Isn't this an ad from a country that has the most cameras on the street watching people and tracking their movements m
this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2026
442 points (98.9% liked)
Privacy
49894 readers
176 users here now
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don't promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
lol yeah, although not sure if UK or the US have more cameras at this point
The UK a density for sure, but total would be America
yeah that sounds about right
Yeah the massive amounts of land that have no towns or even houses in the western half of the USA throws the density curve pretty dramatically. Makes it seem like the USA isn't the surveillance state it really is, while making other smaller (land wise) surveillance states seem worse. With the density looking less problematic, it really lets the frog that is the American populace not notice the water getting closer to boiling.
load more comments
(1 replies)
I'd be surprised if the Flock plague didn't tip the scales in favor of the US
it's definitely a tight race here
It's China. By like a lot. Lmfao
"Let’s first look at the top 10 cities with the most CCTV cameras per 1000 inhabitants:
Taiyuan, China – 119.6
Wuxi – China – 92.1
London, United Kingdom – 67.5
Changsha, China – 56.8
Beijing, China – 56.2
Hangzhou, China – 52.3
Kunming, China – 45.0
Qingdao, China – 44.5
Xiamen, China – 40.3
Harbin, China – 39.1
Now, let’s look at the top 10 cities by CCTV density per square km:
Chennai, India – 657
Hyderabad, India – 480
Harbin, China – 411
London, United Kingdom – 399
Xiamen, China – 385
Chengdu, China – 350
Taiyuan, China – 319
Delhi, India – 289
Kunming, China – 281
Beijing, China – 278"
Sorry what are we talking about? Aren't you the guy who like two comments below this agrees it's probably the UK by a per citizen margin?
load more comments
(8 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
Uhhhh pretty sure China holds that title by a long shot my dude
In absolute numbers probably but due to size and population China tops most lists of absolute numbers so it's not really an informative metric. In terms of per capita I'm 90% sure the US leads China in CCTV cameras.
No China just laps entirely. To have such a large population and also dominate the statistic of cameras per 1000 citizens mean they have millions of more cameras.
Have proof for that because I have articles that state the US is ahead per capita and you seem to just be saying things?
load more comments
(2 replies)
People are going to react to this with a knee-jerk "nuh uh!" because you're being a smug reddituer about it, but I'm going to take a different approach. China actually invests in its infrastructure so obviously it's going to have more and newer cameras, simply because it's actually building and expanding. In China you might be surveilled in one of the more than 1000 high speed rail stations. In the UK it might be in one of four, or more likely a low speed train station. In the US it might be a bus station.
That's the difference. When countries are growing and building, they're installing cameras. Every country is going to install more and more cameras forever, the only countries that won't are the ones that are in decline. China is growing and building faster than anyone, so they're going to have more cameras. This needs to be taken into account.
Kylie Jenner ads at bus stops for google glass are some sci fi dystopia shit on their own. They Live was exactly about this.
load more comments
(4 replies)
It's still boggles my mind that the foundation of the Kardashian/Jenner business empire is a (probably intentionally) leaked sex tape.
Same here. Such a weird level of social "power" given to them without actual reason. At least the old capitalist families actually had functionally important capital control with oil, land, industrial production. The Kardashian/Jenner families are just famous and rich for being famous and rich. And they (and many others like them) have inspired so many people to aspire to get famous and rich via clout chasing instead of anything else. Becoming a plague of thinking they are smart about stuff just because of their follower count.
it tells you where humanity is at rn.
Yeah for sure.
Wait fr? That's crazy
I never understood why they were popular at all
"They Live" will remain relevant until capitalism is dead and buried.
I love they live
Only the first 30 minutes. The rest basically is capitalism
load more comments
(1 replies)
I, thought, the monsters in They Live were aliens, but I think they’re a metaphor for the parasitic wealth class.
/c/subvertising
man i know some people with schizophrenia that would lose it after seeing that
load more comments
(1 replies)
ABAB
Busses? Bitches?
All busses are bitches.
🅱️ops?
Assigned baby at birth
load more comments
(2 replies)
Anyone remember 'culture jamming'?
is that when bacteria researchers play Bob Marley tracks in the lab
We jammin' in the name of pee-tree
load more comments
(1 replies)
I don't really know how popular that movie is with people who aren't into subvertising... I don't think it's very popular, I don't know if people will get the reference.
The message is clear without knowing the reference though
view more: next ›