this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2026
553 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

81532 readers
5552 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 minutes ago

"AI businesses are putting profits over sanity and safety".

Remove "AI" from that sentence and you'll see that's just more normal business practices that have been going on for decades.

[–] vane@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

After $1T poured into global warming, why can't AI replace them ?

[–] nosuchanon@lemmy.world 29 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] jeffep@lemmy.world 15 points 6 hours ago

Now what does that tell us about the sanity and safety?

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 14 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

This is many companies right now.

Mine is run from the top down (all executives) by people who use LLM's for fucking everything.

Everyone fucking hates them at this point. We all think they are fucking trash.

[–] ViceroTempus@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago

Maybe it's time to grab some fellow employees and make an employee owned business.

[–] Mondoshawan@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 hours ago

What industry is your company in?

[–] herseycokguzelolacak@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 hours ago

They are leaving because they are getting much better offers elsewhere.

[–] fubarx@lemmy.world 9 points 11 hours ago
[–] Etterra@discuss.online 20 points 14 hours ago

Just vibe code the AI. I'm sure it'll work perfectly.

[–] myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip 28 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

That’s just every company isn’t it?

[–] 123@programming.dev 7 points 14 hours ago

Not in my experience. Once their clients budgets get cut by funding cuts due to reality and they notice it doesn't do anything of benefit (on the clients side), they will be all "client first".

[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 120 points 20 hours ago (24 children)

And it's not even working. Not one of the AI companies is profitable. So they're putting the hope for profits some time in the future over sanity and safety.

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 3 points 5 hours ago

I don't think they even care about profits anymore.

Billionaires live in the balance sheet, not the P/L statements.

[–] ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] ishartdoritos@lemmy.zip 7 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Midjourney are the worse of the worse when it comes specifically training on stolen work from artists who dedicated their lives to it. They opened the floodgates to what we see now with mass theft of content by not getting sued into oblivion. Fuck them and their creepy little fuck face of a CEO.

[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

They're also not providing a large language model, so they actually did have a path to profitability. It's keeping LLMs updated and running that costs so much money that companies trying to do so are losing billions, and Midjourney doesn't have that problem.

It's just that their path to profitability was built on plagiarism on an astonishing scale. You're spot on, they should have been utterly destroyed right at the start.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 75 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Steve Burke (of GN) described the absurdity pretty well, within the context of the currently uncertain Nvidia and OpenAI deal:

Nvidia offered OpenAI $100B in investment, money that it didn't have, as long as OpenAI gave that money back to Nvidia to lease GPUs that haven't been made, to then put in data centres that haven't been constructed, which will be powered by electricity that hasn't come online, to then rent to users who haven't subscribed, to provide them features that haven't come to fruition.

[–] teft@piefed.social 21 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

And hope you’ve propped up the economy enough by the end of it that the government has to ~~bail you out~~…sorry i meant provide a “backstop”.

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] XLE@piefed.social 51 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

If anybody leaves an AI company with a fat paycheck, promises to "be honest about the real problems," and then proceeds to regurgitate things the AI company CEOs say: be suspicious.

Exhibit A is Anthropic millionaire Mrinank Sharma, who only mentioned (future) peril from AI and AI-made bioweapons, two fictional scenarios on the short list that Anthropic officially endorses. It's a list of things that please Anthropic investors.

Real-world stuff like AI psychosis, poisoning people's air, or generating CSAM doesn't get a mention from him. There's no profit in acknowledging those things, so he won't.

[–] melfie@lemy.lol 12 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe Claude Code learned this from its creators: I’ve noticed that when it says “the real issue is…”, that means it has no clue and is about barf out a bunch of slop that I’m going to have to revert.

[–] Repelle@lemmy.world 9 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

The only time it ever says “the real issue is” and is right is when I’ve just corrected it and told it the real issue which it then wastes tokens regurgitating back to me. Gods I miss not having to use this crap at work

[–] spacer@programming.dev 7 points 15 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Repelle@lemmy.world 7 points 15 hours ago

Yes, our usage is tracked. Managers have statistics broken down by daily usage per agent

[–] treesapx@lemmy.world 6 points 15 hours ago

Yup. Lots of managers are forcing people to use AI so they can report doing so in their metrics.

[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 72 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (5 children)

AI businesses are putting profits over sanity and safety.

All businesses are. That's what a business is. A legal entity that seeks to extract as much wealth from people as possible. They put profits before people as a matter of policy.

Limited liability corporations should be outlawed.

[–] iamthetot@piefed.ca 15 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

That's not what business is inherently; that's what capitalism is.

[–] fafferlicious@lemmy.world 8 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

It's not even strictly what capitalism is about. It's some stupid bullshit interpretation that came out of the University of Chicago economics department.

Seriously, go look at Adam Smiths wealth of nations. The only mention of the "invisible hand" is so different from what is taught in economics now

… by directing that industry in such a manner as its produce may be of the greatest value, he intends only his own gain, and he is in this, as in many other cases, led by an invisible hand to promote an end which was no part of his intention.

It's not that we need no regulation. It's just trying to say that if we set things up correctly, we don't need to worry about people pursuing SOLELY their own personal gain. Because the market seeks out the "greatest value", which is not just about money. It's also the value to society as a whole.

Instead, we got the fucking bullshit from Chicago saying that the only / best way of measuring value is by profit.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] dustyvagina@lemmy.zip 4 points 12 hours ago

We're so cooked

[–] shirro@aussie.zone 9 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Every company does that. The difference is the AI companies will be broke soon and laying off all their staff so people are getting out before the collapse.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 6 points 15 hours ago

Exactly. And some of them are rats fleeing a sinking ship. Just look at Mrinank Sharma, who got paid a million bucks or so for a year at Anthropic, then ditched.

[–] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 9 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Oh thank heavens some people still have ethics.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 12 points 17 hours ago

🌎 👨‍🚀 🔫 👨‍🚀

[–] Coyote_sly@lemmy.world 14 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

There's a huge list of eye rolls here but also...what profits?

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 6 points 16 hours ago

Talents leave

Tell me a "journalist" has no concept of mass nouns without using those words.

[–] HexParte@lemmy.zip 17 points 20 hours ago (4 children)

Just another day in corporate America. Putting fake profits over employees’s well-beings, and customer safety and privacy.

The thing that gets me is they just want to get in on this $2Billion investment that keeps changing hands without changing hands. They really are just taking IOUs from… elsewhere? Because apparently, according to Jensen, that money hasn’t actually exchanged hands. Investors are just buying into the new Ponzi Scheme.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 13 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

"They are putting profits over sanity and safety"

Soooooooo, just like every other business in the history of capitolism?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] suicidaleggroll@lemmy.world 7 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Publicly traded companies are legally required to put profits over sanity, safety, and everything else. It's a truly insane system we've put together for ourselves.

[–] ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip 0 points 5 hours ago

Interestingly they are not. Its commonly shilled by C-scum, but it's a lie.

load more comments
view more: next ›