this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2024
150 points (100.0% liked)

Slop.

540 readers
476 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/gossip

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
 

https://lemmy.ml/post/23269305

there was no good-faith and productive discussion to be had when you celebrate murder

how can you call others a tankie when you dance on graves as they do?

i have sympathy for the americans who are wronged by the man murdered but instead of violence maybe you consider reading a book to understand the world around you and be open to the power of faith to restore your love of humanity instead of parading violence

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Maturin@hexbear.net 75 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Jury nullification is a constitutional right of jurors. The idea that discussion of your own constitutional rights is a violation of the terms of service of a speech platform is pretty wild to me (or would be if I wasn't aware of what freeze-peach actually means in this country)

[–] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 36 points 6 months ago

Bootlicker gonna lick boot

Tale as old as time

[–] fox@hexbear.net 26 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Judges can declare mistrial if the jurors learn that it's an option during court and lawyers are essentially obligated to not tell the jurors they can do it

[–] Maturin@hexbear.net 17 points 6 months ago (1 children)

There are all sorts of constitutional rights the system wish didn’t exist.

[–] QuietCupcake@hexbear.net 13 points 6 months ago

Not really, tbh. The ones they don't like they just pretend don't exist, and most of the actually good ones are written ambiguously enough in the constitution itself that there's no problem weaseling around them.