210
Is an Extreme Republican Shutdown different than the usual government shutdown?
There are other conceivable sorts of disagreements that might cause a shut down, some much more reasonable. I think it’s fair to call this particular shutdown out for being the result of extremist elements in the Republican Party making absurd demands.
It’s so extreme that even most Republicans outside of the freedom caucus don’t seem to want a shutdown, to the point where the last speaker sacrificed his career to try to avoid one.
It’s so extreme that even most Republicans outside of the freedom caucus don’t seem to want a shutdown, to the point where the last speaker sacrificed his career to try to avoid one.
this is why we're fucked.
God forbid they compromise with dems, rather than let 8 people stop everything.
Yeah agreed. One scary thing is that, even if some Republicans wanted to compromise, the political incentives are fucked. People get primaried out of their seat for much less than actively supporting the opposing party against one's own. The two party system is completely broken.
Not a fault of the 2 party system. Democrats have no issues being the adults in the room. It's the Republican party that needs to be evaluated. False equivalency and all that.
They are losing elections like crazy, so I guess the system is working.
Most Americans, including Republicans, do not want a shutdown, but the democratic mechanisms aren't functioning. There is absolutely a systemic problem with the incentives of a two party system in the US, in conjunction with a primary system where the diehards are much more likely to vote. It rewards extremism.
That said, it is also true that the Republican party is by far worse than Democrats. In fact, one explains the other. I am not claiming the parties are equivalent, so it is just uncharitable to accuse me of false equivalency.
But it is really just 8 extreme republicans. 8 people shutting down everything. It's up to republicans in the house of representatives to boot these guys, even if it means siding with the dems. It's not partisanship. It's loyalty to 8 people.
It's sponsored by Red Bull.
Red Bull gives you right wiii-iiiings!
MOVE! THAT! ~~BUS~~ GOALPOST!
It's good messaging here by the White House.
But otherwise, no.
Let the population understand why so many children will be suffering through hunger, cold, and having no presents this holiday season - GOP incompetence.
It's sponsored by Red Bull.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
“This proposal is just a recipe for more Republican chaos and more shutdowns—full stop,” a statement from White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre read.
“An Extreme Republican Shutdown would put critical national security and domestic priorities at risk, including by forcing service members to work without pay,” Jean-Pierre continued.
“This two-step continuing resolution is a necessary bill to place House Republicans in the best position to fight for conservative victories,” Johnson posted to X, the platform formerly known as Twitter.
Sen. Johnson’s Democratic colleague, Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii), appeared to have a polar opposite reaction to the CR.
“There’s nothing inherently conservative about making simple things super convoluted, and all of this nonsense costs taxpayer money.”
Speaker Johnson’s fellow House Republican, Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) also stated his opposition to the CR.
The original article contains 463 words, the summary contains 132 words. Saved 71%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
"Extreme Republican Shutdown' is never going to stick. No news media is going to use that because it's so obviously partisan. The real trick is to get something that everyone calls it while still obviously framing it on your terms.
I'm thinking something like "The Congressional Chaos Shutdown" would sound fact based while still obviously pinning it on the Republican Comgress.
I disagree, “The Congressional Chaos Shutdown" would pin it on congress as a whole.
There’s a semi-paradoxical fact that most people strongly dislike congress, but have higher opinions of their congressman. They always blame dysfunction on “other people in congress”. I guarantee if you polled republican voters and asked who was in control of congress, a substantial portion would say democrats.
That's what they tried to do when McCarthy was ousted, blame it on the Democrats. The majority of those who voted to remove McCarthy, do it was the Democrats that did it. Ignoring of course the actual instigators, Republicans.
Exactly! Heck, right before he was ousted McCarthy went on TV and blamed Democrats for not passing a budget, despite the fact that 1) McCarthy’s continuing resolution passed primarily with Democrat votes, and 2) Republicans were the ones unable to agree as a party on a budget.
It’s super important to constantly hammer home that all of this dysfunction isn’t “congress”, it’s congressional republicans.
I like "MAGA mess".
I think they should just refer to the people themselves as "Republican Extremists" and leave it at that.
It doesn't make "moderate Republicans" feel bad, and allows them join in hating on the "bad ones" instead of going into full defensive mode. I use quotations because a lot of them like to pretend to be the smart ones sometimes.
It also forces them to mentally associate with other things they hate that are labeled ________ extremists.
Nah, we NEED to drive a wedge between the noncrazies and the crazies. If calling it the MAGA Mess gets the normies angry at the psychos, GOOD!
They're only making room for more and more harm the longer they retain ANY power. Influence is power. They have less influence if they fail to ally.
Why would the “Make America Gay Again” movement be held responsible?
When has obviously partisan news ever stopped anyone?
My point is that the news that try to be nonpartisan won't use the language. So, always, I guess?
It's super cringe to read...
Dems suck at messaging.
Dems suck at messaging because the entire media apparatus does republicans' work for them.
I fuckin' love how both liberals and conservatives are absolutely convinced that their side sucks at messaging and that the media companies are biased against them. 🤣
Who owns the company that’s writing scripts for local news?
Often, Sinclair.
this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2023
210 points (97.3% liked)
politics
18821 readers
4820 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS