this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2026
867 points (98.9% liked)

Political Memes

12045 readers
2453 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 hours ago

Half the time I have this argument IRL, they go mask-off and say it's because of race.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

It's more like 30%, the rest of us would gladly take a standard of living boost. But FoX News, OANN and every other disinformation factory have brain washed a lot of people.

[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world -2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

The far right thinks Norway is "communist". The far left thinks Norway is "not capitalist".

Both are wrong.

[–] frisbird@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

What? The far left knows that Norway is capitalist.

[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world -2 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

The far left thinks "capitalism" is a bad word the way the far right uses "communism".

Democrats are having fights right now over whether they're capitalists or socialists and it's so fucking stupid. Pointless arguments that hand the country to the right.

Incredibly important midterms coming up and we seem more interested in attacking each other than defeating Republicans.

[–] frisbird@lemmy.ml 1 points 17 minutes ago

The far left doesn't think capitalism is a bad word. They think it's a failed system.

Democrats are currently demonstrating exactly what their role is in society - protect the fascist right from a left-wing challenge. Democrats are the moderate wing of fascism, just like they were in Germany a century ago

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

DSA are not anti capitalist. They are barely left leaning by the standards of the rest of the world.

The real fight being had are between corporatists and populists.

[–] frisbird@lemmy.ml 1 points 18 minutes ago

The DSA are anti-capitalist based on their own writings. Their electoral wing is clearly not anti-capitalist and there's a huge pro-capitalist social democracy camp within DSA, but the organization is rhetorically anti-capitalist.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

In the US, we are under a massive oligarch-owned far-right propaganda machine that dominates social media and television viewership.

It works so well that rich people in other countries are trying to adopt the same model as a means of popular control.

[–] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

Oh shit. I don't know why that hadn't occurred to me before 😂

Our cultural imperialism is exporting rebellion and the destruction of civilization.

Damn, that whole great American satan thing hits different.

[–] Ravenheart@lemmy.zip 9 points 20 hours ago

To admit that other countries do better would be to violate the dogma of American exceptionalism. It would be to offend the inflated ego of the most brainlessly egotistical among us. And I guess they think their feelings matter more than their own wellbeing.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 11 points 22 hours ago

That tattooed walrus moron has always repulsed me on a visceral level.

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If socialism "never works" I'd say it's in the same boat as democracy.

[–] Kaput@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Social democracy managing capitalism is rather Nice. Freedom of making profits while providing a strong social net.

Or rather capitalism whithin a social democracy. Population shoulf dictate the rules

[–] Miaou@jlai.lu 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

The US used to be much better than any European country when it comes to inequalities. Look at things now.

When politicians and capital-owners are able to collude, you end up with oligarchs. And so far every social democracy out there has some. It's just a matter of time until we all get our Reagan/Thatcher

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 41 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Recently my lead hypothesis is that many people would rather personally suffer and die if it means that black people have it worse. I read "dying of whiteness" recently, and it's haunting. "It's socialism" is just a coded way of expressing that.

[–] Lyrl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Broadly, humans are happier when they have more than their neighbors. Having the biggest house in the neighborhood strongly correlates with increased happiness. Having a McMansion in a neighborhood full of other McMansions leaves people no happier, on average, than having an average mobilehome in a mobile home park. (Free public radio audio coverage, links to Washington Post text article: https://www.marketplace.org/story/2026/01/13/why-larger-homes-dont-lead-to-more-happiness)

In the US, having black people be "the ones with less" that makes people of other races get that "better than my neighbor" happiness boost is structurally convenient, but other groups fill that need in other cultures. Jews and communists are other common targets in Western cultures, all non-Japanese get the treatment in Japan, the Tutsis in Rwanda, the eastern ethnic groups in Russia, and on and on. This hugely common psychological tendency is damaging to creating broadly prosperous societies, but hopefully the learnings from the studies of it will help us create strategies to structurally counteract it.

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago

Drained-pool politics.

TLDR: Whites in some parts of America drained public pools rather than integrate them. They should rather no one have a public pool than have to share it with black people.

[–] artwork@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (3 children)

I am sorry, but this is so strange to read and realize how different some people worldviews are...

Due to the job requirements, I travel a lot, and though I've been just for 2 months in USA accumulated, in Europe and Asia, I've met just two people with similar worldviews in around 14 years of travelling...

Everyone else I know, and I, would just not care about the color or race, or be fascinated how unique people are, and would never even be so awful towards these people to the point of being basic horrible, sorrowful racists... as you described... but just default to the understanding and believe that people were born around the world whenever they could, inheriting the local inheritance, traditions, culture, and family, and they are still people with infinitely magnificent Souls and equal rights to live and just be... human...
They would trust in people, and that it's always possible to find compromise with each other, explaining issues and finding solutions.
That is, to be humans, and trust in human, as an ineffably magnificent opportunity to be alive... and explore the infinite world...

Sorry. No... Yours is absolutely not, even remotely not the way to see and live the world... I believe, and never will. Your worldviews are utterly... sorrowful, unfair, hateful, dark, and simply, sorry, disgusting...

It's darkening to know that you live with these believes out there... and I would recommend you travelling... Please do consider discovering the world out there... to live...

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Are you trying to say acclaimed book "Dying of Whiteness" ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dying_of_Whiteness ) is invalid because of your personal experiences?

I'm sorry but there's a large body of evidence that many people in the US are deeply racist. Not always in a "wear a hooded costume" overt way, but in more polite and dressed up to look inoffensive ways as well.

You can also read the new Jim Crow and "the color of law".

[–] artwork@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

I appreciate the effort you invested into point out the references, but I am sorry, I'll pass, because I do not want to participate in this sorrow in any way, including additional knowledge of human humiliation based on the way they were born.

Simply put, I consider it stupid, inhuman, and not worthy my life time. What I would like to invest time instead is to read and know about the way people find compromises, mutual respect, and solution solving in long term.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

You'll participate whether or not you desire to. Knowledge will better equip you to engage with the world, good and bad, as it is. But it's your choice. I'm not your professor.

[–] artwork@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Thank you! I wish you safety, stability, and peace!

[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Do you know the history of black people in America? You know about chattel slavery? That wasn't really that long ago.

[–] artwork@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Yes, the USA's filmography is very known around the world, with many ineffably sorrowful issues depicted, yet I have no idea why modern people do still continue behave the same, or even worse way.
And I do not want to even know more about this indescribably sorrowful, stupid, and simply inhuman attitude towards people being born in different way they likely didn't even chose how, where, and when, yet now are being humiliated for what? For being born? Get yourself together already, humans, if you still are... humans...

[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 hours ago

Film isn't an accurate portrayal of history. The history of racism in America is much worse than films would ever indicate.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 8 hours ago

You are extremely naive to the nature of racism in the US.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] criticon@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 day ago (3 children)

My (millionaire boomer) Uncle from Mexico recently shared this (sorry for quick translation using gemini). There are brainwashed people everywhere

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 8 hours ago

They are so terrible at anything artistic... I mean just look at that shit. Just awful, from a purely artistic point of view.

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 3 points 15 hours ago

Gotta love that Axolotl.

I see small kids with plushie axolotls these days. For some reason this animal has entered the headcanon of preschoolers around the world.

This unfortunately, some people are too far gone

[–] vzqq@lemmy.blahaj.zone 58 points 1 day ago (4 children)

They are also absolutely floating in oil wealth.

[–] mirshafie@europe.pub 30 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Norway is a stupid example. Sweden, Denmark, Finland and Iceland easily have the same level of welfare or arguably better than Norway in many regards. The key is to make public investments into the country's resources (be it farmland, forestry, mines, electricity) and build infrastructure and institutions that benefit the people.

By investing directly, you are doing the thinking instead of deferring judgement to bankers and the "invisible hand" that's really just a bunch of rich dudes with their own incentives that don't align with yours. You cut out billionaire middlemen and money doesn't have to "trickle down", and you can steer the behavior of your industries and universities toward causes that take your country's needs over time into account.

That's how good investors think about their business empires - why should countries choose to not strategize at all and just let nature do its thing?

[–] Lyrl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

The World Bank had a 1993 report that basically concluded government industrial policy was to be avoided if the goal was to grow wealth broadly. This guided (or was representative of the views of people in power) decisions on international aid and other conditional support to developing countries for decades.

Leaving development of industry and technology deployment entirely to the private market economy didn't work. Countries with the highest average standards of living, or the most improvements in standard of living, have had significant government guidance of the major industries in their economy. Only this year has the World Bank issued a new report acknowledging this: https://www.bu.edu/gdp/2026/04/24/from-paradigm-maintenance-to-paradigm-shift-a-mood-change-on-industrial-policy/

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 4 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (2 children)

Finland

We're currently suffering from the nazis-in-government disease. Of course social services are still better than in, say, the US, but we had a decisive downwards trend in the past 2 years. Plus scandals. TBH I don't think they'll get re-elected.

And I'm sure many Swedes and Danes would have something similar to say about their own government. Maybe even Norwegians? Idk. My point, "socialist" Nordic countries are not immune from the scurge.

[–] myrrh@ttrpg.network 1 points 7 hours ago

...fascist propaganda, governance, and nationalistic zero-sum resource hoarding are trending globally; i fear it's only a matter of time until regional conflicts escalate into global warfare...

[–] mirshafie@europe.pub 3 points 15 hours ago

Absolutely. I can only speak for Sweden but we have massive problems.

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 79 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

All the other scandinavian countries that don't swim in fossil fuel wealth are still doing pretty well, though. Also, lots of countries that are rich in natural resources don't actually let the majority of their population participate in that wealth.

[–] vzqq@lemmy.blahaj.zone 37 points 1 day ago

Oh yeah, good on them for managing their oil wealth in a way that benefits their society.

They could also have been like the UAE. Or the US.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] xxxb@feddit.org 6 points 23 hours ago

This is so true not just for Americans. Norway is such an amazing country.

load more comments
view more: next ›