273
submitted 8 months ago by girlfreddy@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

"You must be a legal resident of Iowa and the precinct you live in and bring a photo ID with you to participate," the state Republican party said on Friday in a post on the social media platform X.

The party is scheduled to hold local gatherings, known as the Iowa Caucus, on Jan. 15 in which participants will vote for their choice for the Republican candidate to run in November’s presidential election. U.S. President Joe Biden is expected to be the Democratic Party’s nominee.

The state Republican Party posted its reminder after Casey DeSantis, appearing on Fox News with her husband, the governor of Florida, called on women from across the country to join the gatherings, saying, “You do not have to be a resident of Iowa to participate."

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Nobody@lemmy.world 113 points 8 months ago

Behind every dumb cardboard cutout of an alt right candidate is a suffering wife who has no idea what’s going on and just wants to order Thigh food.

[-] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 55 points 8 months ago
[-] bedrooms@kbin.social 8 points 8 months ago

To get the thigh massage

[-] LoraxEleven@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago

And has realized that she left nothing behind.... Other than compliance to Her Man...

Some like it like that, eh?

[-] DigitalTraveler42@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

The life of a pick me girl...

[-] littlebluespark@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

A variation on the ol' MRS degree.

[-] bedrooms@kbin.social 84 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Republicans: "We're attacked with illegal votes!"

De Santis wife: "Non-residents, vote for us."

Took me, a non-US citizen, a while to get the joke.

[-] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 14 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Sort of, poster left out the key quote that triggered the post from the Republican party:

"We are asking all of these moms and grandmoms to come from wherever it might be, North Carolina, South Carolina, and to descend upon the state of Iowa," said Casey DeSantis, who has been promoting a "Mamas for DeSantis" coalition as she campaigns for her husband.

So non-resident in this context would be out of state.

[-] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 28 points 8 months ago

It had its own penalty. Iowans don't like non Iowans participating in their caucus. He will definitely lose votes.

[-] BigilusDickilus@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

Yep my wife is an expatriate of Iowa, they are a surprisingly prickly people about outsiders.

[-] hydrospanner@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Other than the primaries, what else do they have?

Corn?

Let them have their thing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Drusas@kbin.social 28 points 8 months ago

Shitty that they have to bring photo ID, which poorer people disproportionately do not have.

[-] nixcamic@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

As a non American it's kinda wild that

A: you don't need ID to vote

B: not everyone has ID, like, how do you get a bank account or drive or go to school or change a cheque or get benefits or buy beer or anything?

C: getting an ID is so difficult that requiring one is controversial.

[-] roofuskit@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

ID is not issued by the federal government. It's typically issued at the state level. As far as the bank account goes, most poor Americans are locked out of the banking system. Many poor Americans cannot afford a car. Etc...

Here's a brief summary of the physical and financial obstacles. https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/challenge-obtaining-voter-identification

All this shit adds up. Then you have to understand the same people who have to jump through all these hoops for an ID likely have to way half a day in line to vote. The same people pushing for voter ID laws in the US are closing polling places in these people's neighborhoods to make it even more difficult. These are people who can't afford to take half a day to get ID or another half a day to wait in line to vote. Because the if they miss work they'll lose their job or be unable to make rent for the month.

People on the left are not opposed to voter ID requirements, we're opposed to implementing more burdens on people who already struggle with the logistics of voting.

Make the required identification 100% free and cover the costs of any documents and time needed to get it and I'm all for it. But barriers for legitimate voters are antidemocratic and a very dark part of US history.

[-] JustZ@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

ID is not required in my State. If you don't have ID, you can sign a sworn affidavit saying who you are and they have to let you vote with that.

Government needs to be able to trust the sworn statements of citizens, absent some articulable evidence why it should not be trusted. There should be no penalty for not having ID, if you don't have an ID and your affidavit is perjurious, the penalty still isn't not voting, it's a criminal charge for offering a false instrument; even if there is a state law on such ballot fraud, the penalty still isnt, like, recounting the vote and subtracting one (unless it's caught before it's certified), it's the criminal charge. Elections need to be short and sweet with a clear end result.

[-] JustZ@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

Some places hold a perfectly valid election and you don't even have to give your name, just show your finger, vote, and then dip your finger in a jar of ink on your way out.

Elections are not meant to be perfect and expecting perfection makes you a mark for election lies.

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

If voting day were a holiday it wouldn't be nearly as contraversial to require IDs, especially if ID offices were open those days.

[-] dwalin@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

As a non-us Citizen: why? Do you have to pay to get an ID?

[-] namelessdread@lemmy.world 19 points 8 months ago

In my state, it's $10 for a non-driver state issued ID card. However, the offices you need to visit in person have limited days and hours that they are open, meaning some people can't afford to take the time off of work to do so.

If for some reason they don't already have supporting identifying documents like a social security card, it could take multiple steps and visits.

[-] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 12 points 8 months ago

Minor fees for some. It's often the paperwork, time, proof of id, and locations that become the barrier. We don't have national IDs here, but use a stupid Social Security Number that was never designed for the purpose and is literally sequential at birth. This makes proof of identity a task.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] nadiaraven@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

Generally, yes. And sometimes you need an address, so it's more difficult if you're homeless

[-] JustZ@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Because rich people don't want to pay any taxes.

[-] netburnr@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Hinest question. Without ID how do you know who they are? How do you know they haven't already voted?

[-] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 3 points 8 months ago

The way Iowa does it, to my understanding, is they gather and a number of people speak in favor of candidates, and they take the poll live. So it’s a good evening at the polling site.

load more comments (29 replies)
[-] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 26 points 8 months ago

I'm usually not one to mock someone for their appearance, but people who bed with fascists get little sympathy from me.

Holy shit that makeup looks terrible.

[-] thefartographer@lemm.ee 12 points 8 months ago

(Most) People don't choose their faces, but do choose their makeup. I think you're ok on this one.

[-] frickineh@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

The first thing I did when I saw the thumbnail was google pictures of her to see if her makeup is always that bad. Turns out, it's almost never good, but this is a particularly bad look. Whoever does her makeup (maybe her) is doing so many things that make her look like a cartoon witch, which is kind of hilarious tbh, since she sucks.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] morphballganon@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Maybe it's because my phone is on the lowest brightness setting, but it looks much better to me than I was expecting after your comment.

Looked again with regular brightness, and aside from her being a little older, her makeup looks fine. Her nose looks a little weird, like it was redone surgically. But better than the airhead tan blonde fake-lipped bimbos you usually associate with republicans.

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

I feel like makeup is fair game because you did it to yourself. I make fun of my brother’s shitty tattoo because he chose poorly.

[-] Laalisaaa042@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago

I went to Google to see for myself and I found this article about her eyebrows https://slate.com/human-interest/2023/07/casey-desantis-eyebrows-sparked-important-national-debate.html

I would feel bad about her bad makeup if she wasn't so supportive of ol' pudding fingers

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.world 18 points 8 months ago

Dumb and Dumber.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2023
273 points (97.9% liked)

News

22488 readers
3951 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS