MisterFrog

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

Kinda sounds like we agree.

What I mean is that the system wasn't legally "rigged", more than it already was morally so.

What I mean is that is wasn't "more" rigged than it already was in 2020.

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago

I do wonder how this could possibly save his stocks. Anyone who was dumping stocks of companies where he was involved isn't going to buy them back simply because he's cutting ties with Trump.

If anything this will make his stocks dive even further because now he won't even be able to get government contracts via corruption.

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm getting pretty tired of hearing people spout the copium that the election was "rigged" when it's the far more sinister complete capture by the monied class, first past the post, active voter suppression and gerrymandering, and loopholes allowing billionaires to fund the campaigns of whoever they choose.

The election wasn't rigged, the elections are barely democratic.

Same as in Singapore. Each election isn't fake, just set up to bring the PAP back to majority government without fail.

That being said, you really need to get rid of your voting machines, that is a really risky practice, and I'll grant it is possible those were hacked. (I'm assuming you're from the US). If you're okay with that possibility, then you also have to admit it was possible when Trump lost.

Voting machines are dumb.

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Thank you, this detail had me scratching my head. D≈1.56" makes so much more sense.

Not knowing the difference between circumference and thickness? Instant turn off.

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

The election wasn't rigged (in the sense you're hoping for, or that MAGAs were alleging for the 2020 election). On a federal level it's deeply broken because of state administration, voter suppression, loopholes allowing for billionaires to fund election campaigns and first past the post.

On a state level from what I can tell it's much the same with a few exceptions.

I kinda doubt Musk had to do anything illegal to influence the election.

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

I don't judge the individual, but I sure as hell judge them as a group, who keep voting for people who are doing genocide.

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Work forced our update and it's massively slowed down everyone's computers.

The IT guy gave me this knowing look when I came to ask if I could do anything about it.

Nope.

Bloody ridiculous because in terms of functionality it's a step backwards in many areas, some decent little improvements in very few areas, and overall trash performance.

Really wish they had paid for extended security updates.

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

And then there was light!

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

@gofsckyourself@lemmy.world who art in heaven, save us from this peril

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If we know each other, I'd tell you in a heartbeat. On the internet where someone will just vacuum it up into their dataset? Not a chance.

 

Engineering references that specify formulas with variables with specified units, instead of constants with defined units, are a travesty.

I refer to Crane Technical Paper 410 in this instance.

Why would I want

ΔP = 32000 μ L v/d^2 (for laminar flow)

You'd expect this to be a normal formula, which you do your own dimensional analysis, but no. Units are specified. But not even on the same page, no no, on a "nomenclature" page you have to know to look for.

ΔP in Pa

μ in cP

L in m

v in m/s

d in mm

When I could have

ΔP=32 μ L v/D²

and YOU use whatever units you want.

Hell I could even put imperial units in here if I were a masochist. Very upsetting.

Engineering textbooks/technical papers need to find Pure Math Jesus.

Formulas with hidden units? Not even once.

Crane TP 410. How could you?

 

Apparently 30 roses is $200 AUD ($126 USD).

Florists making a killing today.

38
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by MisterFrog@lemmy.world to c/fediverse@lemmy.world
 

I really want a Facebook (the old Facebook timeline) replacement, but end-to-end encrypted, and decentralised so there's longevity.

Edit for clarity: I'm looking for a way to share things online, end-to-end encrypted to a wide-audience that knows you but doesn't necessarily know each other.

This is why messaging apps don't fulfil this requirement, and chat rooms (like Matrix) also don't fit.


I love Lemmy, I like the idea of Mastodon (twitter-like sites just aren't my thing. ActivityPub rocks. However, none of them are encrypted.

PixelFed is neato, but I don't plan sharing my personal photos with the whole of the internet, which seems to be the only choice with ActivityPub.

Signal and other encrypted messaging apps are great, but are for direct messaging. Where are the encrypted social media apps?

Matrix is cool and all, but it's aimed at groups. Like discord / MS teams replacement.

Someone told me about Futo Circles, which seems to tick all the boxes and built on top of Matrix, but it's currently abandoned.

Are there any other alternatives? My wallet is open, I would very much like to use such an app. I am no programmer, so sadly cannot take on the mantle of continuing the Futo Circles project.

13
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by MisterFrog@lemmy.world to c/signal@lemmy.ml
 

I'm aware of how to set up chat backups on Android, but this only makes local backups that you have to manually upload or copy.

I'm trying to find a solution where I can set and forget backups to the cloud.

My requirements are:

  1. It doesn't require me exposing the rest of my file system/cloud storage to a third party app without scoping (filesync works, but doesn't meet this criteria).
  2. It can upload directly to a cloud service

So far, no dice :/

Is there some workaround?

P.S. my potential solution is move Signal to my Shelter Work profile, where I do have filesync installed, but then I won't have contacts access, which is a slight pain (and because I don't want to create contacts in my work profile).

 

@gofsckyourself@lemmy.world

 

Most recent example: I was asked to participate/lead our team's Movember campaign at my company.

How I politely declined: oh sorry, I'm a bit too busy with my personal life and work projects this year.

My unpopular opinion I couldn't say: it doesn't align with my values.

Movember raises money and promotes awareness of Men's health. Nothing wrong with the organisation themselves, but frankly I think the paltry couple of thousand of dollars our (pretty large) company manages to raise each year is a waste of time.

If we taxed corporations a fraction of a percent more on corporate profits we would bring is orders of magnitude more money than individuals asking others, out of the kindness of the hearts, for money.

Health research shouldn't have to beg for money, the government should just fund it with tax dollars. Taxes that you don't get to choose to pay. Other than by voting.

I hate fun runs, and do subtly judge those who participate in them, especially because (I think) they skew towards wealthier people, and it's their way of making themselves feel good for raising money for cancer or whatever, and then turn around and vote for tax cuts, and use accountants to make their tax liability as low as possible - something poorer people can't afford.

I used to give money to charity when I was younger. But I honestly think it's silly now, and it ought not have to exist.

(Mods, this is politics adjacent, but I feel is general enough to be compliant, since I'd say most people view charity organisations mostly favourably)

 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/21049862

The only numbers I will ever spell are one and zero, and only when using them as a pronoun, or for emphasis, respectively.

Is there ever a reason to not to use symbols when dealing with numbers? Why would "fourteen whatevers" ever be preferable to "14 whatevers". It's just so much easier to read numbers as symbols, not spelled out.

(Caveat, not including multipliers, like "273 billion").

 

The only numbers I will ever spell are one and zero, and only when using them as a pronoun, or for emphasis, respectively.

Is there ever a reason to not to use symbols when dealing with numbers? Why would "fourteen whatevers" ever be preferable to "14 whatevers". It's just so much easier to read numbers as symbols, not spelled out.

(Caveat, not including multipliers, like "273 billion").

 

How many times do you think about the Roman Empire per day?

view more: next ›