444
submitted 4 months ago by fukhueson@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Nougat@fedia.io 237 points 4 months ago

Headline suggests that the Democrats - who are currently more united than they've been since probably Kennedy - aren't united.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 32 points 4 months ago

If you think that's baffling, take a look at Nate Silver's column:

https://www.natesilver.net/p/tim-walz-is-a-minnesota-nice-choice

I'm not sure if Nate is talking about the same Walz and Shapiro as the rest of us.

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 38 points 4 months ago

Shapiro has Israel baggage that I am so glad I don't have to hear about online for the next forever. Kelly had a messy divorce that I'm sure nobody wants to have dredged up. Walz seems relatable to a great number of people.

Plus, he drives a 1979 IH Scout.

[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 13 points 4 months ago

Shapiro's Israel issue would have been a toss-up issue. Some independents wanted him to be very pro-Israel, others no so much. Probably wouldn't have made a huge difference.

On the other hand, might have made a difference in Michigan among the large muslim minority who may not have come out to vote.

I really just hope Walz is not going to be another Kaine.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 months ago

Democrats aren't the biggest fans of Israel right now. It's not independents that matter in his case.

[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 4 points 4 months ago

Democrats are very divided on Israel but lots are very pro-Israel. Most American Jews vote Democratic.

Doesn't mean they agree with Netanyahu's handling of Gaza, but pro-Israel nonetheless.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 months ago

Okay, but lots of Democrats won't vote for a pro-genocide administration. Someone who volunteered to be a soldier for their regime would have been seen as proof to them that Kamala was just as bad as Biden on Israel.

[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago

Wouldn't have mattered much when the alternative is Trump, which would be a thousand times worse than any candidate the Democrats could come up with.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 months ago

Not all Democrats will vote blue no matter who and Harris's pick seems to be an acknowledgement that she can't afford to piss off the uncommitted movement.

[-] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 24 points 4 months ago
[-] thisbenzingring 6 points 4 months ago

I remember listening to a podcast they would make, a lady and a guy and Nate Silver. I think it's that podcast that makes me not really like him or his ideas aside from the numbers and the team he surrounds himself with. I look at 538 and I trust it for the most part but if it has Silver attached to it, I think of it as editorial

[-] BedbugCutlefish@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

538 no longer has Nate Silver or his model; Disney bought it and fired him like a year ago or so.

Still, I agree; I don't like his politics, but his analysis of polls and numbers is probably the best out there.

[-] thisbenzingring 3 points 4 months ago

Haha that's funny, thanks for the update

[-] vividspecter@lemm.ee 9 points 4 months ago

He seems to have gotten more right-wing in recent years, although he doesn't talk about it too explicitly (maybe he was always like that and I just didn't know).

I remember him downplaying the J6 insurrection during one of the podcasts which was the point where I lost a lot of respect for him, and frankly him leaving isn't a big loss as he seemed to be just over election modelling in general by the end.

[-] skittle07crusher@sh.itjust.works 24 points 4 months ago

Lmao, Silver is equating a Walz pick to a TIM KAINE pick.

I’m sorry, I can’t read any further with sooo much cope.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 8 points 4 months ago

Yeah, it doesn't get much better. Silver's great when it's just about numbers, but less so when it's slightly more intangible. This column might be the peak example.

[-] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 12 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Hes Theil funded at this point. Dont expect a neutral voice anymore.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

You should read through the comments on that post.

Almost NONE of Silvers subscribers are having it.

This just a way off base miss of Silvers.

Believe the numbers, doubt the pundit.

[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

Silver's claim that Walz is a Tim Kaine pick is just dead on arrival. I'm sorry, I appreciate his actual model, but his argument here is just too speculative.

[-] BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

Yeah, I typically like Nate, but today's column seemed sloppy. I don't see how Walz is the "safe" choice - he's further left than Shapiro. I also didn't get what he was saying about Minnesota values not translating. I think Walz was a bold pick and I'm happy with the choice.

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

Seconded. Walz isn’t “safe” if you look at his policies. He’s pretty far left and is just fine implementing social policy, gun control, and using government money to fund social programs. That’s pretty radical if you’re a Republican. While he isn’t a policymaker as the VP, he’s a tie-breaker and he’s a future presidential candidate should Harris win.

[-] bitchkat@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

He doesn't even understand that "Minnesota Nice" is not a compliment. It refers to when people who have lived here their whole lives and have close often going back to high school. When someone from out of state moves to Minnesota, their co-workers, neighbors etc will be friendly, act interested in the newbs lives, and even offer things like "we should get together sometime". That is in no way an invitation to actually do anything. If the newb proposes a date "to get the kids together", the Minnesotan will hem, haw and make up excuses.

Minnesota Nice is a special kind of nice.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2024
444 points (97.2% liked)

News

23659 readers
3180 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS