this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2026
275 points (98.9% liked)

movies

3656 readers
579 users here now

A community about movies and cinema.

Related communities:

Rules

  1. Be civil
  2. No discrimination or prejudice of any kind
  3. Do not spam
  4. Stay on topic
  5. These rules will evolve as this community grows

No posts or comments will be removed without an explanation from mods.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

So far all their live remakes have flopped, why do they continue this shit

[–] TheImpressiveX@piefed.social 3 points 6 hours ago

So far all their live remakes have flopped

Aladdin, Lion King, and Lilo & Stitch have all been financial successes.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 7 hours ago

We. Don’t. Need. To. Live. Action. Every. FUCKING. Thing.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 hours ago

We need a live action Jetsons on ice.

[–] nightlily@leminal.space 1 points 8 hours ago

If you want a live action Moana, go watch Whale Rider instead. It’s a heavy inspiration and a much more authentic and better movie.

[–] hal_5700X@sh.itjust.works 49 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
  • Makes an live-action version
  • It's 90-95% CGI

What's the point?

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 21 points 22 hours ago

From that studio that gave you "Live Action" Lion King.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 hours ago

Well, it seems Supergirl was way more popular in it's reportings of failure. Supergirl wins this one. I wonder if The Odyssey or Ulysses or whatever it's called will bring people back to the theater? I stopped going decades ago but I'll be going to see this one.

[–] DJKJuicy@sh.itjust.works 33 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (3 children)

I mean...I already watched this movie like 10 years ago. I know what happens already.

OK, Maui is now The Rock in a muscle suit and a wig. But most of the new movie is CGI. The original movie was also animated. Why do I need to watch the new one?

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 4 points 11 hours ago

At least with the lion king there was a 25 year gap between the two movies so the target audience would've been entirely different generations.

But Moana 2 came out 2 years ago. Anyone who watched it, probably watched the first one beforehand, even if we're talking about a 5 year old in 2024 who wasn't around in 2016 - the kid's parents would've probably pirated or streamed it to watch before going to the movies to see Moana 2.

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 6 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Also, The Rock's acting in the trailers looked... stiff as a rock

But seriously, he doesn't have the charisma of the original Maui

[–] serendepity@lemmy.world 10 points 21 hours ago

Which is funny because he voiced the original Maui too. I guess the animators did a lot of work to sell his voice acting.

[–] thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world 6 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Honestly I didn't even realize it had been that long till you said it.

10 years is still to early for a "live action" (even though it's basically just animation) remake.

They would have made more money doing frozen

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 7 points 22 hours ago

They would have made more money doing frozen

The CinemaSins video on the trailers suggested making a live action remake of Atlantis. That would sell like gangbusters, but Disney has spent the last 20 years pretending it didn't exist

[–] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago

I didn't even know it was coming out and even after seeing this post I still don't care enough to click the article

Feels fucking good leaving this nasty-ass comment though haha

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 165 points 1 day ago (2 children)

There is a beautiful version of Moana already. I can't imagine needing to see this. I don't hate these remakes for existing, but I just don't see the point.

[–] mereo@piefed.ca 32 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Studios don't like risks nowadays. So they'd rather remake successful past movies.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 59 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Apparently it's not as risk-free as they thought.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Tiresia@slrpnk.net 30 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Ah yes, losing $100,000,000 seems very low-risk.

[–] blartcap_@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

If they thought they had a good chance of losing that much money, they wouldn't have made the movie. The news here is more about how their risk calculations were off.

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 1 points 25 minutes ago

And now they realise it isn't risk free after all.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BigShammy80@feddit.org 46 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No one does... any why should they? The classic disney films are great, they don't need remakes...

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 40 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I wish someone re-mastered the Donald duck and Goofy driving instructional/documentary videos/movies

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] troed@fedia.io 111 points 1 day ago (1 children)

My daughter loves the Moana movies. I've told her about this one - and the anti-excitement of "the same movie but with actual persons" is quite obvious. I can only conclude that no actual parents were involved in its inception.

[–] Nangijala@feddit.dk 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Friend, I am positively obsessed with mermaid movies. I have watched some of the worst movies in existence, just to watch mermaids flop around in water and look pretty. I didn't even bother with the live action remake of the little mermaid. It looked so fucking shit, I couldn't even pretend to care. And I also didn't understand them casting Halle, because she's such a soft an gentle soul and not at all like Ariel. Her sister, Chloe would have been a better Ariel because she has that similar spark of defiance in her that Ariel needs (I used to watch their youtube channel back in the day because I liked their singing). But eh, I guess. I'm just glad that Halle had an overall good experience with the film and that her career appears to be going well.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 10 points 23 hours ago

Feels pretty disrespectful to the audience of the original, like “you watched an animation but it’s a real movie now!”, except the real movie is just as much an animation.

[–] carbonari_sandwich@piefed.social 65 points 1 day ago (20 children)

Here's my pitch: Let's animate the live action Disney movies. They have these properties to draw from, and instead of making a live-action remake of them like Freaky Friday or Herbie, or a sequel like Hocus Pocus or Mary Poppins Returns, reinvent it as an animated feature.

  • 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea (1954)
  • The Shaggy Dog (1959)
  • Pollyanna (1960)
  • The Absent-Minded Professor (1961)
  • The Three Lives of Thomasina (1964)
  • Bedknobs and Broomsticks (1971)
  • Escape to Witch Mountain (1975)
  • The Cat from Outer Space (1978)
  • Honey, I Shrunk the Kids (1989)
  • White Fang (1991)
  • The Rocketeer (1991)
  • Newsies (1992)
  • The Mighty Ducks (1992)
  • The Adventures of Huck Finn (1993)
  • Cool Runnings (1993)
  • Blank Check (1994)
  • Heavyweights (1995)
  • A Kid in King Arthur's Court (1995)
  • George of the Jungle (1997)
  • Air Bud (1997)
  • RocketMan (1997)
  • Inspector Gadget (1999)
[–] Pandantic@midwest.social 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I feel like Sony Animation would knock this one outta the park.

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

Animation is now about as expensive as live-action, and Disney, like most studios, is still on "animation is for kids". They're trying to position these live-action remakes as somehow "more adult" because they're not animated.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 6 points 22 hours ago

The Rocketeer (1991)

As much as I love good animation, nothing can possibly replace 1991 Jennifer Connely.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 30 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Bedknobs and Broomsticks but the animated parts are live action…

Incidentally Bedknobs and Broomsticks is the better Mary Poppins, I know I know it’s an unpopular opinion but I stand by it.

Thats just because of how awesome Angela Lansbury is in everything she ever did.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Zoomboingding@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Honey I Shrunk the Kids would make a great animated movie, and Rick Morranis could reprise his role!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)

The hierarchy of power in the live-action remake universe is about to change.

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 45 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Good

Pray this is the end of this live action shit

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] skeezix@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago
[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago

Disney: Every one of our animated films requires a half-hearted live-action remake.

Everyone else: No.

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 40 points 1 day ago (13 children)

Really proves how simple-minded these people were. They were creating cashgrab nostalgia remakes in a manner that snubs royalties to original crews who worked on the original films, but they couldn't even tell remaking a modern film with no nostalgia value was a bad idea.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.cafe 15 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Let’s dump all the charm and character of the famously last major hand-drawn animation and cover it in slop.

Wait, why aren’t people fighting to give us their money?!?!

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›