this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2026
25 points (100.0% liked)

mutual_aid

22070 readers
92 users here now

Users cannot assume that any post has been vetted and must do their own investigation.

RULES:

  1. All mutual aid requests must go in this community.
  2. Mods do not vet individual mutual aid requests. Donate at your own risk.
  3. Do not request donations for funding anything explicitly illegal.
  4. Comments giving unsolicited advice will be removed. (See below)
  5. Comments or posts that are critical of any mutual aid post or user will be removed. (See below)
  6. Posts containing opsec leaks will be removed.

Additionally:

Moderator Pinning Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I have been in the camp of being hands off in regards to cracking down on potentially scammy behavior in this comm due to the potential of depriving others of life saving aid.

But I do believe that there could be some basic guardrails put in place that could rebuild some trust and prevent scamming.

  1. account must be a certain age to post here (maybe a minimum of 3 months or something) brand new accounts that ask for donations immediately upon creation could be banned until they reach that account age.

  2. account must have some history of posting outside of the mutual aid comm, enough posting history to build a level of trust. I think we should primarily give to people who are active participants in the site, as it helps us validate their authenticity.

Addendum: exceptions can be made, such as in instances of accounts designed to fundraise for our Palestinian comrades, but they'd need approval by site admins or comm moderators.

I think these requirements are basic enough to filter out more aggregious attempts to scam the community while not providing an insurmountable barrier to aid.

Even if not implimented as comm rules, I think its good practice to take these things into consideration before donating to anyone on here.

If anyone has other proposals that could make sure donations are more likely to go to members of the community instead of scammers, I would like to hear them.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RiotDoll@hexbear.net 2 points 20 minutes ago

Make "once a day" a hard rule

I don't want to over explain this, i think the benefit is obvious. It drastically limits what scammers can do.

You get one shot per day (date not hour count who cares THAT much)

That can suck if you're in need but you ask once a day, make your case, and at least if people find you beneath help or scamming it isn't breaking the comm

That plus what's suggested in the op

Hard enforcement of once-a-day

For real no scammer will thrive that choked

[–] MiraculousMM@hexbear.net 7 points 3 hours ago

+1

I too have tried to stay hands off when it comes to suspicious behavior, simply because you never know what someone is going through or how desperate they are and the user consensus last time definitely echoed that sentiment. But it seems like we may need some small extra safeguards to filter out the worst bad actors and help people feel comfortable donating.

[–] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 8 points 4 hours ago

Yeah I move to second this idea. I get it it's really rough out there, but people have been coming in here with zero community engagement asking for money and it's scared off others from asking for help. It's a tough call, because no one should go without aid, but on the other hand, gotta defend yourself.

[–] FourteenEyes@hexbear.net 7 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

All of this sounds good and I know the rules for the comm were made in good faith but they did make it more difficult to call out stuff like this

[–] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Should this be moved to feedback?

[–] spectre@hexbear.net 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Good point, I think the conversation can start here until a proposal is developed (shouldn't be too hard) and then taken to feedback at that point.

[–] bloogoose@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Regardless of rules you're going to have scammers. For every real person that needs help you'll have 10 that are just preying on people's emotions.

[–] spectre@hexbear.net 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

It would be ideal to move in a direction thag changes the ratio from 9-in-10 toward like 2-in-10 or something.

[–] bloogoose@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

You're asking for people to change and that's not likely to happen.

[–] space_comrade@hexbear.net 6 points 2 hours ago

What are you on about? It's not about making people change, it's about filtering out at least the very low effort scammers.