view the rest of the comments
the_dunk_tank
It's the dunk tank.
This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml
Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again
I skimmed some portion of Maria Franzblau Criticism of Cuba
https://reformandrevolution.org/2024/02/17/cuba-between-imperialism-and-socialism/
Most egregious considering the Palestinian genocide.
Having it both ways, the embargo is bad for the economy but also the threats that private business and austerity pose to the socialist economy
DAH POCS. like fr what do you mean?
https://reformandrevolution.org/2024/02/17/cuba-between-imperialism-and-socialism/
Like what?
edit:
You see, this good thing they did, is actually bad.
Earlier in the piece:
Another GOOD THING BAD
Her criticism at the end:
The criticism is self defeating. She clearly admits she had the opportunity to ask questions. Then she dismisses their wins for playing within their organizing conditions
edit:
More of Maria being able to ask questions and have a dialogue
She did not like his response, which is fair but did not provide proof of what she said either, which she certainly could have in a blog post.
Who the fuck do these people think they are?
NATO leftists who think that their identity as an American citizen makes their opinion worthwhile. Fucking hate these scum
Bootlicking catholic fucking church to own the ~~commies~~ "authoritarians" 🤡
she's more sympathetic to Miami gusanos than she is to Cuban revolutionaries. She wants to do tailism to appeal to gusanos and is worried that having solidarity with a socialist project would endanger her "organizing" among Cuban-Americans.
On Maykel Vivero:
https://www.memoryofnations.eu/en/gonzalez-vivero-maykel-1983
On Luis Manuel Otero Alcántara:
https://twitter.com/bellybeastcuba/status/1382680866439172103
edit:
https://www.telesurenglish.net/news/cuba-condemns-us-operation-in-havanas-san-isidro-20201129-0001.html
And there it is folks.
Gonna go down as an epic moment in DSA history, right up there with that time they let a cop run a branch.
Western chauvinist getting pissy that the know-nothing Cubans won’t listen to her enlightened sage advice.
Bonus points for engaging in![emoji parenti parenti](https://www.hexbear.net/pictrs/image/dba8728e-f43f-44ba-a5e1-0ce7270d07d9.png)
They literally just list off all of the State Department's current baddies as 'still bad but less bad than the US says they are'
Are they talking about that weak color revolution the US tried to stage a year or two back lmao? Where like half of the media came from people in the US? And the actual march in Cuba was pitifully small?
Fuckin being all "yes, these ~~former bourgeoisie who turned liberal because conservatives were too openly racist to them~~ disadvantaged former small business owners and their children deserve to be treated well" after insulting and then openly flouting the Cuban president, you know, actual socialists.
Pathetic or an OP.
"But" in Polish means "shoe", something that should be thrown at her.