810
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Fenrisulfir@lemmy.ca 57 points 3 months ago

Who the fuck prioritized efficiency over quality in their backyard garden?

My handmade solid maple and walnut furniture will never reach the yield or cost-effectiveness as IKEA. I guess I’ll just have to burn my shop down

[-] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 25 points 3 months ago

You are missing the point.

It's not about your shop. It's about everyone making their own furniture... which doesn't scale and isn't feasible.

[-] enbyecho@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago

This is a totally specious argument. Everyone doesn't have to make 100% of their own furniture any more than every one has to grow 100% of their food.

If I make two chairs it's more efficient than 1 chair and I only need to spend maybe 70% more time than 1, not 100% I sell/barter one chair to my neighbor, who, because they have grown 6 tomato plants instead of 4 (at most 10% more of their labor), has excess tomatoes and gives me some in exchange.

[-] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

Bro I think you are vastly overestimating the produce yield of a homegrown tomato plant let alone 6

[-] enbyecho@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

I'm curious if you have numbers on that or you are just assuming low yields.

I happen to know exactly how much a tomato plant grows because over 20 years of commercial farming I kept records. It varies a lot by variety and season and even how we are responding to market needs but in general I tend to get about 800-1400 lbs per 200 ft row for indeterminate tomatoes over the season. A farmer I know at lower elevation gets a lot more but they have a longer season, better soil and, crucially, water a lot more than we do -- my method cuts yield but increases quality. We use a 2 ft spacing for F1 varieties so that's about 100 plants (more like 95, but whatevs) so let's call it 8 pounds per plant = 48 lbs of tomatoes. Again, this is quite generalized and it's often way more. I also happen to know that's going to be on the very low end of home garden yields because people tell me this shit. Also, for cherry tomatoes you can get probably 60-70% more since they are very prolific.

[-] Shardikprime@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago

Bro we talking about a home garden here, where do you have that much space? and above all, time to do all that in your home? Not even counting the knowledge needed, fertilizer and soil and the fact that 90% of people starting this will drop it at the second week, it is still overestimating how much they will harvest at the end.

[-] enbyecho@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

I'm not your "bro".

I'm using examples from commercial small-scale farms because that shows what's possible when done correctly and by competent people, even at hand scale. I know many home gardeners who are extremely competent and frankly using the example of incompetent home gardeners or those who "drop it at the second week" compared to competent industrial farmers is completely disingenuous and wholly illogical.

the fact that 90% of people starting this will drop it at the second week,

[citation needed]

[-] Shardikprime@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago
[-] Peddlephile@lemm.ee 7 points 3 months ago

Two tomato plants far exceeded what we needed. We sacrificed the remainder to the possums and birds.

[-] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Right congratulations, you had 2 extra low iron and vitamin deficient mini tomatoes

[-] YIj54yALOJxEsY20eU@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

The harvest was too much, presumably not too much for the entire year.

[-] Welt@lazysoci.al 5 points 3 months ago

They might just be in a better climate than you! I had far more delicious sun-ripened tomatoes over the summer than I could eat. More than six plants to be fair, but most self-seeded anyway.

[-] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

exactly.

i've been gardening for years. it's a supplement. for like 1-2months i get nice produce that can feed a few people for a few weeks. but that's it. i maybe produce 20lbs of produce in a year if i'm lucky. that's over a dozen or two plants. i have a good sized garden of about 100 sq ft.

not to mention the weather any year could totally f you. one year we had three months of drought, so i got like 2lbs of tomatoes that year.

turns out i still buy like 95% of my produce from the grocery store... because it's available year round and it's hard to grow variety well unless you have multiple beds with differing soil and sun conditions.

most folks grow tomoatoes and cukes because they are easy and produce abundantly. but i am not going to live on tomatoes and cukes 365 days a year.

the space needed to grow squashes, berries, etc. is way way higher. you need a lot of land. and they are very low yield. a ten foot watermelon vine produces like maybe 1-2 melons per year and takes up 20 sq ft of garden space. a squash vine might produce 4-6 decent squash, etc. and a lot of veggies and plants are non complimentary, meaning they choke each other out if grown in proximity.

the only person i know who has a varied and big garden is an engineer who has spend five figures producing dozens of beds, water systems, and etc. and he still gets a shitty yield some years due to weather and he struggles constantly with rabbits, groundhogs stealing his crop. he has a whole trap and kill system for them even now. because the critters know he is the place to go for the tasty plants. most home gardening grow a few tomato plants and make some tomato sauce and throw a dinner party and that's the extent of their home gardening.

it's way more complex and difficult than some 'hrr drr just bring back victory gardens' nonsense. you're average person isn't going to be building a 1000sq ft veggie garden with fencing and dealing with all the part time job of labor and upkeep that it requires.

[-] YeetPics@mander.xyz 1 points 3 months ago

It scaled and was feasible before the industrialization of production.

I think you mean, you don't want it to scale or be feasible.

[-] Sethayy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

Funny enough 'efficiency' industrially tends to just mean what makes the most money anyways, so most crop's have been trained to be nutrient sparse, yet large

this post was submitted on 13 May 2024
810 points (91.9% liked)

Science Memes

9899 readers
2464 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Sister Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS