this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2026
184 points (99.5% liked)

News

36853 readers
2507 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Defense Department is trying to quickly find vendors who are able to ship pre-made shelters to protect troops in the Middle East as the United States’ war with Iran continues.

The department is looking for information from private contractors who can provide “prefabricated, transportable, hardened shelter systems designed to protect personnel from blast and fragmentation threats,” according to a new federal contract notice posted Monday.

all 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 144 points 1 day ago (3 children)

So we can have blast hardened shelters shipped halfway around the world in 30 days but homelessness is unsolvable.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 70 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Who said homelessness is unsolvable? We don't want to solve homelessness because poverty is the lynchpin for capitalism.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 5 points 1 day ago

its also useful culture war tool, someone else to look down upon.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 0 points 1 day ago (4 children)

People with no money can’t participate in capitalism though so it’s every company’s motive to ensure their workers can afford to buy things and keep the economy going.

[–] gibmiser@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Better to err on the side of people dying in the streets than to accidentally let too many workers be able to have enough free time to think about improving society and organizing or protesting.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world -4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If you give them more free tine they’ll spend more money.

This is America people don’t protest, organize or improve society they think that’s other people’s jobs.

[–] teslekova@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

Under capitalism, you need a suffering underclass to keep the working class scared enough to accept their bad conditions and low wages. Generally about 2-3% of the population is sufficient.

[–] EffortlessGrace@piefed.social 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Americans have had a long tradition of organizing and resisting. The 40-hour workweek was bought with worker's blood. The apathy of the American body politic is a relatively new attribute, historically. My opinion is that it metastasized in 1971.

~I was taught all of this in American public high school and public university. Howard Zinn was required reading.~

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Think bigger picture. If you don't have the threat of poverty, you can't convince workers to sell their time for less than it's worth. That's the entire basis for an investment economy. I pay you and sell your work product for more than I paid you, and you can't say no because you'll die ina gutter without my investment capital.

The thing you said is how they keep the masses working, by convincing them that 1) they need to buy stuff, and 2) they will deserve it if they work hard enough.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

The top tenth of earners account for 50% of consumer spending. They don’t care if the poors have money.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If your customer base shrinks but your prices go up you break even or better because it's cheaper to make fewer items.

Economies of scale says it’s cheaper to make lots of things.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago

... We actually can't.

They're not gonna find people that actually do this, this is not a thing that exists.

This is ... what something like an engineering battalion is meant to be able to do.

But we have hollowed out the military itself, as we have hollowed out the entire rest of the country.

Terminal subcontractor brainrot.

[–] BigBrownBeaver@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, let's send the homeless together with bunkers. Two problems solved.

/S

[–] SailorFuzz@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

Don't give Gavin Newsome any ideas.

[–] Fit_Series_573@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Protection for the troops a month after starting the war and 13 of the nearby bases destroyed.... there doesn't even seem to be a plan on where to place these additional 50,000 troops arriving within the next 2 weeks other than leaving them as sitting ducks in ships. There was never a plan ... they are winging it I really hope everyone is realizing this. If it wasn't for some of the naval commanders already saying no to the madmen on bringing our ships closer to shore for an invasion so far, the number of casualties would be alot higher on both sides.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago

It is completely insane to me that basically no one in major media is discussing this:

Ok, so say we somehow get the Tripoli and Boxer up close enough to Kharg or anywhere else such that they can actually deploy LCACs and LAVs and ACVs in an amphib assault.

... Awesome, there are now 500 to 5000 Shahed drones en route to blow them all up while they are motoring to the LZ.

.... what is the fucking counter to this?

Literally none of those things have anti-drone capabilities.

What, are we going to screen an amphib assault with... AH 1Zs and F18s and F35s... shooting down all the drones?

Cool, then a significant proportion of those get shot down too.

Our doctrine is so based on the concept of aerial supremacy that we seem to have just forgotten how to conceptualize not having it.

You do not have aerial supremacy if the enemy can launch aircraft/drones and missiles against your assets.

Its a similar problem with an aerial / air cav style assault... Ospreys or other choppers doing advance insertions, or the 82nd jumping out of C130s...

... They'd all be a shooting gallery for the shorter range drones and missiles that Iran has tons of, that we are not able to premptively destroy.

And if anything manages to land or come ashore... the same problem remains.

Even NeoCon think tanks that have been pushing for the US to fuck up Iran for 20+ years are frantically writing reports trying to explain how stupid the current apparent 'strategy' is.

Its like we are trying to fuck up harder than Gallipoli.

[–] hissingmeerkat@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

50,000?!

I only saw news about the Tripoli and Boxer which combined carry about 5,000 marines.

[–] Fit_Series_573@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

It goes up by the day and there were already naval ships enroute before Tripoli and Boxer were called. This was just on Friday them preparing another 10,000 troops making it close to the 50,000 part of "Operation Epic Fury "

https://www.stripes.com/theaters/middle_east/2026-03-27/82nd-airborne-10000-troops-iran-21196096.html

[–] Xatolos@reddthat.com 14 points 1 day ago
[–] yesman@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This couldn't be more American if the trenches included a fast food restaurant.

Any other country would've issued spades.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago

https://www.csmonitor.com/World/2010/0407/No-more-Burger-King-on-Afghanistan-base-Soldiers-grumble.

See that Burger King? That's a standard shipping container. You can fit that in a C-130 and have it anywhere in the world in 24 hours.

[–] drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

With how electrics play into modern warfare and even more so now I think having a means to set up a base or whatever even faster is going to be a major aspect to this.

[–] SwifferWetjet@thelemmy.club 0 points 1 day ago

Dude great game RIP ghost

[–] runsmooth@kopitalk.net 13 points 1 day ago

Surely another sign that the US has everything under control and knows what they're doing in Iran. /s

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago

And here I was trying to find a use for all those cardboard boxes.

Work is proceeding in secret at the back of Mt Rushmore.

I think they're doing this in the wrong order... you order shelters first then attack, not the other way around.

[–] lemmyng@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

But please, oh great and wise gubbernment, tell us more about how healthcare is unaffordable, grocery prices can't get cheaper, and gas prices need to increase to win duh wahr!

[–] GuyFawkesV@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

I was unaware they could store planes in bunkers. You know, since there will be no boots on the ground, right?

[–] skhayfa@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

So much for preparedness. Feel bad for the soldiers who will be launched into this.

[–] normalentrance@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

Turns out Trump has a shelter guy.

[–] fierysparrow89@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

With a complimentary pony or unicorn, I imagine

[–] Tronn4@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Steve@startrek.website 5 points 1 day ago

Its the department of testosterone injections