this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2026
298 points (99.3% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

46156 readers
405 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that. Please post actually infuriating posts to !actually_infuriating@lemmy.world

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating. If your post better fits !Actually_Infuriating put it there.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, but attribution is not required in any way. No links to Reddit in post body


-If you would like to provide a source link, do so in the comments but not in the post body.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

WASHINGTON — Astronomers are calling on nations to ban advertising in space that can be seen from the ground, calling it the latest threat to the dark and quiet sky.

At a briefing during the 245th Meeting of the American Astronomical Society earlier this month, the organization rolled out a statement calling for bans on “obtrusive space advertising” because of the interference it could cause for groundbased astronomy.

Obtrusive space advertising is defined in U.S. federal law as “advertising in outer space that is capable of being recognized by a human being on the surface of the Earth without the aid of a telescope or other technological device.” Such advertising is banned in federal law through prohibitions on granting launch licenses for missions carrying payloads to carry out space advertising.

top 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 14 points 6 hours ago

It's about time.

Although honestly, with this government, all this might do is give them ideas...

They should add to it though. No construction projects or any commercial activity on the near-side of the moon.

[–] sportsjorts@lemmy.zip 26 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Please God no. This timeline is fucking horrible.

[–] VanRayInd@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Is it time for molotovs yet?

[–] Cypher45@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Oh please, y'all would talk about molotoves and guillotines everyday, yet none of you would do a thing.

[–] VanRayInd@lemmy.world 0 points 3 hours ago
[–] sportsjorts@lemmy.zip 5 points 5 hours ago

I would say it’s long past time. Just waiting until ice kicks down my door and shoots my cats and puts a bag over my head with this post.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

they shouldn't seek a global ban on it?

[–] sportsjorts@lemmy.zip 5 points 6 hours ago

I can see how my statement might have been a little confusing. I would absolutely love to see a global ban of advertising in space coupled with rockets that automatically fire and take out any space billboards that are snuck up there.

[–] Naich@piefed.world 88 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

I will not buy anything from any company that puts advertising in space. I will also make it my life's work to persuade everyone else likewise.

[–] db_null@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

We're 43 people already, the remaining 95% will continue to buy it anyway because...

  1. It just tastes better
  2. It can't be that bad
  3. It's convenient
  4. I've always bought that
  5. I have nothing to hide

Pick as many as you like. More than just dissuading people, I think it's high time to sabotage and destruct.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 5 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

TIL 43 people are 5% of the world population...

Also, how do you plan to sabotage space billboards?

[–] VonReposti@feddit.dk 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Or his dataset consists of 860 people and only 43 said they'd boycott it.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 1 points 8 minutes ago

If so, that context was missing from their comment

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 1 points 7 minutes ago

I'll try spinning, that's a good trick!

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 16 points 10 hours ago
[–] Lazer365@feddit.nl 6 points 6 hours ago

Isn’t it lovely that we live in a world where we need a law to ban such a thing? It honestly already doesn’t matter anymore because when you look up at the sky you almost see more Starlink trash than stars…

[–] brap@lemmy.world 39 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

If I see your shit advertised in space I will never buy your product again.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 9 points 10 hours ago
[–] deacon@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago

BE SURE TO DRINK YOUR OVALTINE

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 27 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

This is exactly like skywriting.

Once it got popular it got really popular for advertising, then people got mad and it was an affront to God and legislators were forced to shut it down.

But also, after the novelty it stopped being effective and it just made people angry.

Now, arguably 2026’s companies care less about making people mad than any time since like the coal wars. But I still think you can’t keep posting people off forever and expect good brand outcomes. And if you can, you don’t need ads do you?

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 12 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

the coal wars

As an aside, it just made me a little happy to know that there's at least one other person out in the world that's read a history book at some point.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 5 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

It doesn’t but I mean in a corporations not feeding any consequence way.

Obviously ads are not like company towns or the coal union suppression.

But I do think corporations were only more hostile to people in that era. And modern companies have zero fear of repercussions, because they face none.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 8 points 10 hours ago

Yeah, well.

Unfortunately it's a deliberately untaught period in our history, so the vast majority of Americans have never heard of it and probably can't conceive of literally going to war against corporations, so it makes me happy whenever I come across someone who's aware of it.

[–] PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@anarchist.nexus 25 points 10 hours ago

Do all other advertising next

[–] Cascio@lemmy.world 9 points 8 hours ago

Excerpt from "Red Dwarf: Infinity Welcomes Careful Drivers": For anyone living on Earth the result would be mindfizzlingly spectacular. One hundred and twenty-eight stars would appear to go supernova simultaneously, burning with such ferocity they would be visible even in daylight.

And the hundred and twenty-eight supernovae would spell out a message.

And this would be the message:

‘COKE ADDS LIFE!’

[–] elvith@feddit.org 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Obtrusive space advertising is defined in U.S. federal law as “advertising in outer space that is capable of being recognized by a human being on the surface of the Earth without the aid of a telescope or other technological device.”

Too bad they have the requirement for a technological device. Else I'd be able to argue that I shouldn't get any ads from satellite TV or when using Starlink or...

[–] MartianSands@sh.itjust.works 5 points 7 hours ago

Pretty sure that would be advertising from space, rather than in space, which would definitely make a difference in this case

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 17 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

An older story, I know, but today was the first I heard of space-based advertising, and it made my blood boil a little.

To be clear, the infuriating part is people trying to put ads in the sky, not the astronomers fighting back, who are in fact awesome.

[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I don't think it goes far enough. Satellites should not be allowed to arrange or emit for any aesthetics reason, advertising or not. They should be required to do everything they can to go unseen.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 0 points 5 hours ago

And the near-side of the moon should be preserved with bans on commercial activity and construction projects.

Or maybe just any that can be seen from earth, even with a telescope. If you can dig a tunnel and build an underground complex without the ports and vents being visible, then I guess that can be allowed. But that should be a negotiating chip, not a part of the first proposal.

[–] Elgenzay@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 hours ago

I think i might kill someone if i see an ad in the night sky

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

If we ban space advertising, then only criminals will be able to advertise in space.

What we need to fight bad advertisers in space is good advertisers in space.

This could be solved if we only allowed astronauts to conceal-carry ad-copy.

(I like to use gun arguments out of context, because it emphasizes how dumb they are.)

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 0 points 5 hours ago

Conservatives watch too many westerns, where the good guy defeats the bad guy in a standoff.

This is completely unrealistic though, because a "bad guy with a gun" would just show up and start shooting before anyone even knows he has a gun. And by the time the good guy gets there, dozens of people would already be dead.

Also "good guy with a gun" reeks of vigilantism and copaganda. "Oh, thank god the sheriff is here to save the day! Oh... oh wait he's just gonna abuse the laborers and move on, without bothering the evil mining baron who works them to death with impunity? OH GOD THEY'RE SHAKING HANDS! OH. OH NO. THE HUMANITY!!!"

Not to mention the casual racism that isn't even subtle. "Those injuns live right over on the other side of that ridge! We gotta put a posse together to go kill their men and enslave their women and children."

"Ahh, so these are the bad guys. When are the heroes going to show up to stop them?" ... "Ohh noo, these are the "heroes"... 😫"

[–] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 6 points 9 hours ago

Coke adds life...

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 7 points 9 hours ago

[off topic]

"The Man Who Sold The Moon" by Robert Heinlein. Satire of big business written long before Sputnik. Am american hustler is raising money for a Lunar rocket. One of his pitches is that if the Soviets get there first they plan on putting a big hammer and sickle across the face of the moon.

Fun read.

[–] warm@kbin.earth 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

What about all the LEO internet satellites

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 1 points 6 hours ago

The night sky used to be sacred.