this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2026
323 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

85134 readers
4251 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] replicat@lemmy.world 5 points 47 minutes ago

I've been using it for well over a year now.

Hit my limit in 1 day and canceled.

[–] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 34 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

It wasn't profitable. This bait and switch was a long time coming.

Yup, the “first one is free” deal is always a trap.

[–] bigbangdangler@reddthat.com 50 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Sigh. None of this is surprising in the least. The cost of AI infrastructure and compute (coupled with the complexity of the chain) makes it prohibitively expensive.

It only has appeared cheap because of investor money flowing like Niagara on the off-chance that it could be made cheap enough to be profitable after getting everyone addicted to using it. I really don't think it's there, and it's definitely not cheap enough to continue flying for free much longer.

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 10 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

There will be some major bag holders soon. Who's is gonna be? The funnelers or the funnelees? How does MS bounce back having integrated copilot into everything?

[–] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 17 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (2 children)

Given the recent NASDAQ changes, looks like US pension funds will end up with the bag. What a scam.

Microslop can suck it.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 17 minutes ago

B- but the DOW 🥺

[–] BNE@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

So a massive wealth transfer - right after Covid, ANOTHER unprecedented wealth transfer.

Side question: when are you people in the imperial core going to do something about this with all that God given Liberty™ and Freedom® you continually bomb and destabilize the rest of us for?

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 6 points 1 hour ago

We got ourselves a keyboard warrior here.

[–] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 hours ago

Shakes Magic 8 Ball: Signs point to never.

[–] mech@feddit.org 28 points 7 hours ago

I have pro+ and I filed an FTC complaint when the billing change was announced and encouraged others to do the same, with the hope that it may lead to a class action settlement in the future.

Good luck, buddy!

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 10 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Not me. As soon as my boss said, "Use the tool thoughtfully," I pretty much don't use it at all anymore.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 13 points 4 hours ago

The most thoughtful way to use it.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] rekabis@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 hours ago

My reaction, exactly.

Would love to be a fly on the boardroom wall of any one of those companies which did massive layoffs “because AI”. Probably lowkey panicking on how to get their devs back.

[–] ryantown@lemmy.world 103 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah, what's the surprise here? Turns out it's expensive.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 4 points 1 hour ago

The surprise is that they're not continuing to throw VC money at it to bolster user numbers and mislead investors.

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 48 points 10 hours ago (9 children)

Microsoft was deceptive here and never made it clear exactly what sort of deal you were getting with the flat rate. There was no indication of the actual magnitude.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] teft@piefed.social 68 points 10 hours ago (7 children)

Man, enshittification is happening so fast for ai. Imagine the next big thing. It'll be enshittified prior to release.

[–] zurohki@aussie.zone 9 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Meta kind of did that with their VR stuff. They skipped the appealing to users part and build a bland, brand-safe, microtransaction-laden experience to sell to businesses assuming they could just use their size to force users to buy it.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 9 minutes ago

I think that's because Meta acquiring Oculus was the enshitfication.

[–] nightlily@leminal.space 8 points 5 hours ago

„Enshittified“ implies it was ever not shit.

[–] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 31 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

This isn't enshittification in the traditional sense, they haven't captured the market enough for that. They're just panicking because they're burning cash way too fast.

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

That word is only used correctly about 5% of the times it is used.

[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

Don't wanna be "that guy", but if if 95% of the time people use it to generally mean "greedy companies making things shitty to try and wring an extra buck", then that just is what that word means now.

It leaves a vacuum for the concept it was originally intended to describe, but that's how she goes.

[–] MycelialMass@lemmy.world 9 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Are suggesting the word itself has become enshittified?

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 hours ago

Interestingly enough, not the correct use for that word lol

[–] bhamlin@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

Quick, we need a word for enshittified enshittification!

[–] badgermurphy@lemmy.world 11 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

They forgot the first step where you make a great product that everyone's clamoring to use.

[–] spankysalmon@fedinsfw.app 1 points 4 hours ago

They did, if by "everyone" you mean rich detached executives that constantly make decisions they have not the intelligence to understand.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Stefan_S_from_H@piefed.zip 15 points 8 hours ago
[–] corbindallas@fedinsfw.app 2 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

vampires on a balcony.gif

me feeling pimp since ive always hosted my own runners

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 64 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

~~GitHub~~ Microsoft just switched Copilot to metered billing, and developers are watching months of credits vanish in a single day

[–] artyom@piefed.social 1 points 1 hour ago

Not sure if you don't realize this but those are the same company.

[–] dan@upvote.au 29 points 9 hours ago

They switched from heavily subsidizing it, to subsidizing it less. That's going to happen with the other providers, too.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dan@upvote.au 27 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

I'm not sure why anyone is surprised. The new pricing is closer to what it actually costs to provide the service.

They can't keep subsidizing AI forever. The same thing is going to happen to other providers too.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›