the atom bomb explosion looked like shit too because he wanted to do practical effects, like it just looks like a big pile of gasoline going off
this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2026
25 points (90.3% liked)
Movies & TV
23777 readers
122 users here now
Rules for Movies & TV Discussion
-
Any discussion of Disney properties should contain a (cw: imperialism) tag. If your post isn't tagged appropriately it will be removed.
-
Anti-Bong Joon-ho trolling will result in an immediate ban from c/movies and submitted to the site administrators for review.
-
On Star Trek Sunday only posts discussing how we might achieve space communism are permitted. Non-Star Trek related content will be removed and you will be temporarily banned until the following Sunday.
Here's a list of tons of leftist movies.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Should have just used archive footage honestly
practical effects
He does seem like the kind of douche to drop a nuclear warhead on a city for the sake of ‘art’
The frustrating thing is they did this really clever shot at the beginning by dropping a backlit sphere into some sand and it looked exactly like a slow motion of the fireball expanding, but then for the main thing they had that travesty. It was such an anticlimax.
Nolan is a dumb person's idea about a smart person, and is a perfect encapsulation of first year film bros. As a film teacher, i fuckin hate him and his movies, despite appreciating some of the things he does very well (shooting on film entirely, mostly practical effects). He's a dogshit writer, and not a great director. Dude should be a producer and stop pretending he's an auteur
A friend of mine called Christopher Nolan the Elon Musk of movies and I'm kind of inclined to agree.
That's a fair description
wise words
Big if true