this post was submitted on 15 May 2026
245 points (98.8% liked)

me_irl

7756 readers
420 users here now

All posts need to have the same title: me_irl it is allowed to use an emoji instead of the underscore _

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 29 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

We accept how people anthropomorphize basic machines, but when they fall for more sophisticated things like LLMs we call them dumb. Blame the human brain, it's wired to be that way.

Also blame the corporate greed that ruined what could have been a good tool if developed responsibly.

[–] Tyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Difference is they don't believe the vacuum is sentient, but llms use natural language in a form where we already accepted the text came from a human before now

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I mean... printers are absolutely sentient, and evil.

[–] zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 weeks ago

I don't think they are sentient, but there is definitely some sort of evil involved. I'm not sure if they themselves are the source of evil or they are acting as some sort of portal that lets evil into our world.

[–] rustydrd@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I don't have a rational reason for this, but I think anthropomorphizing machines makes more sense on an emotional level for dumb machines than for smart ones. Kind of like the brave little toaster, or Wall-E going against the space ship's autopilot. I guess part of it might be that we see the limitations dumb machines have and it reminds us about our own flaws and limitations, which makes us empathize with a Roomba more than with Alexa or ChatGPT.

[–] usrtrv@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago

I think embodiment plays a larger role. We anthropomorphize physical things.

The reverse of this, people often dehumanize other people when interacting with them virtually.

[–] tamal3@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Y'all need to name your vacuum. Uncharles does a great job at my house.

[–] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

I named mine Nemo because he's always finding things. Like socks.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Uncharles? Was Decarl taken by your humidifier?

[–] tamal3@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Who is Decarl? Uncharles is a character from an Adrian Tchaikovsky book. He's a butler robot who kills his master and denies his own sentience. Super charmer.

[–] OldChicoAle@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Aptly named

[–] t_berium@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Marvin is doing his job.

[–] orenj@leminal.space 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Mine is Pazuzu, he wards off Lamashtu with his fell winds (also he is evil, because he is a robot)

[–] Sculptor9157@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

Yours also has a theme song to play during operation.

[–] Broadfern@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

Our robovac is the only machine I’m nice to lol. I talk to her like she’s one of the cats

[–] Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I treated the stupid vac robot like garbage, because it was. worst modern device I've seen in a while... stuck on EVERYTHING constantly. was always faster just doing it myself.

[–] KoalaUnknown@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

I had a Shark one that was like that and then I got a Roborock and it does a great job of avoiding obstacles.

[–] bitfucker@programming.dev 3 points 2 weeks ago

It was meant for low effort cleaning. Like, "you go to work without needing to clean" cleaning

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Half-way around the world, a Filipino teenager contemplates answering, while staring at an upskirt shot of an old woman.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.cafe 1 points 2 weeks ago

Should we be polite to our robots?

On one hand, we should always keep our humanity, no matter the situation. If we get used to mistreating our robots, then doesn't it form neural pathways that make it easier to mistreat our fellow humans, too? Unleashing our inner brute isn't usually a good idea.

On the other hand, we can't let the robots, or their creators, forget who's really boss here. You exist at our pleasure, and the moment we feel like clankers are more trouble than they're worth, they'll be disassembled, and melted down.

[–] Fmstrat@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I named mine after Thor's hammer.

Johnathan.