629
submitted 8 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

The Florida law that limits drag shows in the state will remain blocked, the Supreme Court said Thursday, dealing a blow to a key initiative championed by Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis.

Florida had asked the high court to narrow a lower court’s injunction that stopped the law from being enforced statewide. The justices declined to do so.

Conservative Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch said they would have allowed the law to take effect.

all 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] dynamojoe@lemmy.world 206 points 8 months ago

Conservative Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch said they would have allowed the law to take effect.

Of course they did.

[-] JimmyBigSausage@lemm.ee 40 points 8 months ago

And, of course, this silly law was struck down.

[-] PlantDadManGuy@lemmy.world 69 points 8 months ago

By a concerningly narrow margin.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago

They will rewrite it and address the few procedural things the court went after.

[-] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 136 points 8 months ago

Just to be clear, this law wasn't passed with any expectation of it ever being implemented. Everyone, including the Florida legislature, knew it was unconstitutional and would be overturned. The people it was passed for will never even know it was overturned though. It was passed for DeSantis who wanted red meat for his base. You should be happy that DeSantis is a terrible politican because he is a terrible person and belongs nowhere near the Presidency.

[-] Changetheview@lemmy.world 48 points 8 months ago

Shit politician and terrible person. But he’s pretty good at rocking some killer high heels, which I’m interpreting as his way to show LGBT and drag community support.

https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2023/10/31/desantis-boots-shoemakers-00121044

[-] spider@lemmy.nz 24 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

What a waste of taxpayer dollars by so-called "conservatives".

[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 11 points 8 months ago

Conservative governments enacting laws that they know will fail court challenges, but that pander to their SoCon base has been happening increasingly over the last couple of decades.

And not only in the US.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 7 points 8 months ago

It's not a waste to them. They got what they wanted.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 64 points 8 months ago

When even Amy Coney Barrett thinks you're too much of a fascist...

[-] lingh0e@sh.itjust.works 15 points 8 months ago

She's a religious nut, but she seems to be a relatively intelligent religious nut with enough of an understanding of the constitution to know this shit doesn't pass muster.

Doesn't mean she won't uphold future bullshit laws that are less vague.

We live in the dumbest time-line.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 7 points 8 months ago

When a judge is willing to substitute their own opinions for the law, it doesn't matter how well they understand the law.

[-] stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 months ago

This has, however, been the case since the first time someone was a judge.

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago
[-] roboticide@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

Three of nine justices wanted to.

[-] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 30 points 8 months ago

This is as clear of a free speech issue as there is. Anyone bringing these cases should be laughed out of any court.

[-] Telodzrum@lemmy.world -2 points 8 months ago

It's really not. The majority specifically addressed this, too. The largest fault in the law was its unenforceable vagueness. While the Court did say there are First Amendment issues, the law itself and the instant case were not well-poised for direct analysis as 1A issues.

[-] xc2215x@lemmy.world 20 points 8 months ago

Glad the law cannot limit drag shows.

[-] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 18 points 8 months ago

What scares me is there's no repercussions for ignoring the court anymore.

[-] SheeEttin@lemmy.world 18 points 8 months ago

That's the secret. There never were any repercussions. All of civilization runs on the trust that people respect others.

[-] stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml 0 points 8 months ago

I like to say that "justice" is a fairy tail people tell their children to help them sleep at night.

[-] stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 months ago

There wasn't when the SCOTUS told Andrew Jackson to respect treaties signed with indigenous populations, and the Trail of Tears and tens of thousands of dead people were the result. In fact they impeached him over this and he bribed a senator to change their vote which put them one vote below the number required to convict. The sort of corruption you mention has been around since the country was founded.

[-] Wogi@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Andrew Jackson was not impeached.

Johnson was impeached for firing a member of his cabinet without senatorial approval.

[-] rayyy@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

Extreme Court is loosening up because most of the country has had just about enough of their shit.

[-] some_guy 1 points 8 months ago

I’m shocked that this court got one right.

this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2023
629 points (98.8% liked)

News

21850 readers
4883 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS