Fuck AI

7623 readers

982 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

VerbFlow@lemmy.world

MrMcGasion@lemmy.world

TootSweet@lemmy.world

BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world

cynar@lemmy.world

drmeanfeel@lemmy.world

pavnilschanda@lemmy.world

CriticalMedicine@lemmy.world

WonderfulWanderer@lemmy.world

Communist@lemmy.ml

eatCasserole@lemmy.world

SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world

NutWrench@lemmy.world

Soup@lemmy.cafe

iAvicenna@lemmy.world

Tinks@lemmy.world

wizblizz@lemmy.world

corus_kt@lemmy.world

Prandom_returns@lemm.ee

JimSamtanko@lemm.ee

TrickDacy@lemmy.world

TheFriar@lemm.ee

ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com

HawlSera@lemm.ee

andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works

MeDuViNoX@sh.itjust.works

33550336@lemmy.world

Nougat@fedia.io

Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world

Quill7513@slrpnk.net

glowing_hans@sopuli.xyz

e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de

ThefuzzyFurryComrade@pawb.social

128

I noticed some changes in generative AI propaganda: fake centists, who promote "rational adaptation" (lemmy.world)

submitted 2 weeks ago by ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world

47 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Noticed some AI evangelists try with the same kind of fake centrism, that was pretty popular during the Gamergate era. In this case, they try to set up people spamming genAI slop against "fanatical anti-AI people". But just as many loves to pretend moderates are "far-left", as their past-Gamergate selves pretended Anita Sarkeesian demanded state censorship of sexist videogames, as they are now pretending Hasan Piker is the most radical leftist living today (there are much worse even within the content creator sphere, such as Badempanda) to illustrate the "horseshoe theory", the table is tilted in favor of AI adoption.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

local AI trained only on data willingly provided for that purpose by its creators and in an environment where there is Universal Basic Income and good quality free Adult Education, has almost zero ethical concerns.

Yeah, and living in a fantasy castle made of clouds in Imagination Land has no ethical concerns either, what's your point?

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

People losing jobs to AI is also an ethical concern, not just the sourcing of the data for training AI or the dependency on 3rd parties (i.e. non-local).

One one side, that means that for some kinds of Machine Learning were the other ethical concerns do not apply, there are still ethical concerns against their use.

On the other side, if that one too was addressed, then the whole "artists are loosing their jobs" concern might become a non-issue (practicing Art as a job is generally a "have to" situation, not a "chose to") at which point some further kinds of ML would be acceptable.

A blanket "X is bad, period!" rejection of all Machine Learning is simplistic and reductionist.