this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2026
345 points (96.2% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

46979 readers
1137 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that. Please post actually infuriating posts to !actually_infuriating@lemmy.world

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating. If your post better fits !Actually_Infuriating put it there.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, but attribution is not required in any way. No links to Reddit in post body


-If you would like to provide a source link, do so in the comments but not in the post body.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Gallery image 2

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Generica@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I'm Gen-X and we usually get dumped in with the Boomers here in the US. However, ours was the first generation to get fucked. Like all those golden pensions of yesteryear dried up and disappeared as soon as we began entering the job force. So those a little older than us are kickin' back enjoying 70% of their retirement pay or whatever, often with health insurance (as opposed to Medicare), and we're stuck with shitty 401Ks that yield not only less assets but less secured assets because you can easily go through your entire benefits before you die, as opposed to the pension system. And, of course, our retirement today doesn't typically come with any auxiliary benefits such as healthcare. Plus most of us are assisting our elderly surviving parents and adult children simultaneously!

[–] lazylion_ca@lemmy.ca 8 points 20 hours ago

At least add pregnant women so you're not a complete dick.

But honestly, fuck this noise.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago

What if they're a homeless boomer? An unmovable object means an irresistible force.

[–] BillCheddar@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

The point is to create a rule that they can selectively enforce.

[–] CanIFishHere@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is so ridiculous I hope it's fake.

[–] TransNeko@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

It's America... I'm sure it's not only real but enforceable with jail time.

The anti-property tax propaganda is from the real estate hoarding corporate owners. As usual, these anti-tax wingnuts latch on to “why should I pay property tax (insert selfish reason here)” when the real reason is the real estate hoarding companies don’t want to pay property taxes on all the properties they’ve hoarded and are likely sitting empty. The same properties they used to price people out of homebuying, the same ones they used to increase rent super high because you can’t afford a home and will own nothing.

And of course anti-tax wingnuts don’t care that property taxes pay for schools, police, fire services,etc. (ain’t got no kids so why should I pay for school? My house has never burned down. Who needs cops when I got a Smith and Wesson?) and those things will still have to be paid for via some kind of tax, so in the end they still pay but the absentee owners get a huge tax break.

[–] svdasein@lemmy.world 83 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I think we may have bigger fish to fry these days; billionaires love it when little people fight amongst themselves. It's high comedy because in the mean time they're well on their way to owning everything.

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 54 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I disagree wholeheartedly. This is a dumb exclusionary policy being fairly pointed out, not ageism.

I'll explain it with a comparision of the language used.

The language used for benches like this in my country, Australia: "Priority seating. Please stand for seniors and handicapped people".

Priority, based on needs. Anyone can use it otherwise.

The language used in this sign: "Benches are for seniors are handicapped citizens only"

Exclusionary, based on privilege and needs. If you are old and infirm and a citizen ONLY YOU may ever use this bench, and if you're not a citizen (tourist, asylum seeker, migrant worker) you can fuck off regardless of your needs.

This is not a subtle distinction. This is language used to assert a hierarchy and exclude underclasses, and it's embedded into every aspect of your society without most people even noticing because they've never seen different.

[–] svdasein@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

I don't disagree with you. My point is simply that in the US right now there's a concerted effort to keep the citizenry in a frenzy of angry finger pointing to distract us from the fact that we are being robbed blind by the "Epstein class". The issues are real, but these are relatively small issues in comparison. Those folks pay actual money to keep us doing this shit and it works. In the US we have a desperate need to understand that this is engineered, and the engineers are laughing their asses off at the screaming rabble.

[–] guillem@aussie.zone 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Pitting racism doesn't work so well with left-leaning audiences, so the billionaires try with ageism which is not so frowned upon. No demographic is without a wedge to exploit.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 4 points 1 day ago

Also against homeless people, which everyone, even poor people with some sort of housing looks down upon.

[–] Zirconium@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Went canvassing for the first time today. So many seniors living in shitty homes. Fixed income at $900 and rent is still going up while no jobs exist for miles. We cant single out a generation and just blame them while material conditions worsen everywhere.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago

is that rural, lcol areas. we still have 1 story homes in our pretty expensive col area.

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You're not wrong... But the crossover age range of the vast majority of billionaires and seniors is a damned circle, it's both a class and age thing simultaneously. Boomers are usually defined as those born between 1946 and 1964, so that age range would be 62-80 as of 2026.

Nearly half of the 3,323 billionaires worldwide in 2023 were between 50 and 70 years old. Moreover, more than 40 percent were above 70 years, whereas around 10 percent were below 50 years.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/621046/age-distribution-of-billionaires-globally/

And that ignores the much larger number of them that are under a billion but still well on their way up towards it. In practicality, there's little difference between 100 million and a billion despite it being 90% less.

[–] guillem@aussie.zone 4 points 1 day ago

Of those mentioned between 50 and 70 years old, the ones up to 61 are Gen X.

Also the trillionaire is Gen X.

I have seen so many boomers going to the front of demonstrations to make the police hold back their batons.

It's not a generational issue, it's a media bombardment of manufactured issues with a generational spin. In that picture we should be angry at not having enough benches for everybody instead of blaming the beneficiaries of that dumb sign.

[–] obvs@lemmy.world 39 points 1 day ago

You can tell that you live in a society that's about to totally collapse when you see signs like this.

[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 day ago

Looks like a private sign posted on private property. Can be ignored.

[–] trem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Surely, that sign is more expensive than any sort of additional maintenance cost from people using your bench...?

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I doubt this is about bench maintenance and more about giving and excuse to chase homeless people and kids away from the area. In other places they just use bench designs that are uncomfortable or make it impossible to lay down.

[–] poweruser 2 points 18 hours ago

It also mentions citizens so presumably they can chase away anyone who doesn't look like a citizen

[–] trem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago

Ah, well that's just fucking lovely. So, presumably they're legally required to put a bench there, but they would also rather not have anyone actually exist there...

[–] tired_n_bored@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In my town benches are the recreational place for teenagers. What are teens/young people supposed to do?

[–] mrlemmyhimself@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

Spend their parents money or get fucked

[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Or what? You get a ticket if you're not old enough? If you have a problem with not enough benches for everyone, maybe just make more benches? Not like they are expensive.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

$1500 plus installation and ongoing cleaning and maintenance, plus each one probably adds to insurance.

Better use of tax revenue than hiring another cop, though. In fact they could afford more benches if they fired a cop, that would be a good trade.

Whenever a city says they don't have the money, suggest they fire a cop.

[–] StumblingWasabi@lemmy.today 6 points 1 day ago

Or suggest they don't spend money they don't have on flock mass surveillance cameras

[–] Kissaki@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago

"Oh, sorry, I didn't see the notice. Maybe it should be more obvious."

[–] TIEPilot@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Whats the age are you considered a "senior"? I got the handicap part already, so thats nice...

(it actually sucks, but I make the best of it)

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] 11111one11111@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Jokes on you. Fewshman year of highschool was the best 6 years of my life.

[–] TIEPilot@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah yeah yeah you're technically correct :)

[–] MML@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Not true! I was still a sophomore!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Kissaki@feddit.org 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

If my job role is senior that counts, right?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mrmisses@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I think it's 55

Edit: my info was based off of discounts so I was half right

Age 55 is generally not considered an official senior citizen by the government, though it marks the start of early senior status for housing, marketing, and select discounts.

[–] TIEPilot@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Dang almost there... Where do the years go eh?

[–] mrmisses@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not far behind you. It's all just been wasted fucking around, for me.

Youth is wasted on the young.

[–] TIEPilot@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Right? If I knew what I know now or had listen to the old guys I would be a millionaire... But nope, I knew better than any of them... Man I was a dumb kid.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

What about the younger handicap's? Are they all screwed because of those stinking Boomers? One day in the distant future we'll need to do something about those Boomers. /s

[–] tazeycrazy@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago

Kids don't play outside anymore. Also Why are there kids outside!!!

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Where I live they also have housing exclusive to 55+ so it's much cheaper since there's a smaller market for them.

Ruins the housing economy and then holds some that's only available for themselves for cheap while they downsize for a massive nestegg.

[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Is it a problem that the 55+ housing lowers prices of other housing in the area, or that seniors are selling their old homes and actually keeping the money from the sale?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It is generally cheaper where I live because towns have to build affordable housing and it is considered more acceptable to have poor elderly people than poor people with children.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Some of Gen X is elderly now, too.

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I'm disabled, but I'll gleefully cut the sign down and piss all over it in broad daylight. Anybody tries to stop me and it becomes a piss-coated harpoon. Every day if necessary, until they get the message.

That level of petty bullshit goes right back where it came from. I'm not at all opposed of going lower than my opponent - wtf are they going to do, try to get public and legal support for harassing a disabled person? Lmao

load more comments
view more: next ›