this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2026
172 points (98.9% liked)

me_irl

7851 readers
3294 users here now

All posts need to have the same title: me_irl it is allowed to use an emoji instead of the underscore _

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] some_guy 8 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
  1. Short term investors who know it's a fraud and will get out leaving others holding the bag.

  2. Fucking morons who will be left holding the bag.

[–] chocrates@piefed.world 1 points 23 minutes ago
  1. a. Anyone moron with a retirement account
[–] areakode@riskeratspizza.com 32 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Do you have a retirement account? In that case, YOU! They bent all the rules (it bends really far if it's already broken), and now we get to fund the pump. The dump will come soon...

[–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

S&P rejected the proposal last I read.

12-Month "Seasoning": A company must trade publicly on a major exchange for at least 12 months. Got to wait until at least next year

Profitability: A company must report positive GAAP net income over the most recent quarter, and over the last four quarters combined. Starlink is profitable, and the rockets are almost break even. xAI, Twitter and all the other shit means a 5bn loss

Float Requirements: The company must have a sufficient amount of its shares available for public trading (at least 10%). SpaceX float was 4.3%. More shares need to be offered

[–] Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world 44 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (2 children)

Opportunists and fools,

in 3 weeks, most everyone.

And lastly, If you knew that the ~$10T USA 401k market would be forced to buy shares in a company with 5% float due to rule changes, you might see a bull case. I'm not touching it, but don't expect traditional value investing in a rigged system where too much concentrated wealth is sloshing around looking for the next big thing.

The market isn't for us anymore, it thinks we're for it

[–] BooBees@fedinsfw.app 14 points 5 hours ago

Ask not what the market can do for you..

[–] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

They decided not to do the rule change after so much backlash.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago

Idk, most recent news I've seen was just that the change had been challenged by a bunch of states but it hadn't been stopped yet

[–] darthsundhaft@piefed.social 28 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

I keep asking myself why I still see Teslas out on the road. Like who tf is still buying let alone owning one of those trash dumps? Like seriously.

What's even more stupid is that I keep seeing ads everywhere for Musk's stupid ass Star Link. Why is anyone in their right mind even bothering to take his ads? JFC. They have one job but they can't even stand up to corruption.

[–] iamericandre@lemmy.world 21 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I just saw a cyber truck with a temporary tag on it , meaning the asshole bought it less than 30 days ago. At this point it’s a deliberate choice

[–] errer@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

There’s a ton of them out there. Lotta idiots, lotta people who only care about themselves.

[–] Strider@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

Yes, right? I still have discussions about this. Teslas aren't so bad and so on. Wtf.

[–] trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world -3 points 4 hours ago

I keep asking myself why I still see Teslas out on the road.

Because cars are expensive and electric vehicles last quite a long time.

[–] abigscaryhobo@lemmy.world 20 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Unfortunately, with how "401k"s and broad banking and saving investments work, you are probably investing in SpaceX. Which is what makes it all the more concerning.

[–] protist@retrofed.com 7 points 4 hours ago

Totally this, all of us will be investing in SpaceX because they're setting us all up to invest in it unknowingly

[–] jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

No one in their right mind is investing in SpaceX. The business is hemorrhaging cash and the only part of it that is even remotely viable is StarLink.

And StarLink has some serious -- although currently unrealized --risks related to competition from fiber, which is and always will be technologically superior, and the increasing potential for a satellite to go crashing through someone's living room.

[–] ButtermilkBiscuit@feddit.nl 1 points 2 hours ago

Aside from the satellites comment, people said / say the same thing about Tesla. If you invested in Tesla the day it went public in 2010 you'd be 400x+ richer today.

To be clear, I'm not suggesting you invest in Tesla or spaceX, but the most successful investors separate morals from money. Does that make them bad people? Yes it does, but many get rich doing it that way.

[–] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Because they wanna be part of the grift.

[–] sanitation@lemmy.today 6 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

It's gonna collapse. Price 100% gonna collapse right after they get past the 401k raiding phase

[–] BagOfHeavyStones@piefed.social 2 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Because Starlink monopoly would be the only good reason I can think of.

[–] stretch2m@infosec.pub 2 points 3 hours ago

Most (85%) of their valuation is in AI and data centers in space. https://youtu.be/FPIGu0anfAE

[–] sanitation@lemmy.today 4 points 4 hours ago

China has 5 companies launching sats creating a similar network. That starlink monopoly is maybe for 1-2 more years. Russia is already launching a similar network for the military, I think about 1-2 months out for military use.

[–] gmtom@lemmy.world -2 points 3 hours ago

I'm giving it a minute, but then will be investing, regardless of what you think of Musk, SpaceX is an incredible company.