this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2026
346 points (98.3% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

40634 readers
3872 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Miller@lemmy.world 53 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

What it is actually saying is if you don't know how to gain access to edit this file you should not be editing this file.

[–] f314@lemmy.world 31 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

When I was a kid I deleted the system32.dll file on my grandfather’s computer because it showed up in some error message. It did in fact not solve the error 😅

[–] Miller@lemmy.world 41 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Strictly you stopped getting that particular error message.

[–] bequirtle@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I remember trying to mod a game from the xbox app, and couldn't edit even with trustedinstaller/takeown shenanigans. Turns out the files are encrypted so you can't even edit it from Linux. And if you disable encryption the game doesn't run :D

[–] WraithGear@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

that’s where the load bearing pineapple is saved

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 23 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Today I tried to wrestle my way with trusted installer... Went so far as to use psexec to make myself nt-authority\system and was still denied permission. ಥ_ಥ

[–] Toes@ani.social 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I've done that, did nt authority not work for you? It did for me on server 2008.

You might need to kill any processes with handles to it using process hacker.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

It was a DC using 2016 Essentials...And as it's being replaced by a new server soonish, it wont matter as much anyway.
I just hope it will limp along until then.

[–] mtpender@piefed.social 18 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Linux users: "I don't have such weaknesses."

[–] Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I wish. I spent 4 hours trying to get both I and docker to have permission to see my other drive. I finally gave up entirely and made a puid:guid that had access to everything short of root and put myself on that. It's still dubious as to whether that will work...

[–] pticrix@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 weeks ago

Just do it like a champ and run sudo chmod -R +777 / ! Who needs privilege access anyway?

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah I need to go in and get access to stuff I saved on my older distros/oses somehow

[–] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 1 points 2 weeks ago

Did you try :Z? Maybe SELinux was blocking you?

[–] Lumisal@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

Polkit asking you to type the password every few minutes when moving a bunch of files:

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

"You fool, I could sudo rm the whole drive right now. It's only out of my exuberant benevolence that I don't."

Later: me pressing the up key 38 times rather than type sudo apt update && upgrade

[–] skepller@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

When you learn Ctrl + R to reverse search you can't go back lol

[–] BOplaid@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 weeks ago

You mean remove the French language pack

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Immutable Distros joined the chat

[–] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Well, you can technically remove the immutable flag from files.. but I wouldn't

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Well, you can technically boot Windows into safemode or boot the install iso to modify the files owned by TrustedInstaller. But should you really do it?

[–] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 1 points 2 weeks ago

I also wouldn't, just like I wouldn't touch the immutable flag

[–] Zaphod@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

This is what made me switch to Linux

[–] BOplaid@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Actually Linux is far more well known than for example Windows for access denied stuff. Though bypassing it is a matter of putting sudo at the beginning of the command and putting your password in. In Windows you have to traverse through a bunch of dialogues... which isn't that hard but not as easy as the *nix approach.

[–] lemmy_get_my_coat@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

*when you run Windows:

[–] magnolia_mayhem@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Like an Indian movie, this file is RRR.

[–] SirHery@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Read ride remove. Or something.

[–] Eat_Your_Paisley@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

That's what chown is for

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Mastering file permissions is a big part of becoming Linux capable. And it essential to the "everything is a file" ethos. Wanna lock down an important file or program? chmod is a powerful ally.

Microslop has tried to adopt a half-ass elevated permissions scheme, but with lame-ass UAC and users who've no idea why Explorer doesn't have administrator rights on their administrator account.

[–] Viceversa@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

Windows' way is more convenient for me, than chmod:
windows allows you to regulate file access more granularly, more flexible - per any particular user , particular group.
Chmod can't do that.

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Either I don't understand your comment, or you don't understand chmod. What you describe ins't beyond chmod; it's the basic functionality of chmod.

[–] Viceversa@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Via chmod you can't configure access to some arbitrary group or user. You have only the owner user, owner group and everything else is crowded into one lump "other".

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

OP meant ACLs.
Which arent exactly straight forward in CLI in either Windows nor Linux.

[–] Viceversa@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

But it is pretty straightforward in the Windows GUI.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago

More or less.
Until you get into nested and inherited permissions ;) Then it get's really fun.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

setfacl can do.
It's just that some *NIX users want the stupid POSIX model and authenticating with user-ids (+ private keys) instead of proper usernames and password (and private keys).
Go figure /shrug

[–] Limonene@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

chmod can do 95% of everything I've ever needed, just with the "user" and "other" category. Private files, public-readable files, public read-write files, programs I compile but anyone can run... all that is just in the "user" and "other" category of chmod.

It gets 99% if you add the sticky bit (used on /tmp) and the "group" category. Serial ports are owned by root:dialout, and mode 660. To get serial port access, just add the user to the dialout group. For group assignments in college, each partner pairing had their own group they could use. Group work files were mode 660 so groups could edit each others' work, but other groups couldn't peek.

For the last 1%, use setfacl. It does everything that explorer.exe's security tab can do.

[–] UltraBlack@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Marc Uwe Kling would agree

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So? How the hell is it supposed to know that when you're trying to do things wrong? Would you rather it let any one do anything, so long as they control the mouse?

[–] ameen272@thelemmy.club 1 points 2 weeks ago

Yes. Fricking yes. Do we look like we care about Windows "protecting" us? No. Nobody actually does.