Yes I do.. hmm..
Emmi
That person is an anarchist, and if anything, is most likely just happy that an "authoritarian" leader is killed. Because why would one even do material analysis or have any critical support at the bare minimum?
Now Azza, the one who is mostly featured in this post. That person gets really offended that people aren't pouring their hearts out for Charlie Kirk or the United Healthcare CEO that got bagged. Goes on about morals and such for rich white people but when Iranian kids are bombed? Then it's worth it.
I'll keep this in mind from now on.
The thread this post was made in is about Ludwig and Michael Reeves traveling in China.
What are some good practices when reading? When I read, it takes a while. I've had times where I read a page up to 3-4 times before registering it and I don't know why. I feel like I am not doing something right.
My bad! I thought it'd fit nicely in the thumbnail. I'll put the text in the OP too.
~~I dunno why, but I can't add in the last picture, which has another user emphasizing on a silver lining in killing a bunch of school girls in Iran.~~
NVM I guess I had accidentally uploaded too much in a short time, was rate limited.
Anyway, a fun trivia for the user with the Australian flag. That user was angry and disgusted at the killing of the United Healthcare CEO and the killing of Charlie Kirk.
Really shows how important western lives are compared to the global south to these people.
gonna vote blue and then things will be back to normal! (for us) - liberals
Thank you for the link, it's helpful. Small question, is the link in the 15th source cited source broken? It keeps refreshing for me.
So-called “tankies” are supposedly “authoritarian” but imperialists don’t blink an eye when the empire justifies another aggressive and unprovoked military operation in a country thousands of miles away, when it coups other countries, when it puts sanctions on another country that result in the deaths of its citizens, and so on.
It was doubly frustrating because one person who took GREAT offense to the video, who also linked to wikipedia articles like the kidnapping of a Japanese director or the Malaysia assassination in 2017. When disputed on this, I was not allowed to talk about it because I was "some white dude in Iceland" and they however, was a child of a refugee from the Vietnam war(southern region I think?) and that there's generational trauma that somehow gives them higher authority on the opinion of this entire conversation. Who then proceeded to defend imperialism while at the same time saying they have issues with US imperialism. What am I to think about this? It was very confusing. Said person was American too.
I wasn't sure what to think of it myself, because well. I am not oppressed, I am white and living within the imperial core is a status of privilege no matter how well I am actually doing in life. Still though, that whole interaction still bothers me. Is it wrong?
ProleWiki has a good article on that here: https://en.prolewiki.org/wiki/Imperialism#Chinese_%E2%80%9Cimperialism%E2%80%9D
I also read https://en.prolewiki.org/wiki/Essay:State_Capital_vs._Finance_Capital:_Why_China_is_not_--_and_Cannot_Become_--_an_Imperial_Hegemon which I thought was a very good essay.




Feels like all of the ""international"" community is