this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2026
578 points (99.7% liked)

News

38306 readers
2191 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Trump fired all three remaining members of the U.S. Election Assistance Commission on Thursday, abruptly disabling the only federal agency devoted solely to election administration at a moment when Trump has sought to reshape federal voting rules.

The two Democratic commissioners, Thomas Hicks and Benjamin Hovland, were notified by email. “On behalf of President Donald J. Trump, I am writing to inform you that your position as Commissioner of the Election Assistance Commission is terminated, effective immediately. Thank you for your service,” the email said. It was signed by Morgan DeWitt Snow, deputy director of presidential personnel in the Executive Office of the President.

The third commissioner, Republican Christy McCormick, was allowed to resign, according to three sources within the agency. McCormick declined to comment when reached by phone. The agency’s fourth commissioner, Republican Donald Palmer, voluntarily departed the agency earlier this year to join the Heritage Foundation.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 hour ago

I never thought in my lifetime the United States would need "International Observers".

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 20 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Welp.

We lived long enough to see America become a 3rd world shithole.

Edit: Don't care if I get banned. This traitor's head needs to be on a pike.

[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 hours ago

Always was.

[–] brezel@piefed.social 45 points 6 hours ago (5 children)

i think it's so funny how americans think they live in a democracy while one guy just fires whomever he wants.

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 hours ago

Yeah we in the rest of the world call that a "dictatorship" m'dudes.

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 9 points 3 hours ago

It was a lot easier to believe the illusion before the Orange Don.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

i think it's so funny how americans think they live in a democracy

Not just any 'ol democracy, but the bestest one ever!!1!!

[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 hours ago

And validated as just fine by the unelected supreme court.

Good times.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

It would be incredible and one hell of a historic moment if the Orange Pedophile's reign, which has exposed all our system's flaws, actually resulted in us plugging those holes and updating our political machine to prevent this all from happening again.

But the bottom line is that would require voter action and Americans are dogshit stupid.

[–] brezel@piefed.social 1 points 2 hours ago

i would wholeheartedly wish such a change for you guys.

[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Plug the holes of centuries of murder and pillage? Can you fix all the countries you've invaded or couped since WWII? Can you bring back all the dead fisherman or those 200 little girls trump killed this year? Can you bring back all the Iraqis, Afghanis, Vietnamese or Koreans?

Fuck your country, man.

[–] BouteilleBrune@lemmy.world 22 points 6 hours ago

he's setting himself up for a coup from a general, at this point it could really happen

[–] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 18 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Fired the Democrat, but "allowed the Republican to resign". That is some petty shit. Not that it surprises me coming from Trump and the hairs he has hanging on to his balls like DeWitt.

Can't wait to see how much phantom voter fraud his administration uncovers exclusively in states run by people Trump personally doesn't like. With no mention of how they know there is any fraud to begin with since it seems like they have fired everyone on the Federal side that had any direct insight into elections with this announcement.

I'm sure someone in the media will get right on that line of thought when the time comes. /s

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Well they haven’t found fraud yet, have they? They need to be replaced with people who will find “fraud”, who will get the necessary votes, and disregard votes where there were “illegal immigrants” ….. you can tell because they speak Spanish

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 23 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Really interested to know why nobody near this guy has any spine whatsoever.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Easy, they're conservatives/regressives.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Plenty of people near him have a spine. They just aren't your friends

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

Doubtful anyone near him has a spine. They all fold faster than superman on laundry day. Even when it harms them.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 14 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Free elections...Russian style

[–] Faithless@lemmy.world 28 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Directly from the authoritarian playbook

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 29 points 9 hours ago (7 children)

Dude is trying to steal the next election and install himself as king, amd we're all just shrugging our shoulders. Let's see how that works out for us.

[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

So he'd have to overturn the 22nd amendment.

Let's say he does.

Plot twist: Obama runs against him.

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Plot twist: one drop law passed so only 100% white people can run

Plot delay: 1 year lost arguing how white italians and irish are

Plot double cross: everybody is disqualified

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Probably how it's working out for Russian citizens.

We're a pretty stupid and servile society of people. I don't see that going well for us going forward.

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Time to buy that popcorn stock.

That will save my 401k!

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago

lets dont see, and get up off the couch to do what it takes to remove him

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 36 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (3 children)

Thanks SCOTUS!

This right here is the final straw. Cancelling the independence of federal agencies will turn this nation into a capitalist MAGA shithole faster than anything else he's done.

I used to believe that we needed to add 4 seats to SCOTUS, but I no longer believe that. Now I believe that we need to add at least 20 seats to SCOTUS, with rolling term limits. The count shouldn't be so close that one bad faith president can negatively manipulate policy for the next century. It should include rolling term limits, so every president gets to appoint a few, but not enough to steer the direction of the court.

We have to strengthen the independence of the three branches of government, and this is how we do it for SCOTUS.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 hours ago

This right here is the final straw.

LOL.

I'll believe that when I see the majority of americans stand up and fight back in any meaningful way.

 

I would be so happy for my cynicism to be proven wrong - to see Trump, his lackeys and his puppeteers stopped.

But I don't expect that to happen.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 5 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

The whole US government needs term limits.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 49 points 11 hours ago

This is it. His big move. It's all out in the open now and the endgame is midterms. C'mon citizens of all stripes, choose neighbourhood reps to watch and video all the polling booths on election day. You'll need that insurance.

[–] PlaidBaron@lemmy.world 14 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Who has 'Americans will do nothing to stop it' on their bingo card?

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Either won't stop it or actively encourage it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 34 points 11 hours ago (6 children)

They should still show up to work and do their jobs. I highly doubt they answer directly to the executive branch, or that the president even has the power to terminate them.

How were they selected in the first place? Are they elected, appointed, or hired? By whom? These are the questions that matter.

If they report to Congress, then I'm guessing at a minimum that it would take an act of congress to fire them. Not that republicans wouldn't do it if trump asks, but there's a narrow enough majority that a few spoiler votes could block it.

We need to stop letting trump get away with usurping the powers of the other branches of government.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Unfortunately, appointed by the president so firing them may be legit. Another power grab and the foundation for a fixed election but legit

Assuming Congress was willing to use their authority, the check against this is they must be approved by the senate.

There needs to be a quorum of 4 to do anything, so they already couldn’t legally

There’s no mechanism for temporary or acting commissioners, but that has been a common Drump strategy to circumvent Congress. Just declare an acting one, then when the confirmation period expires, declare a new acting one

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 21 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (10 children)

JFC, you are so behind the times. The fact that you are getting upvotes is scary. Obviously, many people don't know that American life as they know it, was effectively destroyed a week ago.

Remember the other day, when there was all that talk about Birthright Citizenship being BARELY upheld by SCOTUS? A case that was so obvious that it NEVER should have been brought, to say nothing making it all the way to the SCOTUS, where it inexplicably had 4 votes against it?

That vote was a red herring, a distraction. The important case, the one that got 10% of the coverage of Birthright Citizenship, was the one that struck down the independence of nearly EVERY independent agency (over 2 dozen) that regulates EVERYTHING in our country. Now the president can fire anybody, in any agency, for any reason. ALL government regulation is now in the hands of Donald Trump.

That means pharmaceuticals, food, air, water, transportation safety, roads, buildings, mail, workplace safety, etc. literally EVERYTHING in this country that requires regulations to remain safe, are up to Donald Trump. So if the meat industry wants to pay off Donald Trump to loosen safety standards, he'll take the bribe, and let them write their own rules, and we'll be eating horsemeat and dogmeat labelled as beef, and it will be perfectly legal, so don't bother to sue.

BTW, the ONLY agency that SCOTUS protected was the Federal Reserve, which was the one agency Trump really wanted to get his hands on. But the Sociopathic Oligarchs who make these decisions were smart enough to keep the MONEY out of Trump's hands. They WANT him to fuck up everything else, and make our lives miserable, but they aren't going to let him fuck up THEIR money.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 12 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

Didn't the supreme court just give him power to fire certain people he couldn't before?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 20 points 10 hours ago (5 children)

Civil disobedience is probably one of the best tools of resistance at this point. If he's doing blatantly antidemocratic stuff, his orders no longer carry democratic legitimacy and should not be followed. They only have weight if people obey. Sure, he might send someone to remove them from office forcibly, but it would contribute to cracks in his image of power.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 7 points 8 hours ago

Ah and so it begi… ends.

load more comments
view more: next ›