this post was submitted on 19 May 2026
144 points (96.2% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14366 readers
650 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Weedian@hexbear.net 63 points 3 days ago (7 children)

just because people may have "changed" doesn't mean they should be anywhere near a leadership position. I don't believe he has changed one bit but if he has why is he instantly running for senate and not volunteering at a soup kitchen or something like that

[–] Hexamerous@hexbear.net 38 points 3 days ago

Really takes white guy confidence and entitlement to think he should be running anything after that. It also takes a settler mindset to "see past" all that and voting for this guy.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] shath@hexbear.net 45 points 3 days ago (2 children)

fucking abu ghraib are you fucking kidding me?

[–] Lussy@hexbear.net 36 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Gtfo this guy was stationed at abu ghraib?

Dude what, everyone looks like a bigger and bigger clown for whitewashing him with esch passing day. What’s next with this guy?

[–] RedWizard@hexbear.net 15 points 2 days ago

Progressives will tell you that he "was just a guard". Where have I heard that before?

[–] kleeon@hexbear.net 22 points 2 days ago

Ikr? This guy has to be a psyop

[–] la_tasalana_intissari_mata@hexbear.net 56 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

"but revolutions need veterans t-" I would put this person on the front lines to die and rot, not as a misleader you vote for in the most evil capitalist state in the world.

[–] Lussy@hexbear.net 36 points 3 days ago

The revolution needs militants, militancy, people with military experience, yes, nobody said ‘ a warcrime enjoyer with a nazi tattoo’. I didn’t ask for this, nobody asked for this

[–] Dimmer06@hexbear.net 38 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Nah he belongs in a prison for war criminals. A bloodthirsty guy like him is exactly who a revolutionary army does not want on the front lines because they're going to hurt working people who's support we need. Also his only experience in war is against poorly armed militias he could call airstrikes onto so I doubt he's really all that talented of a military man.

[–] Kefla@hexbear.net 21 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Exactly. I mean of course if you're going to war, having people with war experience help you through common pitfalls is a benefit. I'd absolutely listen to Graham Platner's advice/leadership if I had a gun in my hand and a gang of fash mercenaries on the horizon. But in any other context he should shut the fuck up and/or die.

[–] la_tasalana_intissari_mata@hexbear.net 40 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'd absolutely listen to Graham Platner's advice/leadership if I had a gun in

Platner: okay so back in my days of combat in situation we would've called an airstrike on an orphanage near by

[–] goferking0 6 points 2 days ago

or used grenade launchers instead of the mortars we were forced to stop using out of civilian casualties concerns

[–] QinShiHuangsShlong@lemmy.ml 39 points 3 days ago

gang of fash mercenaries on the horizon.

I don't know if I'd be trusting the nazi tattoo guy in that specific instance. Maybe if it was a group of unarmed Muslim families it might be more in his area of expertise.

[–] OhioComrade@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago

Real veteran revolutionary is Greg Levy running for Ohio Senate.

[–] ConcreteHalloween@hexbear.net 19 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I'm frankly a bit confused about what this guy's deal is.

Like is he trying to do Nazi entryism into left? If he is you'd think he'd do a better job covering up all the Nazi shit he did. Is he a CIA plant? Same issue as the last one, you'd think they'd pick a dude with a cleaner resume. Is his current stated progressive views genuine and he just had some kind of epiphany? If that's his story you'd think he'd run on that, "I used to be a violent CHUD but now I've seen the light!" but nah he downplays it. Does he not see any contradiction between his past actions and his current politics?

[–] bobs_guns@lemmygrad.ml 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Maybe he's just a typical liberal opportunist who is a little more honest about his fascism than most.

[–] comrade_pibb@hexbear.net 16 points 2 days ago

This is my read. He's just a dumbass

[–] thelastaxolotl@hexbear.net 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

My theory is that he used to be an actual nazi, but then turned into a lib but he was ashamed of his nazi past so instead of owning up to it, he keep making up lies like he was edgy or he didnt know he got a nazi tatoo in order to save face

[–] john_brown@hexbear.net 15 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I don't think he's ashamed of it because he would have gotten that death's head removed or covered long ago if he had even the slightest shame. He's genuinely the perfect DNC candidate, he's a liberal who is comfortable slipping into the fascist defense of capitalism when it suits him without any ideological change or shift needed.

[–] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net 6 points 2 days ago (5 children)

He's genuinely the perfect DNC candidate

This really doesn't make sense when you account for his anti-Zionist rhetoric. Why would the DNC normalize a candidate who just yesterday during a NYT interview said AIPAC money is disqualifying and US aid to Israel should be cut off completely?

The DNC would not do that

[–] Juice@midwest.social 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Its just politics.

Susan Collins is a literal dragon, Platner has the best run on her. Keep in mind, the DNC varies in strength and organization. I think it shows Platner's campaign is willing to "play ball" in order to, however unlikely, make a good run at that senate seat. I'd say its more likely the DC consultant class that defines the national org (a class that is objectively on the back-foot, as the left is gaining nationally, albeit with mixed outcomes) thinks Platner is their best bet at an already extremely unlikely upset.

I think they have a read on him that would put him closer to Fetterman in the Senate. I think Platner is kind of dumb but upsetting Collins would be hilarious. And Platner has managed to get national attention, even pretty early on. I think he's just objectively the best odds in this race.

But I'm not to the point of even critically supporting him. I don't think he's earned a goddamn thing, being a highly problematic ex military pseudo anarchist or whatever doesnt make him qualified to lead our movements. But I think part of Platner's viability is because of a very weak bench in this race. Maine DNC clearly isn't creating or recruiting good leadership, which is a persistant problem in many political orgs.

[–] john_brown@hexbear.net 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Because he will never follow through, he's an experiment in the new move of distancing from AIPAC while normalizing and taking funds from other Zionist orgs that are less notorious

[–] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It doesn't matter if he doesn't follow through; they would still be normalizing anti-Zionist politics and proving it's a winning campaign strategy. The DNC and its Israeli allies would never in a million years sign off on that, they don't want anti-Zionism to be normalized under any circumstance, let alone under the context of a Senate race

taking funds from other Zionist orgs that are less notorious

What are these orgs?

[–] john_brown@hexbear.net 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Then why are they backing him? Schumer endorsed. Regarding the Zionist PACs that operate as low key alternatives to AIPAC, I don't have a list on me but I can pull up some references when I'm back at my desk later.

[–] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Then why are they backing him?

They're not backing him, he's winning by unprecedented margins, and their zionist pet Janat Mills ate shit and dropped out, so it's a mixture of damage control and not giving up the kayfabe and endorsing the Republican candidate. Remember, this is Maine; Schumer can't hide there behind media noise or silence like he can in other states; it's too small and white, the Democratic party in that state would implode. So he gave Platner a mealy-mouthed endorsement

Also as an irrelevant aside, Platner somehow did the impossible and transformed the r/Maine sub into an anti-Zionist hub, a US STATE SUBREDDIT, I literally said out loud, WTF? I mean if this is the DNC's plan, I say don't interrupt the enemy

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What if he wants healthcare and whatnot for himself and others but he just uh he just really likes killing people

[–] goferking0 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

He even wants to help others kill with the desire to increase navy ship building

[–] ConcreteHalloween@hexbear.net 7 points 2 days ago

Oh is that something he's running on?

Shit that would actually explain a lot.

[–] Lussy@hexbear.net 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

He is a CIA plant doing nazi entryism into the left

[–] ConcreteHalloween@hexbear.net 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

To what end though? Like is there a particularly vibrant leftist movement in Maine nobody told me about?

Also seems like there'd be better candidates to do this than the guy with a straight up Nazi tattoo on his chest.

[–] Lussy@hexbear.net 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don’t , a blood thirsty ex-imperial with a nazi tattoo is kind of what they’d want to discredit the anti-Israel anti-war left..

[–] ConcreteHalloween@hexbear.net 1 points 2 days ago

If that's the case you'd think there's be a lot more pro-Israel outlets and figures harping on this guy's big ass Nazi tattoo.

Yet I only ever see this guy get talked about in leftist spaces, the right doesn't even seem to notice him. Are they waiting till if/when he's elected to go on the attack about it?

[–] Dort_Owl@hexbear.net 31 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Annnnd he's seeing someone about his bloodlust towards innocents, right?

Right?!

[–] john_brown@hexbear.net 8 points 2 days ago

The someones he's seeing about it: His DNC staffers

[–] muad_dibber@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 2 days ago

We need to start calling them the Abu Ghraib torture camp left.

[–] goferking0 8 points 3 days ago

Again is this a critic of Maine if this is the best they can do to be a progressive or just the only one who said yes to running when asked.

load more comments
view more: next ›