this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2026
79 points (98.8% liked)

Science

15871 readers
24 users here now

Studies, research findings, and interesting tidbits from the ever-expanding scientific world.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MerryJaneDoe@beehaw.org 3 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

The actual 3D model is not shown in the above article.

It can be found here: https://www.theguardian.com/society/2026/mar/29/full-network-clitoral-nerves-mapped-out-first-time-women-pelvic-surgery

Be prepared to be unimpressed, lol. I was hoping to unlock secret mysteries of the likes not seen since Kama Sutra was published.

I was not prepared to see an upside-down stoner ashtray.

[–] obbeel@lemmy.eco.br 3 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

I hate that "no health benefits" is added just to compare with the supposed "health benefits" of circumcision, even though I would never like to get rid of my foreskin.

Edit: I'm moderately sure a guy with no foreskin has less pleasure when masturbating than me.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 2 points 23 hours ago

Do we know where it is now, right?

[–] Jake_Farm@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 day ago

Those ovaries are not in the anatomical correct place.

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 46 points 2 days ago
[–] The_Che_Banana@beehaw.org 23 points 2 days ago (2 children)

X-rays were discovered in 1895, it's taken them this long to find it...

[–] CanadaPlus 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

This was a CT scan, or even a specialised kind of CT scan. X-rays are involved, but an emulsion plate in 1905 isn't going to get you a "3D mapping".

Although, yes, it's a neglected area of the body in medicine.

[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 29 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It's cause the clitoris isn't attached to a man.

[–] Firebirdie713@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

A lot of the recent data about the nerves of the clitoris are from donated tissue from trans men who got theirs removed during bottom surgery, so your statement here isn't exactly true. A lot of the issue is the sheer density of nerves in a very small area that makes it hard to study from cadavers, and there aren't large numbers of people getting them removed to study them that way either.

[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What's true is that women's health and anatomy takes a back seat to how to keep men's dicks hard. I say this as a cis het man. It's shameful.

A lot of the recent data about the nerves of the clitoris are from donated tissue from trans men who got theirs removed during bottom surgery

So a lot of the data is from clits that were removed from men? I jest. That's actually pretty interesting, and while I take your point about nerve density and complexity, my point at the top stands.

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So a lot of the data is from clits that were removed from men? I jest.

Why do you jest? This is just a factual statement

[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago

🤔.....fuck me.... you're right! Been a long day.

[–] The_Che_Banana@beehaw.org 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

you joke but:

https://www.bmj.com/content/382/bmj.p2091

women are very underrepresented in medical research

[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 days ago

Yeah....I wasn't joking.

[–] realitista@lemmus.org 19 points 2 days ago

Hold on baby, I need to get out my map.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 4 points 2 days ago

"Scientists finally confirm location of clitoris!"

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 days ago

X-rays?! I use my radiation-free tongue 'n' fingers.