this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2026
89 points (75.4% liked)

Fediverse

40909 readers
161 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, Mbin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Cross posted here as it was highlighted that the individual is a lead Lemmy developer, raising serious concerns about the direction of Lemmy, a leading Fediverse platform, and the impact on future user adoption.

Hi

There have been some rather concerning actions taken by an admin of the !privacy@lemmy.ml community, dessalines@lemmy.ml. Based on recent moderation decisions and a complete lack of communication, it seems like their account may have been compromised, or even more concerning if these actions are deliberate.

  1. Erroneous Rule 4 Enforcement, First Instance: a guide posted to !privacy@lemmy.ml, despite receiving many positive votes and comments, was removed under Rule 4:

If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered

However, this post was a guide and not a question, so Rule 4 does not apply. Attempts were made to reach out for clarification but there has been no response, despite their account showing recent activity.

  1. Erroneous Rule 4 Enforcement, Second Instance: an on-topic informational video also posted to !privacy@lemmy.ml, despite also receiving many positive votes, was again removed under Rule 4. This post was again not asking a question, so again Rule 4 does not apply. Again, no explanation has been given.

  2. User Bans in Completely Unrelated Communities: user bans of over a month have been applied for not only !privacy@lemmy.ml but several completely unrelated communities:

This is especially concerning given that the above posts have no relation to these communities, and no recent activity has been made in any of them, meaning none of their rules could have been broken. Moreover, a public track record of positive contributions across Lemmy has been established, with many positive votes and comments received over a sustained period. Given all of this, the bans appear to be highly disproportionate, only adding to the growing concerns around moderation practices.

  1. Repost with Disclaimer Removed: a repost of the guide, despite a disclaimer explaining the original removal appears to be in error and that attempts to contact the admin have failed, despite again receiving many positive votes and constructive comments, was once again removed. Again, no explanation has been given.

Given all of this, it’s hard to avoid the conclusion that something is not right. Mistakes in moderation happen but the complete lack of communication, the disproportionate actions, and the ongoing bans from unrelated communities raise serious concerns. It seems as though the account is most likely compromised, or even more concerning if these actions are deliberate.

Has anyone else experienced similar issues with this admin, or does anyone have more insight into what might be happening?

TL;DR: Admin dessalines@lemmy.ml of !privacy@lemmy.ml appears to be making seriously concerning moderation decisions, including erroneous enforcement of Rule 4 in at least two separate instances, failing to respond to messages, and applying user bans in completely unrelated communities despite a long track record of positive contributions across Lemmy. This has led to speculation that their account is likely compromised, or even more concerning if these actions are deliberate.

Any thoughts or similar experiences would be appreciated.

Cross post with https://lemmy.world/post/43944126

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] owenfromcanada@lemmy.ca 127 points 4 days ago (2 children)

4511

dessalines is known for questionable moderation. Avoid the .ml communities when possible.

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] goferking0 0 points 2 days ago

piefed is the way

Piefed is just as bad and is designed to mimic the worst parts of reddit

[–] flamingos@feddit.uk 66 points 4 days ago (2 children)

You were instance banned under lemmy.ml's rule 4, not the privacy community's rule 4. ml's rule 4 is "No Ads / Spamming". This seems to have been prompted by you reposting a removed post, which frankly seems fair despite what I think of ml's moderation normally.

Rule 4 does seem to be a bad reason to remove the original post, though I think it should've been removed simply for how cringe 'cuckloading' is as a term. Stop trying to link sexual deviancy to moral deficiency.

[–] orgrinrt@lemmy.world 33 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Just jumping in to boost this message, posting your own videos is advertising your channel, probably fine if one and done, but consistently I’d consider it advertising or spamming too. Even if not own videos, just persistently posting videos is bad etiquette and I can see how that’d be construed as spamming too.

This op is cringe either way. “This moderator’s account has been compromised! No other way to explain them enforcing the instance rule 4 after consistently spamming the communities with my videos!”… Jesus christ.

[–] autonomoususer@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

Thanks for the analysis but there is no indication that any video was posted more than once or that the creator is a Lemmy user.

[–] autonomoususer@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

Thanks for sharing this, really appreciate the clarity. Honestly, the interface, which they themselves created, doesn’t exactly make it obvious. You’re absolutely right that the original post doesn’t fall under that rule 4 either. And while I can’t say your sentiment on its content is unreasonable, removing the whole post, despite the constructive comments that were being left, doesn’t actually change the minds of the overwhelming number of users who left positive votes on both occasions.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 89 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

This is literally how he always acts. There's a reason that many instances do not federate with lemmy.ml, his instance.

He's incredibly pro communist, pro Russia, pro China, and will ban you for even mentioning that something could be foreign propaganda.

At the end of the day, hopefully your instance builds their server code from source and inspects it to make sure there's nothing nefarious. It would be nice to use a decentralized Reddit like platform not coded by him, but no one else has the time, resources, ability, and/or dedication, to step up.

I would still rather use Lemmy over Reddit, though I did switch to donating to piefed, the Canadian instance runners, over donating to him.

[–] scytale@piefed.zip 48 points 4 days ago (4 children)

It would be nice to use a decentralized Reddit like platform not coded by him, but no one else has the time, resources, ability, and/or dedication, to step up.

You literally mentioned piefed in your next sentence.

[–] mrmaplebar@fedia.io 37 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Mbin also exists...

Also, to be fair, the software isn't necessarily problematic like the moderation is. No point throwing the baby out with the bath water.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Worth noting that Lemmy receives at least some institutional funding for its development. And I believe some of that funding is contingent on hitting active user goals or similar metrics.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 3 points 2 days ago

Where does that funding come from?

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 7 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Power tripping people rarely limit themselves to power trip on a single angle.

And while Lemmy's open source, it's a big enough codebase for someone to add a bit of admin override that can go unnoticed for quite a while. Just remember what happened with xz.

[–] mrmaplebar@fedia.io 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Sure, but we allow people to power trip by giving them power in the first place. People choose to use Lemmy and participate in lemmy.ml, directly or indirectly; that gives the maintainers and admins power.

Now, I don't see eye to eye with the tankie crowd. That's fine, whatever. But I can still appreciate the creation of Lemmy as an open software project.

Ultimately FOSS gives us agency. I don't feel that the creators of Lemmy have any power over me personally. They're not very significant, but I do appreciate their project.

[–] greybeard@feddit.online 5 points 3 days ago

I moved onto piefed when the lemmy instance I was on shut down, and I don't regret it at all. It's a solid choice and promotes options in the threadiverse.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Zangoose@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago (10 children)

Tbf Piefed also does have opinionated moderation literally hardcoded into the source code.

It's pretty easy to modify since it's python and not rust, but still not great

[–] admin@scrapetacular.ydns.eu 11 points 4 days ago

In b4 discussion of what constitutes hardcoding

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Die4Ever@retrolemmy.com 23 points 4 days ago

It would be nice to use a decentralized Reddit like platform not coded by him, but no one else has the time, resources, ability, and/or dedication, to step up.

piefed, the Canadian instance runners

PieFed and Mbin don't share any code with Lemmy at all, they're in totally different programming languages

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 10 points 4 days ago

Piefed isn't the canadian instance runners, you're thinking of fedecan

[–] apftwb@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Hey its me, the real dessalines.

Can I have some money.

[–] ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip 31 points 4 days ago

For every Lemmy.ml community you're subscribed to, search for a non-lemmy.ml alternative. Almost every one has an alternative now. Subscribe to the new one, unsubscribe from the old, and never look back. This kind of heavy handed and/or opinionated moderation is the status quo there.

[–] oce@jlai.lu 64 points 4 days ago

You have been a user for 3 years at least, surely you have heard about the tankie situation on Lemmy? If you don't share these views it's better to ignore/block those three or four instances. It will make your Lemmy experience much more relaxing. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tankie

[–] Areldyb@lemmy.world 39 points 4 days ago

This is not evidence of account compromise, whatever you may think of dessalines' moderation decisions.

[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 42 points 4 days ago

He didn't have his account hacked.

[–] realitaetsverlust@piefed.zip 37 points 4 days ago

Lmao no. That guy is just a fucking nutjob. It's nothing new really. The only thing compromised is his brain really.

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 33 points 4 days ago (1 children)

What I find quite ironic is that dessalines started Lemmy to get away from the perceived over-moderation of Reddit... only to do the exact same thing.

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 28 points 4 days ago

*Overmoderation as perceived by a tankie.

[–] ShellMonkey@piefed.socdojo.com 31 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Multi comms is likely an instance ban, which they hand out freely on the .ml instance for anyone not in line with their ideology.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] drkt@scribe.disroot.org 29 points 4 days ago

ml users are just like that

these being deliberate would be less surprising than the account being compromised.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 22 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Ahahaha.

This would be deliberate. You'll want to post this on !yepowertrippinbastards@lemmy.dbzer0.com

[–] autonomoususer@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

Done, thanks!

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 18 points 4 days ago

That user had his brain compromised years ago.

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

I think that is just how it is over there.

load more comments
view more: next ›