this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2026
210 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

9941 readers
470 users here now

A community for Lemmy users interested in privacy

Rules:

  1. Be civil
  2. No spam posting
  3. Keep posts on-topic
  4. No trolling

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Wander@sh.itjust.works 3 points 15 hours ago

Privacy is ultimately lost isn't it?

It's just a matter of time before actual 1984 level prevention of wrong comments and everyone is going to be listened to all the time.

Whether AI grows quickly or slowly it will just add to it. Those with power will control it and it will reinforce their opinions and silence ours.

[–] underwater_ghouls77@lemmy.zip 16 points 23 hours ago

make Orwell fiction again

[–] dewritoninja@pawb.social 8 points 1 day ago

This is why I use a Linux box hooked up to a crt

[–] BrickEater@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago

I maintain that everyone who buys every pice of smart crap tech is a fucking idiot.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 3 points 22 hours ago

A note on what the partner list proves: Being listed in Bright Data’s config means an integration might have existed at some point. It does not by itself prove that a specific publisher’s currently-shipping app(s) includes the SDK in production. For any named publisher, per-app verification is required.

I'm not sure what this article is claiming is happening? My TV is browsing websites? Why haven't they proven it? Seems like it would be relatively simple to monitor the web traffic from the TV to see if that's happening, then they wouldn't put a disclaimer about it being unproven, Are they asking me to do the verification work for them?

[–] Baggie@lemmy.zip 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Feeling really happy that my tv lost internet privileges a while back

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I just double checked mine is cut off… it was

[–] Baggie@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago

Never hurts to double check, I'm envisioning a future where they have sim cards like cars do now.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Good thing I air gapped my TV.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Ehhh...yeah, maybe, but I think that the problem is really broader than that.

Petflix, a Roku app documented by The Verge, is a representative case. Its opt-in screen reads: “To enjoy Petflix for free with fewer ads, you are allowing Bright Data to occasionally use your device’s free resources and IP address to download public web data from the internet...

Say you have kids. And your kids have friends over. Are you curating what "free" apps your kids' friends have on their phones that they connect to your WiFi network?

[–] WhiteOakBayou@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

Those kids had to sit through the security PowerPoint before getting the Wi-Fi just like my kids did. If they fail the phishing test they comes around a week after the presentation they will not make it on my devices whitelist.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 3 points 1 day ago

I control all apps, so yes.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So they turned millions of TVs into a giant VPN? That would actually be kind of cool if they had asked first. I mean, imagine a torrent network like that.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 5 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

No, they're saying that it's technically possible for an Israeli company to have done this. The article says that an SDK exists, but there is no proof that it's being used in the way they're speculating about. They're Just Asking Questions (TM). But it's possible and mentioning an Israeli company makes certain people paranoid similar to how mentioning Warren Buffet makes certain people paranoid.

It's be relatively simple for security researchers to monitor the traffic from smart TV. But maybe all of the security researchers are working for the Israelis too. Can't prove that they aren't all working for the Israelis. Therefore we should just trust in what is implied by this one article that isn't even showing any network packets from any specific devices.

Just how internet conspiracy theories work. People tend to not question those that are Just Asking Questions so long those implicated in the conspiracy are people they hate.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago

Yeah I know, I'm just saying if somebody actually accomplished this it would be kind of cool (in a nerdy way but not politically).

[–] Fishnoodle@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (3 children)

So how do we disable/sabotage that feature?

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 31 points 1 day ago

Don't put your TV on the Internet

[–] Manxome@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

One approach per the article:

Approach 1: DNS block (trivial, effective for network-routed devices):

proxyjs.brdtnet.com
proxyjs.luminatinet.com
proxyjs.bright-sdk.com
clientsdk.bright-sdk.com
clientsdk.brdtnet.com

[–] Fishnoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

Nice, they were already blocked on my router

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Pardon my ignorance but how do you know what DNS server to block?

[–] Ok_imagination@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

In the article they have this info under defense approaches.

[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's not blocking a DNS server, it's using DNS to block their specific servers.

[–] manopor@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

I blocked them as wildcard domains on Android with app RethinkDNS.

[–] ArgentRaven@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

I've had great success with using a PC instead. My TV acts like a glorified monitor. I take an old PC, run Ethernet to it (Wi-Fi if it's capable) and install Linux mint for the PC's operating system. Windows works if you have a supported version. But since it's always an old PC, I just use mint. Then I get a cheapo wireless keyboard, and when I want to watch TV I wake the PC up from hibernation, turn on the TV and speakers, and I can use Firefox with Ublock origin to keep ads and tracking to a minimum.

I couldn't ever go back to using janky TV apps and being suspicious that it's watching/listening to me.

[–] Maroon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Probably a dumb question, but do these devices attempt to reach a specific domain? Can that domain be blocked with something like a PiHole or AdGuardHome?

[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

It's in the article.