months ago

He definitely has a folder on his computer labeled "NOT VIDEOS OF ME DRINKING WOLF MILK"

[-] spacecadet@hexbear.net 36 points 9 months ago

Wondering if this is because that meme that went around about how some (white) men think about Rome at least once a day. Probably felt he was missing out so vomited up this nonsense.

[-] Fishroot@hexbear.net 34 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Wondering if this is because that meme that went around about how some (white) men think about Rome

you are a Visigoth auxiliary in the Roman Gaul. the year is 452AD, you have received grim news about the bleeding on the Catalaunian plains . As you are on your daily patrol, the ground starts to tremble,

you are going to die

[-] Mardoniush@hexbear.net 34 points 9 months ago

There is some evidence of sub-mycenean/Luwian settlements in Apulia, which may be the core of the myth. But thinking something invented by Virgil 1500 years later is literally true is bizarre

[-] autismdragon@hexbear.net 29 points 9 months ago

To think you're the first person to think of it is even weirder lol.

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 35 points 9 months ago

Techbro culture's ruling class is absolutely full of "history is bunk" smuglords that repeat history in a blind stumbling way and call themselves genius pioneers.

[-] KobaCumTribute@hexbear.net 22 points 9 months ago

What do you mean? Jumping to spurious conclusions based on gut feelings and vague word associations is definitely a valid methodology that certainly doesn't rehash word for word the exact same random theories by anglo aristocrat failsons in the 19th century when they took time off their phrenology blogging to go look at a collection of looted artifacts/contemporary forgeries.

[-] marxisthayaca@hexbear.net 24 points 9 months ago

well they are the idiots inventing "worse version of a bus system" and calling it a startup.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] TheDialectic@hexbear.net 34 points 9 months ago

Really makes you think what a couple of feral kids raised by wolves could bring to democracy today.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Fishroot@hexbear.net 33 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

CEO saying to a board: "we need an innovative idea, because we need something new." moment

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 32 points 9 months ago

"What if we virtualized all the hardware and put it on the cloud, then took our product and put it on the blockchain?"

galaxy-brain receives endless accolades and money

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] flan@hexbear.net 28 points 9 months ago

can youtube ban history youtubers already

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Tofu_Lewis@hexbear.net 26 points 9 months ago

Dawg we tried meritocracy, it was called Confucianism and the Imperial Test.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Barabas@hexbear.net 25 points 9 months ago

I'm willing to bet that there was more than one occasion of competent soldiers who were mostly men to land on the Italian peninsula during all of Antiquity.

[-] Dolores@hexbear.net 23 points 9 months ago

imagining a classical roman rejecting the aeneid on the basis the trojans couldnt have been men if they lost to the greeks thinking-about-it

[-] tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 9 months ago

Wtf lol, where does he think the name 'Rome' comes from? Romulus is rolling in his grave.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2023
205 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13321 readers
1158 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS