this post was submitted on 06 May 2025
199 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

10133 readers
570 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

  2. Misinformation is not welcome here.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LiveLoveLaff@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (8 children)

This is a very fair question. The Cons screw Canada over quite regularly. Is there a way we can safe guard anything put into place.

[–] ninthant@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago (7 children)

My only idea would be a partnership with a province which would give the other veto power over any potential sale, along with a legal commitment that Canada would retain access to all IP in case of a sale.

[–] FreeBooteR69@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You would need a government in opposition provincially that was politically adverse to the federal government. If you end up with 2 conservative governments it's likely they wouldn't oppose one another ideologically.

[–] ninthant@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago

Yeah, that’s the rub.

The IP clause to allow Canada to rebuild it in case of that happening might poison any potential sale, and might discourage a province from wanting to sell if Canada would then rebuild in a new province?

But I’m just spitballing and have no idea if it even makes sense

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)