235
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by someguy3@lemmy.ca to c/asklemmy@lemmy.world

I'm talking about a massive park in the absolute heart of the city. Located such that is naturally surrounded by city high rises. *People are giving examples of parks that are way off in the boonies. I'm trying to say located centrally, heart of the city, you know where the high rises are. Yes I understand nyc has more, the point is centrally located.

Copied by younger cities in North Americ. You know, the cities younger than NYC that could have seen the value of setting aside a large area for parkland before it was developed.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Hawke@lemmy.world 243 points 1 year ago

Because other cities didn’t have a large black neighborhood to knock down.

[-] Grayox@lemmy.ml 77 points 1 year ago

They used all those up for the Interstate system.

[-] Hawke@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

Yup, About 100 years later. What’s old is new again.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] tdot@lemmy.world 56 points 1 year ago

This is yet another absolutely shameful example of government led evil, but Seneca Village was also a small portion of what makes up Central Park. We need not imply that demolishing a thriving black community was the sole goal of Central Park to acknowledge how fundamentally fucked up this place is.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] malloc@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

The large black neighborhoods were replaced by highways before cities could replace them with Central Park-esque projects

[-] Travalanche@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Well, that's simply not true. While that may be how they found the land for Central Park, that's not the reason why other cities haven't made large parks like in NYC.
Portland, OR has (I think) the second biggest inner-city park in the country, and I'm fairly sure no minority neighborhoods were destroyed to create it. Way to be edgy though.
As for answering OP's question... I'm guessing the property is just too valuable as commercial and residential land for the city governments to want to redesignate as parks. Especially now with the housing crisis and all.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

In fairness, they did try to obtain property that also had two wealthy families on twice (with injunctions that failed) before looking at the Central Park area that Seneca Village was also in.

Of course that doesn’t sound as much as a hot take that you gave.

[-] fubo@lemmy.world 68 points 1 year ago

It was! San Francisco's Golden Gate Park (4.1 km²) is in fact larger than NYC's Central Park (3.4km²).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_Gate_Park

[-] Cubes@lemm.ee 23 points 1 year ago

St. Louis's Forest Park is bigger still at 5.3 km^2

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

So is Prospect Park in Brooklyn

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] halferect@lemmy.world 58 points 1 year ago

They didn't set it aside, they displaced people to make a park.

[-] KinglyWeevil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 year ago

I'm honestly surprised that they haven't followed up by just allowing the city to gradually eat the park.

[-] MargotRobbie@lemmy.world 51 points 1 year ago

Central Park is cool and all, but most cities could do with a large quantity of much smaller parks that people can walk to instead of one really big park in the middle of downtown.

We are here for decentralization after all.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago

I want both.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago

Well, most of them had no thriving black community in the middle of the town that they could raze to create a park.

[-] nucawysi@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago

"naturally surounded by high rises" nothing natural about that. Its callled urban planning and in this case complete control was given to one guy, the one that made prospect park too, i saw a docu on it. Sometimes it works out, sometimes it doesn't but the bearucracy and corruption with funding usually takes its place. A lot of cities simply weren't planned for that, central park is designed pre-automobile. Many new cities are post-auto, so they dont care about walking spaces like they used to, a lot of cities have decided that the public is dangerous and hard to control, they dont want them to gather or loiter in any space and why should they give something for free when a business can profit from their need? NYC came from a place where they the populace was accustomed to dealing with the public in person on a daily basis.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ladicius@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago

Most cities in Germany have parks in or near the city centre. In fact it's considered unusual if there's isn't any.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] hanekam@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago

London has Hyde and Regent's Parks. Paris has the Bois de Boulogne, Berlni has the great Tiergarten. Big parks are a common feature of cities.

[-] SomeoneElse@lemmy.ca 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

London has far far far more parks than those two! They’re not even the biggest in London, Richmond park is at 2500 acres (that’s more than 3x the size of Central Park) It’s where that viral video of the dog chasing deer was taken - JESUS CHRIST, FENTON!! Personally I’ve always preferred St James Park over Hyde or regents if you’re in central London, but it’s a small 50ish acres. Hampstead Heath (800 acres) and bushy park (1099 acres) are similar in size to Central Park too if you’d prefer not to be in central London.

To answer OPs question, I’d much rather live in a city with more parks than I can count than just one massive one somewhere. There’s 5 parks within a 15 minute walk of my house and I live in a city!

EDIT: from Wikipedia: London is made of 40% public green space, including 3,000 parks and totaling 35,000 acres.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BnjmnBanks@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago

Central Park was once a whole community thriving community. They forced them out (eminent domain) and turned it into the Central Park we know now. Other cities have huge parks and areas, but New York markets their state like no other (maybe California).

[-] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

naturally surrounded by city high rises.

Something seems odd with the idea that high rises were 'natural' :-)

For me, the "concept" is terribly wrong.

A park itself is fine, but you can't use one park as an excuse for not having other parks, green areas etc. anymore in a big city.

New York has 5 times more people than Munich. But Munich's biggest park is about the same size as New York's Central Park (a little bigger even). And if you count all the green areas, parks etc. in Munich together, they are 6 times larger (counting only the ones that are publicly accessible and listed in wikipedia) than that Central Park.

So, give your New Yorker's 30 central parks and lots of other green spots, and you got a concept.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] derf82@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

NYC’s Central Park has 843 acres

Cleveland’s Emerald Necklace has 7 parks with over 1,500 acres. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleveland_Metroparks

And that doesn’t even count a 32,000 acre national park just south of greater Cleveland.

New York is just a more famous large city. Plenty of other cities have vast parks.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] hperrin@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

Yeah, how come no other cities have parks?

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

because no one values green spaces.

Which is why government typically rubberstamps every developer request to clearcut new forests and turn under new grassland, to build a new poorly built development of McMansions that will probably have to be extensively rebuilt within 5-10 years due to the apalling build quality.

Same reason no one builds affordable homes. Why develop homes for the poors, for 100k, when they can make McMansions on the same land, and sell them for 1mil+ a pop.

If Central Park was proposed today, it would be decried as a waste of valuable property (and probably liberal wokeism)

[-] nucawysi@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

a lot of central park was for rich people actually or designed with rich citizens to use it in mind

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

Boston spent billions of dollars to replace their downtown freeways with green space.

[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

They spent billions to fix traffic issues and failing infrastructure.

The greenspace was a byproduct. That was only allowed to happen because buildings along the former elevated roadway would see a massive increase in land value with the roadway gone that was more valuable than shoving more buildings into the strip of land.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] HerrLewakaas@feddit.de 17 points 1 year ago

Happy Munich noises. Bigger than central park too 😉

[-] techognito@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

TIL I have more reasons to visit Munich than to visit NYC

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] derf82@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

People are giving examples of parks that are way off in the boonies.

First, things are not so binary that it’s either high rises and boonies.

Second, NYC has a huge central business district. My own city does not have enough high rises to surround a large park. Such a park would destroy most midsize cities, not enhance them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Lauchs@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Vancouver has Stanley park which is bigger than Central Park, right next to downtown and on the water. (So we have a nice seawall around it you can run/bike along.)

The answer to the question though is these giant parks are incredibly expensive. Think how many billions of dollars in apartmentsyou could replace that park with. I don't think it'd be a good trade but for cities which are chronically strapped for cash, that's a hard bargain.

[-] KinNectar@kbin.run 13 points 1 year ago

@someguy3 Portland, Oregon has the largest urban park in the country, Forest Park, but it is forested an not a garden park. Also it is on the edge of the city instead of Central.

[-] JungleJim@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago

Jacksonville Florida doesn't have a large central park, but with 86 acres of park per 1000 residents and one of the largest geographical areas of any single city in the US, that's a lot of parks. I suppose I'm trying to say there are other ways a city can embrace park culture without a central park style hub park.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

I think most U.S. cities that were established before cars have large, centrally located urban parks. New Orleans, Boston, San Francisco, Detroit, etc. The cities that don’t are probably ones that grew only after cars were ubiquitous so the park could be wherever.

Like a western city in a mountain valley that had a population boom after cars would probably prefer their main urban park to be on the periphery for hiking trails and access to the mountain. The green-space didn’t have to be on a trolley line near downtown to be accessible.

[-] DancingIsForbidden@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

As a New Yorker, let me just assure you that it wasn’t really designed with crosstown traffic in mind. If you’re going from West 69th and say, 10th Ave, to East 69th and 2nd, you’re in for a shitshow no matter what you do. This includes walking (try not to be ran over by an Uber walking through Central Park late at night). Taking the subway(what subway line goes from upper east to upper west?? Hahahah you’re fucked!) Or taking a crosstown bus (Takes almost an hour to go from 10th avenue to 2nd avenue cause you’re gonna have to go all the way up/down to the cross park street).

Multiple smaller parks would probably be much better, or just, y’know, having space for trees outside of the designated tree infrastructure.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

I live in Chicago and we do have a big centrally located park, along with other smaller parks scattered around. It's down by the lake, and they keep that big stupid bean there.

Pro tip for tourists, if you absolutely have to go see the bean don't touch it; everybody touches the damn thing and you will get sick. Go look at the Picasso instead. It's on all of the tourist attraction maps and way more interesting than a big shiny bean.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] AquaTofana@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Baltimore, Maryland has a gigantic green space (second biggest woodland park in the United States according to Wikipedia) right in the center of the city called Leakin Park. It's gorgeous during the day time, but unfortunately during the evening most people avoid it because it's become a dumping ground for bodies.

It's become known in the region as one of the most dangerous parks in the United States, which super sucks.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] junker101 8 points 1 year ago

San Diego has a bigger one. Go check it out.

There are central parks in Boston and San Francisco…

[-] residentmarchant@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

I got interested in the thought and looked it up. Boston Common predates Central Park by about 200 years!

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Blamemeta@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

They do, they're just not as large as central park, not as iconic, and they're more misshapen.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] littlecolt@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

Check out Forest Park in St. Louis. It's nice.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CodexArcanum@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

City Park here in NOLA is 1300 acres (50% larger than Central Park) and was established in 1854, making it three years older as well. Stay losing NYC! 😜

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2023
235 points (90.1% liked)

Ask Lemmy

27231 readers
3195 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS