this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2024
914 points (98.6% liked)

News

36201 readers
2438 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Alendra 'Len' Harris says she feels validated by the judge's ruling, which she says also backs up the hundreds of similar allegations from other Starbucks workers around the country who have unionized in an effort to get better pay and working conditions.

all 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Stamau123@lemmy.world 162 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Should be backpay and a half at least to make it an actual deterrent, but whatever

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 114 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Back pay, interest. And a whopping fine.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 30 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Republicans are blocking the bill that would allow the NLRB to issue fines for ULPs.

And of course they are...

[–] phx@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago

Not to mention, re-hiring is kinda bullshit. Who's going to want to feel comfortable working at an employer that fucked them over once already?

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 140 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I'm sure she's going to have an excellent working environment and management that really appreciates her.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 102 points 2 years ago

Yeah, but good on her for fighting back.

I’ve been in a similar position, and can attest to it being something that takes a toll on your energy, mood, and health. The fact that she went to court and is going back is impressive as fuck.

[–] Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world 29 points 2 years ago

Some times being the martyr is genuinely useful. She made an achievement, and she isn't obligated to stay afterwards. She could have just moved on without fighting for justice.

[–] ReiRose@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

She only has to work one day to get her backpay

[–] TheDeepState@lemmy.world 57 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I wish the programming industry would unionize, but it's just not something I see happening any time soon if ever.

[–] Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Tech people love to think they don't need unions. Unfortunately.

[–] cmbabul@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

IT in general is the biggest industry that has risen to its level of prominence since the heyday of unions. We’ve all been conditioned to be in conflict/competition with our fellow IT workers and also that we’re easily replaceable. Couple that with it being a fairly safe in comparison to mining or factory work and you have the recipe for not unionizing. Ironically only the medical industry would bring the country to a halt with a strike faster than if every support tech, analyst, designer, and engineer walked off the job tomorrow

[–] wabafee@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I understand if Medical Industry just strikes could grind the country to a halt. But for a statement with IT not causing huge issue on day one if everyone in IT industry just strike. Good chance it will affect not just the Medical but also everything else. I think we're underestimating how integrated IT is in our society. Some of those 99.9% uptime servers are basically just 50/50 a day and can breakdown suddenly for little to no reason at all and someone not in the helm or on call to fix those could become a nightmare situation.

[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago

Not all of them, I'd love to have a union but it's just not likely to happen.

[–] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 33 points 2 years ago

Props to her and all the people fighting for better things. Unions have made some great gains last year.

[–] chocolateo@lemmy.world 31 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Starbucks is evil coffee for evil people

[–] Paddzr@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Not even good evil coffee!!!

[–] crsu@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

If you're going to have evil coffee, it should at least be good

[–] S_204@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

The e person in the article is extra evil for getting their job back!

[–] SapphironZA@lemmings.world 28 points 2 years ago

What about punitive payments to cover mental health, legal and financial costs related to the firing?

[–] Custoslibera@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This is the type of person I admire.

Hope she sticks it to them and the rest of her colleagues come to her defence.

[–] Muffi@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago

Yeah, she's a cool cookie

[–] MisterD@lemmy.ca 19 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Why couldn't Starbucks just ignore the just ignore the judge like they ignored the law?

[–] Stamau123@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

Video says they may appeal, which is the next best thing

[–] crsu@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Then they send in Judge Dredd because he is the law

[–] some_guy 17 points 2 years ago

By coincidence, I'm wearing a tshirt supporting Starbucks unionization from last night. It's the rainbow one.

Support here.

[–] nutsack@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago

shit coffee suffocating small coffee shops doing infinitely better work

[–] Dragonmind@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

Sounds like a case where they'll shut down the entire location and move across the street.