this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2026
140 points (99.3% liked)

Asklemmy

54645 readers
530 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In the case of YouTube, only after a few results they become completely unrelated to my search.

top 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 10 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Yes. I have regularly been using DDG, but would wind up using google sometimes anyway. Now I’m actively forced to use other engines because google is now a monetized results server and will return zero or no relevant results in favor or sponsored or monetized results.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 hours ago

Yet another on the endless list of reasons why capitalism is bad for humanity.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

I wonder what would happen if we all just signed off for the rest of the year.

[–] orenishii@lemmy.wtf 4 points 7 hours ago

Use something else like Kagi or duckduckgo

[–] garbage_world@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I use DDG, but search quality on google is unmatched

[–] CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml 1 points 32 minutes ago

In match in what sense? Because google has become nigh useless to me. I'm relying hard on LLMs to provide links because google never gives me any relevant response anymore -- and I'm not even talking about sponsored content here, which makes things worse in some cases

[–] celia@lemmy.today 2 points 7 hours ago

Yes! It's very hard to find alternatives to social media sites through google. Get choked in dozens of whiny blogs of 'social media isn't what it used to be' articles instead. Had to find duck duck go on yahoo then find alternative social media sites on duck duck go.

[–] KnightOfOldEmpire@lemmy.ml 7 points 12 hours ago

month on month, everything gets worse and more noise to filter out. Can't be the only one with this sentiment.

[–] godsammitdam@lemmy.zip 12 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

It's on purpose. The longer you scroll, the longer you're on the platform. That's higher engagement numbers and is used to expose you to/negotiate higher prices from advertisements.

[–] Archimedes@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

They want you to give up on search and ask their AI

[–] thevoidzero@lemmy.world 1 points 52 minutes ago (1 children)

I honestly think this is one of the reasons AI is so popular with people. We didn't notice because we have been using ddg, and adblocks. But searching for things in google, and finding any decent sites that's related and not shoving down ads all over the screen is hard to find.

Then people found something where they just search/ask things and get answers without any of the hassle. If you don't care about the source, or want to check multiple views then you have what you want. Specially because I think lot of people seem to use google to just find what they already have bias towards.

[–] CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml 1 points 28 minutes ago

I use AIs exactly as you're describing, but I ask for sources, which they're "ok" for.

They're bad at it too but in a way that make them useful to then extract the keywords google would expect (i.e, the response doesn't necessarily make sense, but at least I have some resources to form a question google can answer), while google doesn't seem to be able to give me proper results when I search by using words other than the exact matching keywords

Ironically, I'd spend more time on YouTube if I could find something I'd actually enjoy watching. If I find myself scrolling on end without finding anything good, I turn off the TV and go do something else.

[–] soratoyuki@piefed.zip 36 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's so bad. I keep searching topics on YouTube and getting 3-4 results before YouTube starts recommending videos based on past searches or past watched videos. Like, excuse me YouTube, what the fuck? You search what I tell you to search.

[–] CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

All the categories seems wildly divorced from what’s actually in them and half the time the category only suggests two videos… to me it feels like YouTube decides what you watch, today your suggestions are 90% old music videos, tomorrow a bunch of random machining videos, next day fail videos, rinse and repeat - obviously it’s based on your interests not mine but I’m sure everyone is having the same shitty experience

[–] JollyBrancher@sh.itjust.works 1 points 19 hours ago

Yep. And to think we lost Songza to Google Music. To YouTube music. To YouTube.

[–] troyunrau@lemmy.ca 8 points 19 hours ago

It's been bad for a few years already but it is getting worse. A good chunk of the internet isn't indexing anymore (places which require logins to get the content), and those that are largely exist to earn from the advertising, not to be helpful.

There's actually an opportunity for a disruptive force here. If you can be better at search than Google, you could steal users. But duckduckgo and related are mostly trying to be old Google rather than better Google.

[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 50 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Both have been prioritising "engagement" over "results" because it allows them to advertise to you more.

in case you didn't realise, if the product is free, you're the product and both have been doing an amazing job out of extracting value from your eyeballs.

Unsurprisingly, they're both owned by the same company.

[–] SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works 2 points 15 hours ago

The "results" portion they got rid of is credibility of the results based on cross linking i.e. people linking to useful resources. It was the thing that made Google the best search engine.

Noe they prioritise what sell the most ads as the top priority.

[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 7 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

Probably because it's prioritising what it thinks you're more likely to click on more than the actual search term. AI recommendations basically.

[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Which sucks when you're the kind of person that craves novelty. Just because I watched a nature documentary about sharks doesn't mean all I want to watch are shark videos. YouTube doesn't seem to understand that.

Thankfully, a lot of people gave really good suggestions when I made this Ask Lemmy post a few months ago. I'm still working my way down the list. Whenever YouTube search fails to give me something new or interesting, I check back on that page and pick a channel somebody suggested. Otherwise, the algorithm gets real stale, real quick.

[–] solrize@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Dunno about Google but Youtube seems to be making some things harder on purpose, like seeing the date of a video or showing search results in chronological order.

[–] finallymadeanaccount@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Extensions are your friend. I've had to install several just to make YouTube useable!

[–] CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago

If I need to go find something to make a service useable that’s my sign to not use the service.

[–] solrize@lemmy.ml 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I'd be interested to know if there's a way to fix this issue with extensions. Do you mean browser extensions? I use a browser sometimes and newpipe sometimes.

[–] finallymadeanaccount@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Not commnenting on the efficacy of the following for everyone, but they help me:

Disable Autoplay for YouTube https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/disable-autoplay-for-yout/dinkeiniijmpjehejhedbciaedblhnnk?pli=1

Return YouTube Dislike https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/return-youtube-dislike/gebbhagfogifgggkldgodflihgfeippi

U-Block Origin, obviously (still works fully on Brave Browser) https://ublockorigin.com/

Untrap for YouTube (Block YouTube Shorts & Remove Recommendations) https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/untrap-for-youtube-%E2%80%94-bloc/enboaomnljigfhfjfoalacienlhjlfil

YouTube Channel Blocker https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/youtube-channel-blocker/ghpibapiigafgbaolopljimengkfjofk

YouTube Upload Time https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/youtube-upload-time/nenoecmaibjcahoahnmeinahlapheblg

YTBlock - Block any content from YouTube https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/ytblock-block-any-content/nedcanggplmbbgmlpcjiafgjcpdimpea

Some of these probably cross over in what they do, but I can't be arsed delving into the nooks and crannies of them, so long as they do the job for me.

[–] celia@lemmy.today 1 points 7 hours ago

Nice list, appreciate it! Unlock Origin seems to still work on Firefox too.

[–] solrize@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 hours ago

Thanks, I don't see any of those fixing the functionality that youtube broke, but the effort is appreciated. The one that shows the upload time only says you can use it while watching the video, but that time is shown in the text blurb if you click "more...". And it makes a network request, of course. I'm using firefox so ublock origin still works for blocking ads.

It also feels like some pages in top results didn't even exist before I made the search. They are filled with generic babble about the subject without ever going to details or conclusions. Dribble that no human would ever write

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 8 points 1 day ago

I just love how YouTube has a "show unwatched" button in its search that usually shows me videos I have watched multiple times.

[–] Zen_Shinobi@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm annoyed that YT got rid of the search by newest first option. At least Rumble has it still

[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

That feeling when you're trying to browse through a creator you like's page for videos you haven't seen yet, but you have to scroll past the dozens and dozens of things you've already watched, which each take time to load their thumbnails, making the task drag on for ages.

[–] Zen_Shinobi@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Yeah, the recommended videos is completely broken. It used to be good.

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Rumble, which hosts ‘truth’ social’s cloud services…

[–] Zen_Shinobi@lemmy.world 0 points 20 hours ago

Either this or YT. The gaming side of Rumble is fairly normal and apolitical with decent comment and views. I really with someone would buy Rumble out and make it into a normal video hosting site instead of all this MAGA propaganda.

Peertube is so divided that it's nearly impossible to find or post. Bitchute sucks and is filled with view bots, reposters (myself included), and 0.1% of users that comment. Odysee is a pain in the butt to use as a video site. Why do I need points to comment on a video? Also not a lot of traction on it. TikTok if you enjoy being banned or censored for pro-LGBTQ+ anti-China, or too fat, not to mention that it's spyware.

I might have missed a couple, but we're screwed as uploaders.

Yes. It’s becoming shittier everyday.

[–] Fishnoodle@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Use duckduckgo and turn off ai results. Problem solved.

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago

no-ai duckduckgo is one url away:
https://noai.duckduckgo.com/

[–] JakenVeina@midwest.social 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yup. I had this exact thought YESTERDAY, when I did a search for the name of a GitHub project I needed to read up on (I forget which project), with a couple keywords, and the GitHub page wasn't even IN the top results. Later, I was doing a search for a quoted phrase, which of course is supposed to guarantee that the phrase appears, verbatim, in the results, and found that NONE of the results contained that phrase.

And no, I wasn't looking at the AI results, I've got those removed with a plugin.

[–] CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago

I was trying to find an anklet, obviously size matters if it’s intended to fit my body and I put “eight inch anklet” in quotes along with a few other adjectives and it flat out ignored it and gave me mostly 9” because that’s the standard size of an anklet… wtf is even the point

[–] ultranaut@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago

Yes, it is one of the main reasons I started paying for Kagi. Google search is designed first and foremost to serve you up to advertisers who pay Google.

[–] garbagehead@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

It's all monetization directed, no matter what. Boolean search is gone.

[–] ILikeToMeow@lemmy.ml -3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

That is why I've started using Deepseek as a replacement for searches, the proven tract record and successes of the Communist Party of China to improve people's lives make tech out of China OVERWHELMINGLY more trust worthy then tech out of the blood soaked Capitalist Imperialist threat to all humanity that is the US ruling class (and those who currently serve them) (and the US itself for as long as it hasn't yet overthrown the Capitalists (basically the Billionaires, and now also a F**king Trillionare.)) (it's almost like I'm writing code lol, I should try to make my writing style more consistent or something)

[–] nerdhd@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

I like your spirit, but you went just a little overboard with the rant. I'm saying this just in case you are in doubt about why you are being downvoted, because I get downvoted often and I always get left wondering why it happened. Cheers.

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

Search has been becoming smarter for years (decades?) by now.

The problem is that search has been made to work with the "you know what I mean" factor... fixing spelling mistakes, considering different tenses or forms of words, including related words...

Search became more friendly to the average non-technical user, but it became harder for users who know/knew how to search for exactly what they want.

Other factors include...

  • Search Engine Optimization (SEO) where websites try to appear for as many searches as possible, occasionally regardless of relevance
  • Monetization of search, where people with SEO and a lot of money pay to be included in as many "relevant" searches as possible
  • AI incorporated into search by trying to find additional relevant pages
  • Search engines being reluctant to return zero (or few) results and padding the results with other things you "might be interested in"
  • Also, search trying to use what you "might be interested in" based on what they know about you/your account/your IP address/your location based on your IP range.
[–] CryptoKitten@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

What bugs me — and Apple Music is guilty of this too — is when I search for an indie or eastern song and it only shows popular results from the west.

Marvis Pro, a feature rich front end for Apple Music, knows my favourite musicians or bands are ONE OK ROCK, Enya, and Nightwish. I don’t want American Top 40 trash. But it still pushes that stuff.