this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2026
198 points (98.1% liked)

World News

56600 readers
2286 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 57 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

even modernized, those planes are old. OLD old. They all used to be packed with vacuum tubes sort of old. The last one ever built left the assembly line in 1962. 64 years ago.

I mean even so we should've had them all replaced not only by now, but with some regularity. Every moving part should've been inspected she tested before this flight. Ffs, we still have 58 in active service!

I'm not saying they're perfect, but they are doing something right, and more care should've been taken before a test flight with civilians.

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

It’s the plane Slim Pickens flies in Dr. Strangelove

[–] itsjustachairmary@lemmy.world 5 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

One down, a bunch more to go, thank you for your service in getting rid of these

[–] Mpatch@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

Wat? There's like 3 more left. They are a museum piece.

[–] Melobol@lemmy.ml 39 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (8 children)

It is not immediately clear if there are any injuries.

Edit - newer info:

Monday afternoon, the base said eight people were on the aircraft during a routine test mission.
"Initial indications are that the crash was not survivable,"

Edit - latest info:

Eight people died after a B-52 Stratofortress crashed and burst into flames shortly after takeoff on a test mission Monday from Edwards Air Force base in California's Mojave Desert

[–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It’s not like there’s ejection seats but it would be fuckin wild if someone managed to jump out of the bomb bay.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)

bomb bay

It's been renamed to Mumbai

[–] extremeboredom@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It'd've been wild if someone had managed to jump out the Mumbai

[–] zeejoo@thelemmy.club 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Huh, TIL thanks. That’s just for flight crew though, I imagine the techs were in the bay with no idea

[–] zeejoo@thelemmy.club 2 points 6 hours ago

100% although 8 souls aboard is atypical. Crew usually consists of 5, all of whom can eject.

[–] Melobol@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So they don't have ejection seats.
That doesn't bode well.

[–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

I was wrong about that but only for the flight crew, it was designed to just carry a whole bunch of bombs so not a lot of passenger safety measures built in.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Dremor@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Well, that's a Boeing, so a small percentage of crashes are to be expected.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They were built so long ago that it was back when Boeing's engineering reputation was good.

[–] Dremor@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Well, unfortunately the current priorities may not be the same as it was then.

No matter how well something is built, if the maintenance is bad, you waste all that good engineering.

[–] Atropos@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Some of them are designed to not crash at all!

[–] PodPerson@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well did a wave hit it? Was it made with cardboard or any cardboard derivatives?

[–] non_burglar@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

So no paper?

[–] TheFrirish@tarte.nuage-libre.fr -3 points 18 hours ago

c/upliftingnews pun obviously intended get recked terrorist America.

[–] Ghoelian@piefed.social -2 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Wait what the hell is a Stratofortress? i only know that as the stratovarius song.

(I'm not allowed to view the article for some reason, access denied)

[–] Zidane@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 6 points 1 day ago (4 children)

What a wildly disproportionate-looking aircraft

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's because of the era it was designed it. It is from the dawn of the jet age. Jet engines weren't very powerful yet and they believed they had to have very thin and very swept wings to get the speeds they wanted. It was before thrust reversers so it uses drogue chutes. Its wings are too thin to support the weight of the craft so the main landing gear are in the fuselage and the wings droop so much they have the wheels on the wing tips. They were too afraid to have the weight of the plane and payload rotate on take off to the rear wheels so the flaps are so aggressive it actually takes off with a nose down attitude. The front wheels are the last to leave the pavement and the first to touch it. It's just a really strange design because they were still learning about jet design.

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

The aircraft is also permanently at takeoff attitude on the ground, the front landing gear is significantly longer than the rear. Also, both sets of main gear rotate, so it can crab down the runway, this is for landing in crosswinds.

Yeah, weird plane.

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

To be fair that's an upward angle on a plane taking off, with the flaps fully extended for maximum lift.

This is what a B-52 looks like when in a regular flight configuration.

[–] Murse@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's still kinda janky looking tbh. Like someone put a commercial airliner in MS Paint and just stretched everything away from where the wings meet the fuselage.

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago

Bombers tend to look like that, they have a very small fuselage compared to a passenger aircraft. Very compact cargo.

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There is a reason it has the nickname BUFF.

Big Ugly Fat Fuck.

[–] Gormadt@slrpnk.net 3 points 23 hours ago

But GOD can they fly!

...well not this one, not anymore. But usually.

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

It's because the cargo they're built to carry is very dense, hence the very slim fuselage.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

It's a flying fortress that flies in the stratosphere. Duh.

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

How the hell have you not heard of the B-52 stratofortress?

[–] Gormadt@slrpnk.net 5 points 23 hours ago

One of today's lucky 10,000?

[–] unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I realise that, but it's a very famous aircraft type.

[–] unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago

I thought the Stratofortress was just ten times bigger than a 747, and I worked in loading them shits topside and I ran the k[loader and oh!

The important points are: do not loiter in front of or behind of giant demonic turbines

Lol Jack Parsons was a roll sma-t shit

https://www.militaryfactory.com/aircraft/compare-aircraft-results.php?aircraft1=19&aircraft2=247

Edited. Possibly the badass name "Stratofortress" was subsumed

load more comments
view more: next ›