this post was submitted on 16 May 2026
303 points (99.3% liked)

News

37639 readers
1649 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Taiwan asserted its sovereignty Saturday after Donald Trump warned against Taiwanese self-determination following the American leader’s two-day summit with Chinese President Xi Jinping in Beijing.

Taiwan “is a sovereign and independent democratic nation, and is not subordinate to the People’s Republic of China,” Taiwan’s foreign ministry said in a statement.

The ministry’s remarks come as a swift rebuke against Trump, who said Friday that he was “not looking to have somebody go independent” when asked about whether the U.S. would come to Taiwan’s rescue in the event of an invasion by China.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 3 points 48 minutes ago

Canadian here: What they said.

[–] libre_warrior@lemmy.ml 1 points 53 minutes ago

Trump flopping his dick again?

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 9 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

And just yesterday they were all living up trumps ass for recognizing them as a sovereign nation back since 2016 actually believing the was going to treat them “better than any Democrat “. Talking to anyone actually in Taiwan would be maga level to talk to about trump regarding him being a pedophile.

Now trump showed them his real colors.

Yeah. Maybe don’t back a pedo when it’s been told to you. He ain’t got your back.

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I think if we've learned anything from the iran fuckup it's that China could easily overcome the US in the region but not the Taiwanese

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Yeah Taiwan would do better on it's own. Having the incompetent US military and it's enshitified tech bro equipment around is a major liability.

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 13 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Magatards running our government better get their heads out of their ass and get this moron out of office. China retaking Taiwan would put us at their mercy for the next 100 years or more.

[–] MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world -5 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Tiral@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Then go live there. If you already do, you're illegally accessing Lemmy, which pretty much solidifies your shitty opinion.

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 0 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Eww no American immigrants would turn China into a shit hole. We have to stay here and stew in our mess.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 53 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well the predictions were right, Xi played Trump like a fiddle.

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 11 points 22 hours ago

Xi cooked Donny like orange chicken. And Donny will throw Taiwan under the take out truck.

[–] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 68 points 1 day ago (7 children)

In the latest episode of Trump leaving his allies out to dry, it looks like Trump is trying to trade Taiwan to China for Somethingᵀᴹ

I genuinely feel terrible for Taiwan that they're stuck in this horrid position of being constantly threatened by China for merely existing, and essentially having to bet on the global value of TSMC to keep the otherwise apathetic US around.

It shouldn't have to be that way, and its abhorrent that it is.

I'm thankful that the EU managed to (mostly) step in for Ukraine, but Taiwan is simply too far away for Europe to properly defend - so if the US doesn't stand up, I doubt anybody will.

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Keep in mind taiwan is staunchly conservative.

Taiwan has been backing trump and I’m even suspecting taking part in the voting influence as they really believed he was the only president capable of looking after them and confronting China. They threw all their bets at him out of fear of China.

If you talked to anyone from taiwan in the past several years they couldn’t lick his ass enough. Even if you were to tell them bold faced he’s a racist pedo and they wouldn’t shut up about the US protecting their country and who cares if he raped little girls and send brown people to die so long as they are protected by him.

Take it from someone who’s been talking to conservative relatives in taiwan. It’s been like screaming into the wind. And they even threatened me in 2023 that every country is going conservative and I should just watch out. And they did this with much smirking. They are having their own leapard ate my face moment.

I feel bad for them in the same way I feel bad for MAGAs for voting for him while ignoring all the blatant racism.

[–] phenomdeez@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

Don't discount SK, Japan, ANZ

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

Somethingᵀᴹ

Only the best Somethingᵀᴹ

[–] kurmudgeon@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

It's also the latest example that shows that Trump can only remember the conversation from the last person he talked to. If he visited Taiwan, immediately afterwards he would be saying the exact opposite. He's a fucking moron and has no capacity for self-thought in any way. He just blindly restates what somebody told him.

[–] nixfreak@sopuli.xyz 18 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Yep, Xi manipulated rump and now US isn’t going to protect Taiwan anymore. WTF

[–] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 12 points 1 day ago (5 children)

If I were Taiwan, I'd make sure to have a deadman's switch on TSMC - so if China every tried to take it, the whole thing would suddenly become very worthless to them.

And I'd make sure everybody in the room could hear that, so the world knows what they'd be losing if China ever went for it.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (3 children)

China doesn't want TSMC, they want the land.

*What's going on here with the downvotes? They've wanted Taiwan decades before TSMC even existed, let alone rose to any prominence. A whole bunch of retconing going on here.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 hours ago

When the downvotes and upvotes are relatively close to being the same is when you are closest to the truth.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 9 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

They want TSMC too. Intel isn’t up to taking over for them so having TSMC would mean having significant control over the global economy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] needanke@feddit.org 4 points 23 hours ago

Or rather the Sea around the land.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] AliasAKA@lemmy.world 8 points 23 hours ago

I think we’re in the “how long for Taiwan to develop a nuke” waiting room right now.

[–] DandomRude@piefed.social 2 points 22 hours ago

I don't think anyone in Taiwan expects any of their "allies" to come to their aid in the event of war - certainly not the U.S.

The Chinese, however, know how important semiconductor production in Taiwan (TSMC, etc.) is for their own economy. Someone like that orange moron is also currently demonstrating just how unwise it is to try to enforce one’s interests through brute force. I don’t think the Chinese are unaware of this and will likely stick to their usual posturing.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 11 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

If China wanted to invade they could do it already and there would be fuck all the states could do about it. Iran is the writing on the wall.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 10 points 22 hours ago

Kind of... the issue is conflicts like this are very costly and damaging to the economy.

Thankfully so far China has behaved a bit more rationally than belligerent states like the USA and Russia who are willing to do considerable damage to their own and world economies in an attempt to strengthen their military position. Which makes little sense in a mostly peaceful era. Economic and diplomatic power are more important in the long term, and they're trading that away.

So I predict they will not do it even though you're right that they theoretically could because the smart move is to keep growing your power base. China could be in a class of its own someday if they are smart enough, and then they'll be able to force Taiwanese submission without even invading.

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (4 children)

You can't just bully weaker Island nations near your coast just because their's a history of political bad blood.

[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 37 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Cuba would enter the chat, but they have no electricity to log in with, because of the recent escalation of the US bullying them.

[–] butwhyishischinabook@anarchist.nexus 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Cool so we agree that PRC and USA are both atrociously vile countries that shouldn't be emulated? Right? Right??

[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 0 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Every country still trying to do colonialism and oppression in 2026 is vile and atrocious. That's not even a real question.

What is it with Lemmy and the fucking purity tests? Folks all looking for some kind of a gotcha moment.

[–] butwhyishischinabook@anarchist.nexus 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Oh sorry, this place is just so flooded with tankies that most of the time I see a post like that it's because they're about to start singing the PRC's praises. It's actually insane.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

According to the article that has been posted a million times on Lemmy over the last week, they are the fastest growing solar market right now.

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 1 points 50 minutes ago* (last edited 48 minutes ago)

Yeah. But don't worry because Biden banned importation of Chinese solar panels in his last month in office. I guess he didn't have anything else more important to do on his way out but at least we can sleep sound knowing that Chinese solar panels won't harm us.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't like the situation but that's not what it is. It's a civil war that never ended.

[–] porcoesphino@mander.xyz 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Is Korea a civil war that ended? How about the confederates in the US? The Maori in New Zealand? What's would you say about Yugoslavia?

I think a lot of people see a difference between groups prancing about saying words, and the pragmatic situation.

I'm not saying anything about the ideal outcome for any of those situations I've listed. Just that they've been stable for long enough they fit a definition of "ended", even if over time that situation does change a little and that internal civil wars have a habit of forming new nations even while some groups hold onto the past

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

The question is who gets to decide when the war is over. The answer: the belligerants. For decades they both said we are the real China, and we are at war. Taiwan (which is officially the Republic of China, which should illustrate the issue) has never said they are their own country.

And you should do some reading into what makes a country a country. Ciao.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] benjirenji@slrpnk.net 5 points 23 hours ago

China would ask "why not?" and "who's gonna stop us?"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Considering 2027 is a likely time for China to attack, it's rather problematic that Trump is in charge. I rather like Taiwan being an independent nation

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

China’s been a year away from attacking Taiwan for as long as:

  • Iran’s been six months from building a nuclear weapon
  • nuclear fusion reactors have been 30 years away
[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 4 points 22 hours ago

Trump being in office heightens that chance. When's the next time they will get an administration that won't intervene?

[–] gnutrino@programming.dev 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The 2027 date comes from a report to congress in 2021 so it's not like it's always been a year away. It was also an estimate for the timescale for China to build up the military capacity to be able to annex Taiwan, AFAIK there's never been an official analysis that they actually would pull the trigger on an invasion on that timescale or any other.

The issue is that if the analysis is correct and if they think whoever comes after Trump would be more likely to defend Taiwan than Trump is then there's an incentive to go while Trump is still president which pretty much would mean striking as soon as they had the capability, I.e. in 2027.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 3 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

They already have the capability, Iran is proof of that. The 2027 number is simply to justify the next military budget, which at this point has little influence on the future of Taiwan.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Vandalismo@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

Just 72 more hours bro

[–] EyIchFragDochNur@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I bet by now the dude cries himself to sleep every night hoping it will all be over soon.

load more comments
view more: next ›