Step away from the CAD workstation, Elon.
this post was submitted on 28 May 2026
8 points (68.2% liked)
News
37815 readers
1471 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
I don't think that man has used a CAD program in his life
He has money to hire masters at CAD, then to brag he did it all himself.
Welll I for one am proud of us having access to military grade dumpsters!
I hope for you it's better quality than the cybertruck
This is from General Dynamics and Rheinmetall. What's the association with Musk?
It's a joke. The thing looks like a Cybertruck, so the idea is that Musk is to blame.
The design is reminiscent of the Cybertruck
Seems weird to have flat armor paneling. Wouldn't you want to try to deflect shots?
The design is reminiscent of the Cybertruck
Ah, thanks.
$500 drones will pawn 100% of these overpriced cyber trucks. Literally a waste of taxpayers money.
edit: better article
They're "expected to include active defense against drones", but the renders are just a tank with sharper edges. Seems like what's needed is more some sort of land destroyer that can shoot down drones and shield nearby forces rather than making new land battleships with big guns and thick armor.
There are two nations who have tanks currently fighting a land war and no one's talking about who has the tank with the bigger gun.
Supposedly tanks are meant to be portable bunkers with a swivel cannon instead of embrasures. However, they cannot move forward and hold ground without air superiority. They need support and a supply line (usually a big, long one) to stay fueled and protected from drones, rockets, etc.
In the Russia/Ukraine war, neither side is able to maintain air superiority which is why a $500 drone can take out a $10 million tank.
I'm sure the military brass in Russia knows that they're using tanks poorly but those above them are idiots that demand specific regions be taken/taken back for political reasons (have to keep the dictator happy and as in the dark as possible!). Hence why we see regular footage of Ukraine troops blowing up lone, unsupported tanks with drones.
That tank shouldn't be all alone like that.
A tank alone is a deathtrap.
It might even be that troops are given orders to move from position A to position B and they think it's safest to take a tank. Since the Russian side is absolutely full of barely-trained, poorly-educated folks who were forcibly drafted out of their incredible corrupt, economic hell hole, lone tanks suffering this kind of defeat makes a lot of sense.
They should've just sucked it up and moved on foot. In fact, I'm surprised that motorbikes aren't everywhere in that war. They can carry troops quickly across the exact type of terrain we see in videos and can be easily modified to work on snow and ice. More powerful versions can even be hooked up to trailers to move equipment across rough terrain.
My only guess as to why they're not being used is that the Russians don't want to be giving Ukraine lots of free motorbikes (because unlike tanks, the bike is usually fine after "a kill")
I don't think you will ever be able to reach a level of air superiority that will prevent drone attacks.
Cybertank? How...nice..
How will they build it, when they are giving away Taiwan to China, the main manufacturer of microchips.
we're gonna build our own fabs. how hard could it be? also its gonna take what, 2 years tops. certainly it won't take decades and cost trillions of dollars to replace Taiwan's capacity with domestic industry. i mean if that were true then our government would be crazy to be so blasé about our commitments to our strategic partners. boy am i glad we don't live in that world!
repurposed cybertruck
Fibreglass panels stuck on Cybertrucks?