this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2026
185 points (99.5% liked)
News
36399 readers
1975 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
that's almost 9001!
Missing a few digits there, veggie boi.
It's technically correct, which is the best kind of correct.
It still wouldn't matter. That old bastard is gonna die without suffering any consequences. It's enough to make me wish I was religious so I could believe he was going to hell.
If there is a god he'll give trump locked in syndrome for a few years first.
Any smoking guns? Otherwise it's kind of a moot point.
With 1 million references, I'm sure you could find a quote comparing him to a duck
Would that be a coot point?
What the fuck? Are you serious?
Can we stop being fucking idiots one day, everyone? Can we admit 100 times is unspeakable?
You might want to take a step back and re-read what you replied to. The person isn't saying that THEY won't believe Trump is a pedophile who should be in jail. The person is saying that the past 5 years have shown that nobody with any power to do anything is willing to go after Trump even when there is direct evidence of him admitting to the crime on tape.
If there's no actionable evidence then he has plausible deniability. I agree having any contact with JE should be completely taboo but that doesn't hold in a court of law.
How many "coincidences" would be enough to convince you or any reasonable adult? Imagine a guy leaving the scene of 100 different murders - no actionable evidence. Coincidence?
I think the point is that that you don't have to convince a reasonable adult, you have to feasibly be able to prove it in court while staying within the confines of the law. How we feel about information doesn't always correlate with how things fit into the rules and sometimes that can be very unfortunate.
It's not about convincing a reasonable adult. This wouldn't be a normal court trial. Have you not paid attention the last 5 years?
This is not only about getting a prosecutor willing to take on a judge appointed by Trump, then convincing entirely unreasonable adults who are Trump supporters, then getting it through the appeals process with judges appointed by Trump, then getting it through the Supreme Court that was mostly appointed by Trump.
I'm not the one that needs to be convinced. I'm already convinced. But I've seen the evidence that is published today and there are many out there who have not or refuse to believe it. What we're talking about is prosecution, the people you need to convince are our lawmakers and judges.