205
submitted 9 months ago by robocall@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 108 points 9 months ago

Company surprised that loss leading promotion lead to losses.

Details at 11.

[-] SheeEttin@lemmy.world 39 points 9 months ago

Yes, it's surprising when a loss leader leads to losses. For example, Olive Garden and their soup, salad, and bread sticks are probably loss leaders because of how cheap they are, but they make up that little loss with much better margins on entrees (and, I assume, drinks).

[-] _number8_@lemmy.world 33 points 9 months ago

i hate how the term 'loss leader' is bandied about like i'm meant to feel sorry for them so generously losing money on something when at the end of the night it's obviously one transaction for everything with a healthy amount of profits baked in

[-] zigmus64@lemmy.world 25 points 9 months ago

What else should it be called? I don’t think there’s some moral responsibility placed upon the patron to make up for the loss, even with that name. It’s a gamble for the business that is usually thought out and is intended to lead to an increase in profits overall due to margins baked into items that aren’t on promo.

Sure, it’s considered poor taste to come to a restaurant solely for the free bread and some water and then leave, but it’s completely fair game to take advantage of a loss leading promotion like “endless shrimp” or Costco’s $1.75 for a hot dog and soda. The loss leader gets you in the door. They have other strategies to make that loss worth their while. If you walk in and pound more shrimp than Red Lobster can cover with the margins on the rest of your ticket, that’s their fault not yours… the house lost that bet.

[-] Remmock@kbin.social 10 points 9 months ago

$1.50, and the CEO will kill you if you try to raise it.

[-] shasta@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

I heard they have monthly death matches in the garden section after midnight

[-] FutileRecipe@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago

like i'm meant to feel sorry for them so generously losing money on something

But think of the shareholders and CEO. Won't someone please think of the shareholders and CEO?!

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago

Soup might not actually be a loss leader. Their soups are pretty cheap to make in bulk- especially if they’re using left over ingredients that are not quite as fresh.

[-] roguetrick@kbin.social 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I'm sure they're fresh, darden(who used to own red lobster) likely doesn't get too granular with it's produce suppliers in the area. They'll make one contract for all their subsidiary restaurants I'm sure.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I doubt red lobster seafood is fresh (lobster are from the tank, the rest not so much). It’s frozen. (They’d have to fly it in special, for most of their locations. Which. Is not cheap.)

Their soups… I dunno 50/50 on them being warmed out of giant bags made in some distribution hub.

Their biscuits are made from a dry mix (probably identical to bisquick)

I was speaking to OG’s soups (which are made fresh- during prep that morning.) are pretty freaking cheap to make- especially since they probably use all the not-quite as fresh ingredients left over from the previous night; and stocks made from bits and pieces that would otherwise be tossed (like chicken carcass or skins/peels from carrots and onions).

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Their biscuits are made from a dry mix (probably identical to bisquick)

Where an I obtain massive quantities of this dry mix?

Asking for a friend.

[-] doubletwist@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

They sell it at grocery stores. They even have a gluten free version that my wife actually prefers to the regular.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TwentySeven@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Are we talking Bisquick or delicious Red Lobster Cheddar Biscuits here? Because there's a difference.

[-] feminalpanda@lemmings.world 2 points 9 months ago
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Pack of 12? What do you think I am, an anorexic?

[-] Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca 3 points 9 months ago

That's 12 boxes of mix, which each make 10 biscuits. That's over 3 kilograms of biscuit mix, which makes 120 biscuits, like 10 kilos of biscuits!

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

I stand by my previous statement.

[-] feminalpanda@lemmings.world 2 points 9 months ago

Subscribe to weekly delivery lol

[-] roguetrick@kbin.social 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

That's what I was taking about. I was taking about darden getting fresh produce. They're who own olive garden. They just also used to own red lobster but got rid of it.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

There’s levels of freshness, so to speak.

Soups usually get things that are not-as-fresh because they get simmered all day anyway- no one is gonna notice if the the carrots were getting flacid or if the protein is dried out from being cooked and not served.

They make the soup fresh daily- just in the morning. and they keep it hot so as to get it out quickly. The ingredients they use, though “fresh” are not the freshest in their pantry, if that makes sense. It’s the left over trimmings that get chopped up so as to hide it (this is actually a good thing. It reduces waste.)

[-] SheeEttin@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Yeah, loss leader probably isn't the right term for those.

[-] MummifiedClient5000@feddit.dk 56 points 9 months ago

That was unrealistic from the start. If the shrimp was truly unlimited it would lead to the eventual collapse of the universe.

[-] DarkGamer@kbin.social 19 points 9 months ago

One singularity of shrimp, please

[-] nomecks@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Perhaps the dimension without shrimp is actually this one. Really makes you think.

[-] MummifiedClient5000@feddit.dk 2 points 9 months ago

Dude...

Maybe the shrimp is us.

[-] SouthFresh@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 months ago

Shrimpulatiry or Singulariprawn?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 42 points 9 months ago

Red Lobster executives:

"No one could possibly eat that much shrimp."

Later...

"I'm sorry, sir. You've eaten every shrimp at every Red Lobster in the entire state and it's only been six hours. We don't have any more shrimp for you. That will be $20."

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago

Did a thing like that in my 20s. Got stoned with my best friend and gf, hit the local seafood joint.

Coming back to the table with my 5th plate of shrimp and my friend heard a man tell his wife, "Well it is all you can eat. He can do that if he wants."

One week later and they were out of business.

[-] misterundercoat@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago

Does this look like a man who's had all he could eat?

[-] Gork@lemm.ee 33 points 9 months ago

Unlimited shrimp is a misnomer as matter is finite. Even if all matter were converted to shrimp, it still wouldn't be truly unlimited.

Yay for needless pedantry.

[-] nickhammes@lemmy.world 20 points 9 months ago

The infinitely dense Red Lobster will always allow you to visit, but its event horizon won't let you leave

[-] misterundercoat@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I disagree with your conjecture.

Indeed, matter is finite. However, you are making the assumption that eating shrimp destroys the matter. In fact, eating the shrimp simply returns the matter to the ecosystem, where it will eventually contribute to more shrimp.

Unless you can prove the eventual heat death of the universe, which Red Lobster™ is prepared to fight in court.

Signed, Red Lobster Legal Division

P.S.: If you even think about trying to make Cheddar Bay Biscuits™ using one of those online recipes, we will pursue legal action. We make Nintendo look like Linus Torvalds.

[-] nous@programming.dev 4 points 9 months ago

If we are being pedantic, the article mentions it promotion as all you can eat rather then unlimited, except in the title and one place in the article. So the big question is what was it marketted as and is it just the author using the terms as synonyms?

There is a big difference between these if you are being pedantic and not really fair to blame the restaurant for the article authors choose of words.

But being realistic I would think it is fair to say unlimited and all you can eat are basically synonyms when it comes to restaurant promotions. And fair limitations should apply - like the restaurant running out of stock (assuming they a reasonable amount to begin with).

[-] jayrhacker@kbin.social 2 points 9 months ago

As long as I keep clicking, the machine keeps making paper clips, line go up…

[-] dan1101@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago

They will just have to start converting energy to matter, otherwise it's false advertising and I'll sue!

[-] Pregnenolone@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Only death is unlimited

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 29 points 9 months ago

Oh not again!

2003’s “Endless Crab” wiped out 1 president and $400 million in shareholder value… you’d‘ve thought they’d’ve learn’ed’ve.

[-] radix@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago

The next executive will convince somebody it's just a matter of time until they hit on the correct endless shellfish, then resign in disgrace after the endless clam promotion costs too much.

[-] jayrhacker@kbin.social 9 points 9 months ago

After clawing her way to the top at Red Lobster, Edna Morris is out as the chain’s president for letting hungry customers eat too much of its all-you-can-eat crab dinners.

clawing her way to the top: such amazing journalism

[-] roguetrick@kbin.social 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

That's back when they were owned by Darden, who decided to spin them off because seafood prices were too volatile.

Edit: what's funny about this is Darden was a restaurant group that mostly didn't focus on seafood, so red lobster wasn't a good fit. This company, Thai Union group, is a seafood packaging group (chicken of the sea, King Oscar), which also puts into question how well they're able to supply fresh fish. I don't think red lobster will ever be consistently profitable for these corporate chains.

[-] hungprocess 27 points 9 months ago
[-] PatFussy@lemm.ee 10 points 9 months ago
[-] Murvel@lemm.ee 5 points 9 months ago

Please, don't take the steam tray! Sir!

[-] _number8_@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago

yeah god fucking forbid anything be good and actually valuable for the customer anymore

[-] Pulptastic@midwest.social 6 points 9 months ago

The relevant content of the article:

U.S. consumers are getting more budget-conscious, meaning they are eating at less-expensive restaurants and even ordering cheaper items when they go out.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2023
205 points (97.2% liked)

News

22831 readers
4165 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS