News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
view the rest of the comments
Just another tax on the poor and working class.
Did I miss something here? You could just not drive over a red light. Or are they shit and not working properly?
Its that the fines are fixed. For people who cant afford it an 80$ ticket means something else has to go. Your eating ramen and beans or your going to be late on a bill, and that may have additional fees. To those who can afford it, the 80$ ticket is the cost of a nice dinner you were going to anyway, its not impactful enough to change your behavior.
This is why in some nordic countries serious traffic violations fines are based on a % of your income. Plus taxes are high enough that the governentn does not rely on them as a primary revenue source.
While a reasonable point, it’s not really relevant here. Your argument applies generally to all fines , regardless whether there are red light cameras
Ok, that's a valid point. I like the concept of income dependent fines. The traffic lights in the USA are flawed in my opinion. In Europe, most of the time, the traffic light is directly behind the stopping line. Easy to see and react. I always found it inconvenient and not as easy when I was driving in the states. But that was only for a week and I was not completely used to them...
Yeah I have to admit to going through a red light about a year ago - it was a massive intersection (my side was 5 lanes) and the lights are misaligned so they’re not in front of the lanes they regulate.
The lights in front of me were green …… but they were for the right turning lanes, and lights for through lanes were off to the left. I can’t argue my fault but at the same time, wtf?
And in before “are you blind?” ….. yes I am. The lights did have arrows but the intersection was so big, the lights so far away on the opposite side of all that pavement that I didn’t notice until I was in the intersection.
Anyhow, the point is wtf , why does someone place lights where it increases the possibility of dangerous mistakes?
It's a tax on crap drivers.
That proportionally hits poor and middle class people harder than rich people.
They literally only set them up in the poor areas in town and not where the rich run red lights continuously.
Oh yeah rich people never travel through cities ever, you’re right, how could I forget?
??? Can't tell what's being said here. Sarcasm?They didn't put them in the areas of the city that the rich people travel through.
I’m not disagreeing with you, but rich people get caught by these traffic cameras as well. The fees just don’t sting as much for them because it’s a smaller percentage of their overall wealth.
It’s insult on top of injury that they target poor and middle class neighborhoods with these cameras.
That is true, but in this case they installed them in what were previously redline districts nearly exclusively, and nowhere near the business or government districts.
Bro I’m not disagreeing with you.
I think it’s silly to believe that not a single well-off person travels through those intersections ever though.
I never said that, and I'm also not disagreeing with you.
It hits people who go through red lights the hardest. No one is forcing anyone to run a red light.
And of those, the punishment is inversely proportional to their income.
Shit happens and this disproportionally punishes poor people harder.
Shit happens? Really? Running a red light at an intersection is shit happens?
You know you convinced me that this poor rich argument is stupid. Run a red light get ticket, don't run a red light don't get a ticket.
I don't recall running more lights depending on my wealth because I don't like to kill people.
The shit that shouldn't happen is not auditing any company running these things.
The problem with that logic is it’s already been demonstrated that it can be configured for profit rather than safety. We have no reason to trust these and every reason to expect that any ticket is capricious, possibly invalid, and a long after the fact enforcement so you won’t even be able to remember if you did it
It will not make anyone safer, just reduce trust in law enforcement even more, drive profit to some connected company, and be an unreasonable driving tax that will mostly hit those who can least afford it.
Speaking as someone who
I was really annoyed with the persons "shit happens" comment. Ok fuck it, shit happens, so do nothing is the wrong answer, and frankly I do not want to get T-boned in an intersection and I am not really concerned if the rich or poor are doing it. Fuck them both if they run red lights.
However, cameras do in fact make it safer. Statistics and studies have shown you have about a 20 percent reduction in side crashes, and of those you have about a 29 reduction in injuries. There also is a side effect where a camera at one light actually causes other intersections to be safer as people are not sure if there are cameras there.
So we know it improves safety.
We also know that several states had to pass additional laws or restrictions because vendors AND cities and counties were trying to force revenue by shortening the yellow light duration. So I can agree with you there, accountability matters.
Yet in two places, cities simply increased the yellow duration, which ALSO improved safety, and nearly as much. I think California passed a law to increase all yellows by another second.
So what is the take away: people are shitty. Poor people, government workers, vendors, rich people, they all have people that suck. I don't want to be in an accident. I really don't care what it takes, but I don't even know where to begin when I am driving in America and realize they a huge portion are rude dipshit morons who only seem to care about themselves. How can the society even function when they just don't care?
Look at it this way: If there are 2 crap drivers - one makes 500k/year and one makes 35k/year, which one is going to miss paying rent and going into debt due to a $200-$300 traffic ticket?
I'm all for having fines proportional to income rather than a fixed amount. You can also avoid it by not going through red lights.
When the private red light camera company was in my city, the camera company altered the yellow light timings shortening them when revenue fell so they could give people tickets. The red light camera company denied changing the timings for months. It took community action of someone standing with a stopwatch to catch them in a lie. The red light company was shut down.
Just to add, some of these companies are just assholes. I knew someone who got a ticket due to the fact he hydroplaned across a red light, it was either run the red or spinout of control. He ran the red and a deputy that witnessed the whole thing gave him a write off o the whole situation. Still got a ticket from the camera though, was easy to dismiss but if the cop hadn't been chill and put it in their system it would've been a bitch to dismiss.
This exact same thing happened to someone close to me except it was black ice instead of hydroplaning causing the slide. The red light camera ticket still stuck.
Agreed with not going through red lights, but there are definitely situations where it's safer to go through a pink light than slam on your brakes. In these cases, you're still getting punished by a camera.
We could get rid of all red lights if people drove better.
But that's not reality.
Be careful saying things like this ….. you’ll attract all roundabout fans saying it should be a goal to get rid of red lights
Have roundabout fans actually used roundabouts? People don't know how to use them lol
Yes, I use them all the time. They are fucking amazing.
You don't even have to use them in a country like the UK that has had them for a long time where people are used to them. Carmel, IN put roundabouts all over their part of Indianapolis (yes, I consider Carmel part of Indy and not its own city), and it took hardly any time for people to get used to them. The people that live their love them for the most part. Plainfield, IN also put roundabouts in more country road areas, and they are also great.
What's weird is when cities don't fully commit and put stoplights in the middle of a huge roundabout like in Inverness, Scottland.
I was being tongue-in-cheek.