this post was submitted on 29 May 2026
124 points (93.7% liked)

politics

29902 readers
2261 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sureshot0@discuss.online 4 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

And yet he hasn't self-murdered, so he's lying. This is not his opinion. I can't imagine why he thinks this will get him money, but who knows, maybe it will.

edit: Maybe he's waiting for an AI good enough to download his brain into.... anybody ever thought of just lying to him?

[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Modern people have no balls, this man should be burned at the stake

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Honestly, if I were on the jury of the murder trial of his killer, and the killer claimed self defense, I would vote not guilty.

Why exactly isn't it self defense to kill someone trying to build a machine to destroy the world?

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

He sexually assaulted his sister too.

Why are such pos allowed to be in charge of anything?

[–] Redditisbollocks@feddit.uk 17 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Does this guy never just shut the fuck up?

Every day I see "Sam Altmann says".

Go and have a steamy sex shower with Elon and just fuck off.

[–] Seldon@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 3 hours ago

"CEO says" journalism. Gives these morons so much attention.

[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 10 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (2 children)

He didn't say that.

This article is based on an essay Altman wrote 9 years ago where he claims that humanity's only hope of survival is to merge with AI and transcend into a new, transhuman species.

Look, I fucking hate Sam Altman. He represents everything that's wrong with the Tech industry, and is also a pretty good example of everything that's wrong with capitalism writ large. Sam sucks. He lies, he cheats, he steals. But lying about Altman does not help the anti-AI cause. It just muddies the message and gives bad actors more shit to stir. And besides... it's not like we have to make shit up about the guy to make him look bad. There's SO much crazy shit he actually did say that you can point to instead.

I'm reporting this postto the mods as misinformation, and I hope others do too. AI sucks. Sam sucks. But we have to tell the truth, or we're no better than they are.

[–] turdburglar@piefed.social 3 points 1 hour ago

do you meant to tell me that real time tech apocalypse dot com isn’t a trusted news source?

[–] sureshot0@discuss.online 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 21 minutes ago)

There was a tech CEO who explicitly said he wanted humanity to die off, I just can't remember who it was

Edit: It was Peter Thiel if I'm not mistaken

[–] trackball_fetish@lemmy.wtf 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)
[–] A404@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 hours ago
[–] Econode@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Ai psychosis. Never get high on your own supply.

[–] Psiczar@aussie.zone 10 points 6 hours ago

No, he’s just a salesman who has something to sell and he is working hard to sell it. “Humanity will die out unless you buy my product!”

He also has competition so he needs to stay relevant, which is why he makes these grand statements that get media attention.

[–] Eldritch@piefed.world 102 points 9 hours ago (2 children)
[–] athatet@lemmy.zip 28 points 8 hours ago (4 children)

Please use one of the countless templates that doesn’t involve a fucking creep.

[–] sureshot0@discuss.online 2 points 1 hour ago

I don't listen to pop music, what did he do?

[–] Eldritch@piefed.world 22 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Absolutely fair call and noted.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Use the one with the sunglasses girl far superior version. Yes I am just saying that cause she's wearing aviators.

[–] Eldritch@piefed.world 1 points 12 minutes ago

Yeah I think I know the one. I honestly don't know anything about Drake really beyond the name. I don't listen to his music etc or have any idea what he may have done. But I know you definitely don't put any sort of celebrity on a pedestal. They're just people after all.

[–] binarytobis@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

Sometimes I’m surprised how many meme templates are based on celebrities I find distasteful.

[–] Insekticus@aussie.zone 1 points 4 hours ago

Bourgeoisie extinction is the best case solution.

It's the dream utopian solution.

To finally exsanguinate the hydra of greed and evil, just before humanity's dying breath, like a true underdog legend;

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 10 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

This is just insane speculative babbling, you could just as well make the exact same argument for genetically designed mutations.
It's just bullshit that we MUST fuse with digital machinery to survive, and in no way is relevant at this point.
Because we simply don't have the technologies to make it an attractive proposal, and we are very far from it.
Arguing we should fuse our minds with strong AI, is essentially arguing that we should allow our minds to be partially controlled and constantly influenced by this fused AI.
That looks like the first step of becoming like Borgs from Star trek, that end up losing their individuality.

IMO Sam Altman can just go fuck himself, he doesn't know shit about what he is talking about. He just has "visions" probably induced by toxic vapors or something with similar effect.

Yeah, let's just kill him instead

[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 60 points 9 hours ago (8 children)

Extinction is the default, you dolt. We were trying to see if we could get a different outcome rather than the default.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 37 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

These people are not clever.

[–] santa@sh.itjust.works 6 points 8 hours ago

They are brilliant morons.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] A404@lemmy.dbzer0.com 44 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

The billionaires are out for blood. Tought you guys should know.

[–] foodandart@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago

Old news. check out this interview with Warren Buffet from 20 years ago, in the New York Times.. https://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/26/business/yourmoney/26every.html

[–] BonsaiBoo@lemmy.world 15 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Always have been. They just want to play god among men a few more times before they run into their bunkers and end times yachts, and their idea of god is the Old Testament one, where it’s disdainful, demands fealty, is cruel, uncaring, vengeful, requires constant sacrifices to the already stripped down servants, and constant adulation in the form of chants, statues, regailings that hail them as superior and well loved.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (4 children)

It's hilariously sad because it all hinges on them somehow keeping complete control over everyone after all the systems that brought them to the level of wealth they have will be broken and gone. They fail to understand that they succeeded in a system where they didn't have to fear someone cutting their head off to take their place as the new leader of the bunker or will just cut off their head and just fucking leave the bunker behind with their corpse left rotting all alone. When all rules and order are out of the window, they are 100% reliant on their precious technology to continue being in control. All it takes is a failure of ONE of those systems for it to all come crashing down and for their head of security to become a new local warlord. They literally are textbook definitions of "hubris."

Only Zuckerberg actually seems to be considering that aspect in terms of his physical training and fighting training. I wouldn't be surprised if he's also had extensive firearms training, honestly. Out of all of them I can see him having the self-discipline to actually learn the skills he would need to survive after retreating to a bunker. He may still come off like a robot, but he's clearly a little bit more put together than the rest of them, who are either roided out freaks like Bezos or idiots like Musk who couldn't even get roided up correctly because he's so fucking lazy.

[–] BonsaiBoo@lemmy.world 8 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

The problem with zuck is you have to have a community to survive any situation where the systems break down, and he’s not likable enough or social enough to stay in or properly form a community. He made his money with an antisocial hot girl rating site that turned into apps that fed off making people insecure and scared constantly so they’d forever doom scroll. He is incapable of defending himself from multiple tribes simultaneously, including his own.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Oh absolutely, but the fact that he can listen to experts means he may just be willing enough to listen to experts and do some socially ingratiating things even if he as a person doesn't actually care about them. Zuck is an evil asshole, but I don't actually think he's stupid.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 14 points 8 hours ago

You go first, bro

[–] AshMan85@lemmy.world 9 points 8 hours ago

We will have a chance of survival after we eat the rich

[–] tanisnikana@lemmy.world 16 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

And here I thought Ted Faro from Horizon Zero Dawn was bad writing.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Wow, and I thought I was the only one who actually thought Aloy was really pretty but also didn't understand the accolades for the writing which seemed very one note and had flat character development.

[–] wuffah@lemmy.world 16 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

“The only way we can save humanity is to buy my product!”

He’s not warning us, he’s threatening us.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 hours ago

Many billionaires want the world to become unstable, to have civilisation collapse while they are chilling in their massive bunker. Then to rebuild the world the way they like after that. It's why they are all building these huge bunker complexes on Hawaii and New Zealand, among other places.

Evangelicals same thing. They believe in a prophecy claiming the end of the world will come after a conflict in the middle east between the Jewish and Islamic groups, causing global nuclear destruction. The apocalypse. When that happens, Jesus will return and they will all go to heaven. So they actively want this to happen, so they can go to heaven. And super influencial people already have been very close to the US nuclear launch key. They collect money for Israel to support their war, even though they don't like jews, but it is an attempt to make their prophecy come true.

These people are complete nut jobs and extremily dangerous. They have people in very high places. Also, how would they go to heaven if they support violence, war crimes and crimes against humanity. Jesus said "do no harm" right? They are so fucking dumb yet a very serious threat to many, if not all.

[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 7 points 8 hours ago

Capitalism is a death cult

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 13 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] A404@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

You are supposed to tie the rag around the neck of the bottle FYI.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] unmagical@lemmy.ml 15 points 10 hours ago

So should we extinct you to spare ourselves?

[–] GirthBrooksPLO@lemmy.world 13 points 9 hours ago

Sounds like he didn't get the message with the first few Molotov cocktails.

[–] BigMacHole@thelemmy.club 14 points 9 hours ago

BUT not HIS Extinction so PLEASE make sure to ONLY use your Pitchforks on Mothers and Children!

-Republicans on Welfare!

load more comments
view more: next ›