this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2026
518 points (97.1% liked)

memes

22177 readers
2391 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mrfriki@lemmy.world 87 points 3 days ago (4 children)
[–] Strider@lemmy.world 24 points 3 days ago

Yup, they actually get people to do that. Not me either but here we are.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago

I have a few friends that proudly say they pay for premium...

I love them, but I do think less of them when they say this.

[–] inari@piefed.zip 11 points 3 days ago

What's an ad?

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 days ago

Only on the webpage... without adblocker... so basically no protection.

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 53 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I don't pay and don't get ads either. Stop being a sucker. Yes, I am fine with them going bankrupt if everyone would do that.

[–] FreddiesLantern@leminal.space 27 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Fine with it? I'm waiting for it!

[–] DaedalousIlios@pawb.social 3 points 3 days ago

Agreed! I'll take it a step further that they need to face bankruptcy over this!

The problem is that even if everyone paid for YouTube's subscription, they'd raise the price, slash the features, and reintroduce ads unless you pay for an even more expensive tier. Just like Netflix.

Why? Because advertising companies will always be giving more money to YouTube than the users. The only thing paying YouTube gets you is the Sunk Cost fallacy.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] schwifty_squanch@lemmy.ml 34 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Next up, you pay a subscription AND you watch ads!

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 24 points 3 days ago

Amazon: "hey, stop copying me!"

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

What, like cable television?

[–] green_link@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

TV over the air had ads to pay for the TV shows and channels you watched because they couldn't really secure the signal they sent out. but also it wasn't really supposed to be secure in the first place. but TV production was expensive. so you got commercials, ads and sponsors when you watched.

then cable TV came about. cable TV was supposed to be ad free because you were paying. but then they would have had to fill in for segments when over the air TV was showing ads so instead of that they just showed the same ads and got paid for it. that's double dipping.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 days ago

This is already happening with imbedded ads from content creators.

[–] jqubed@lemmy.world 36 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] lazynooblet@lazysoci.al 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I hate my government for forcing Imgur to be blocked :(

[–] arsCynic@piefed.social 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Meanwhile we can't pay for uBlock Origin because he won't let us: https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/Why-don't-you-accept-donations%3F.

[–] LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I mean

How do you expect Youtube to make money

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] green_link@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

not defending youtube or ads in general, but technically the ad companies don't pay unless the ad is viewed/served, or only pay depending on how much of the ad is viewed. they aren't double dipping like this is implying.

youtube is only getting paid if an ad is shown, and depending on the duration of the ad only for the duration of the ad that is shown to the end user. for like s skippable ad, for the first 30 seconds you can't skip they get paid for that 30 seconds, but if ithe ad is longer say a minute, but the skip button appears after 30 and you press the skip button youtube only gets paid for the 30seconds the ad was displayed. if you don't skip then they get paid for the amount of time the ad was shown.

if you pay for youtube premium, then they don't show ads, they don't get paid for ads not shown. but that's why you are giving them money. to compensate for the "lost revenue" they aren't getting from ads.

and for things like adblockers, the ads are not served therefore don't qualify for being billed and youtube doesn't get paid. and youtube pays channels based on performance of ads being displayed, and that's why a lot of channels have both ad spots and sponsor segments. that and youtube doesn't pay real good for ad revenue unless you are a huge channel.

and then sponsor block skips sponsor sections for you and some sponsors/channels don't care the contract was do a sponsor segment and those contracts are outside of youtube itself so youtube doesn't get paid for them, that's why there isn't a sponsor skip action when you pay for premium. but i fear sponsors will corrupt and start doing contracts where they track how many times a segment was viewed and pay out based on that metric too.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gh0stcassette@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 3 days ago (3 children)

No tf we don't. YouTube ReVanced, YouTube Morphe, uBlock Origin

[–] 666dollarfootlong@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

And sponsorblock.

[–] laurenceOfSuburbia@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (3 children)

For some reason either morphe and revanced are stuttering for me recently

[–] 666dollarfootlong@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Same for me, revanced takes what feels like an entire minute or more before starting playback. And quality settings are not available. Is there a revanced community here on Lemmy?

[–] Itsamelemmy@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Pretty sure revanced has been abandoned. Morphe works perfectly fine, though I've had at least one instance since using it, that it stopped functioning, but just required an update. Using morphe for both youtube and youtube music.

[–] 666dollarfootlong@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Oh okay. Which is the official legit website for morphe?

[–] Itsamelemmy@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago

https://github.com/MorpheApp

Or https://morphe.software/ for the apk, which is also linked in the github.

load more comments (3 replies)

Force close the app and clear the cache, that fixes it for me.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] selarian@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Smart tube on my older Sony android tv

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

We pay YouTube not to shows ads, then youtubers imbed ads in videos. So we pay to watch ads.

[–] AndyMFK@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 3 days ago

Sponsorblock my friend. It'll automatically skip embedded ads. https://sponsor.ajay.app/

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

Nope. My adblocker is free.

[–] borQue@lemmy.zip 14 points 3 days ago

Typical American company.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

why pay ads when you can just block them? doesnt make sen to pay 10+$ for it, also i heard they want to increase the price and add in ads in the lower subscriptions anyways.

Because content isn't free to produce? Because I want to support creators and can't be half assed to donate to every individual random patron?

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Also: "and this is who is sponsoring me to show my shit on YouTube"

My fave is when there's an ad break during an ad.

[–] huppakee@lemmy.world 17 points 4 days ago (5 children)

Not to be that guy, but it's actually Companies pay the running cost of YouTube (plus a little bit of pocket money for the creators whose videos you watch) so you can watch free of charge, in exchange for this they get to show you a video. I don't like Google either and rob them of their income by using an adblocker. Though if nobody pays and nobody watches ads they might find even worse ways to pay the bills.

[–] Vespair@lemmy.zip 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Google wants to get paid thrice for YouTube. That's not okay.

I'll consider allowing ads when they stop harvesting and selling data - until then, that data is my payment.

They don't get to show ads, sell our data, and charge a subscription. I'm tired of paying twice for shit.

[–] huppakee@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah Google sucks, didn't want to defend them but the business model in general. Companies should not be allowed to sell data. Them collecting your data as part of their ad business is one thing, but selling it shouldn't be allowed imo.

[–] Vespair@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 days ago

This. If you want to collect analytics for in house decision making, merchandising, whatever, I say go for. But as soon as you start selling that data or the conclusions thereof, it becomes a currency, and if I'm paying that currency you better not be asking me for another.

[–] mushroommunk@lemmy.today 15 points 4 days ago (2 children)

The meme is talking about YouTube Premium who's main selling point is ad-free viewing

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

Well, yeah. Companies pay youtube to show you ads on their platform; this lets youtube stay free for users while still being an unbelievably expensive operation (not debating the ethics just - that's how the funding works). As an alternative, youtube gives you the option of paying them directly to buy the space ads would normally have bid on, and then blank it out. They get a steady monthly revenue stream, even if it's less than they'd be making by selling that ad space, and you get no ads.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 7 points 4 days ago

I rather pay for good entertainment than watch ads for bad entertainment.

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

What like... Charge influencers to upload their shit videos? Oh sweet baby Jesus, that would be amazing!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] osanna@lemmy.vg 3 points 2 days ago

while ALSO mining all your data.

[–] scytale@piefed.zip 6 points 3 days ago
[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Every day brings us closer to AD BS.

load more comments
view more: next ›