this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2026
327 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

42240 readers
58 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 97 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hilarious that this company is now named after a failed product. It would be like if Ford changed it's name to Pinto.

[–] matengor@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 week ago

Haha. I will remember that.

[–] NewOldGuard@lemmy.ml 91 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Can’t believe they really rebranded around this shit when we all knew it was a nonsense non-concept five years ago, lmao

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 45 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This should be taught in MBA and finance classes for how Bros get caught up in a hype cycle and how it's all bullshit

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 32 points 1 week ago

they don't learn either cause they dove head first into AI right after.

[–] sakuraba@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago

well we need to remember they changed their name to meta after zucc went to the senate due to the Cambridge Analytica scandal

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 80 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

motherfuckers could probably have ended hunger in their country for that kind of money.

that's how much of a piece of shit this pedophile nazi is.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 10 points 1 week ago

I think that would end all poverty in the entire world

[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 66 points 1 week ago (5 children)

They lose $80B and are still in business? That’s insane.

[–] Botzo@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago

Gotta pad that balance sheet with losses. Can't be paying taxes if you can write off speculative ventures that just might ~~pay off~~ fund other misadventures.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works 38 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They could have cured homelessness 4x over. But instead we got crappy little Zuck-like avatars and an ecosystem nobody ever asked for or wanted.

Fuck this world man.

The world is okay, it's billionaires and stupidity that's the problem

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

Yes, but have you considered that you can simply buy a house on the Metaverse?

[–] ch00f@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago

For everyone who never tried it, they had honest to god paid employees in Horizon Worlds to help players get oriented. I cannot imagine a worse job.

The one I ran into was standing in front of some “game” experience that was like…jumping on tiles or some shit.

Wankers. Shut the whole company down

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago

Buying real estate in the Metaverse used to be compared to buying land on the moon. But Zuck can't turn off the moon, so it's arguably a better investment.

[–] astraeus@lemmy.ml 30 points 1 week ago

Not only was the entire project thing a completely repulsive, uncanny mess, but also they could’ve just bought roblox for half that amount which is effectively the closest thing to a “metaverse” but ig zuck ego wouldn’t allow that

[–] wesker 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 8 points 1 week ago

He could have paid you $40B for that advice and still be better off.

[–] ch00f@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But I thought the whole line was “hOrIzOn WoRlDs iSnt the MeTaVeRsE.”

Followed by no explanation of what the metaverse is.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Finally it can be explained: 1) Dig a ditch, 2) Dump in $80B, 3) Light it on fire.

[–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You didn't slap the acronym AI anywhere on that, you'd only be able to burn 10B through your method.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

1a) Buy $80B in crypto.
1b) Sell the crypto for $50B.

[–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wait. But how will we starve the browns?

[–] Unpigged@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago

Of course by jacking up the energy and water prices, Watson!

[–] sakuraba@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

remember 6 years ago when everyone was saying 'learn to code'?

now what?

[–] titanicx@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Back to physical hardware, installation, troubleshooting. Been doing that as my focus for years. I'm so busy I turn down work.

[–] sakuraba@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

yeah looks like this is the way now, people are not buying new hardware

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] iamericandre@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Go to a trade school

[–] desmosthenes@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] drmoodmood@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] kazerniel@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

ahh the schadenfreude... 😈

[–] TwilitSky@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Remember when everyone made fun of Second Life? Now the people who made it don't need to feel embarrassed anymore because at least they weren't involved in Metaverse. If you were involved with both, there's no salvation left.

[–] crazycraw@crazypeople.online 9 points 1 week ago

ohh bless their hearts.

i love this for them.

[–] RedGreenBlue@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Where did the money go? Programmer salaries?

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 16 points 1 week ago (3 children)

That's a very good question. How do you spend $80billion?

Zuckerberg makes Brewster look like an amateur.

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Tax write offs. There's no way they spent 80 billion, but they'll claim 80 billion in tax deductions for the "loss"

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 3 points 1 week ago

Yes. And lawyers. And hardware manufacturing. And energy to run servers.

[–] SavageCoconut@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

It doesn't matter now. All those idiots who wrote books about how good the mataverse was, how it was going to change our lives, how we will be able to talk to costumer support in a virtual office from our house… all those people who wrote about it did the leap to talk about AI and now are writing about how good AI is… goshhhh

[–] Patrikvo@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago

The Metaverse cycle:

10 Some article remind me it exist;

20 I shrug and continue not to care about the Metaverse;

30 I forget about the existance of the Metaverse;

40 Some amount of time passes;

50 GOTO 10.

[–] Laax@piefed.ca 5 points 1 week ago

Darn shame, poor Zuck

[–] eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think it's hilarious that the entire press and Meta are both like "ope, people don't want to hang out in VR".

furries continue to hang out in VR chat

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sunforged@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago

One more reason for centralized planning.

[–] belated_frog_pants@beehaw.org 4 points 1 week ago

Slop ai header image to talk about the slop company. Ai use is so embarrassing

[–] merdaverse@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago

Are they going to rebrand to Slop now to follow the latest trend?

We have had Meta headsets for a couple years. Still don’t know what the “metaverse” is. The headsets are fun, though.

[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Those lobsters should have top hats and monocles.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›