Technology
News community around technology, social media platforms, information technology and governmental policy surrounding it.
What doesn't fit here?
The core of the story has to be technology focused.
- If article mentions "AI" in a sentence and then talks about business economics that doesn't make it tech news.
- Gaming is too many layers removed from technology. There are many dedicated communities that are a better fit for it.
- Transporation is too many layers removed from technology. EVs while use many cool technologies have many dedicated communities that are a better fit for it.
- Entertainment is too many layers removed from technology. While sometimes it can fit here, business or cultural aspects of it are a better fit for dedicated communities.
- Cybersecurity. While it heavily focuses on technology, most of the time it's too technical for most people who are not already invested in it. Should be posted in a dedicated communities unless it has broader connection to other tech areas.
Post guidelines
Title format
Post title should mirror the news source title. If you don't like the title of article, look for an alternative source instead of editorializing it.
URL format
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefix
Opinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title. Opinion articles refer to articles that their publisher doesn't explictly endorse.
Country prefix
Country prefix can be added to the title with a separator (|, :, etc.) if the news is from a local publisher who doesn't clearly mention the country.
Rules
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original link
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communication
All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. Inclusivity
Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacks
Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangents
Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may apply
If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.
Companion communities
!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip
Icon attribution | Banner attribution
If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.
view the rest of the comments
Why would you use microsoft Authenticator anyway? There are other options
When you are using your phone for your work you don't really have the choice.
If it's work provided sure. But if its your own device then fuck them, not installing that shit on my own device. Provide one for me
I had a yubikey as my hardware authentication, then a coworkers email got hacked so IT moved us all to Microsoft authenticator, so now I have a less secure login method LOL
I had to use it for my work. They required MS authenticator. I think it's bullshit and tried to export my 2fa to bitwarden. I couldn't. And to add another 2fa .method I need to call support so I gave it up
They don't let you use https://mysignins.microsoft.com/ to replace/add MFA methods? That site was very useful at my last employer, as I was switching phones often.
Guessing IT can mandate which MFA options are available for users to choose
Some organizations require authenticator; they don't just use it for MFA codes, it's goes deeper than that.
Also, most large enterprise fall for the stupid Microsoft trap. They buy enterpise licensing in bulk (E3, E5, whatever) and bosses who have no brains will say "well, let's use more microsoft products since they're 'free'". The trap is that, yes, your enterprise license agreement includes entitlements to a lot of their stuff, but they nickle and dime you on stupid shit like the storage so you can keep the logging and telemetry data you typically need for security, troubleshooting and some audit requirements.
I can't imagine ever using any of their shit beyond Office products. Their security software is crap compared to most offerings, they still seem to think that networks are bad so we should do as little as possible about them. Azure is just a completely uncontrollable money drain (by design) that is damn near impossible to secure properly once you give developers enough access to actually do their jobs.
I've been working in security for a long time now and they continue to be such a fucking liability and drain on money at every turn. If I ran the zoo, I would switch the entire enteprise to Linux and find just about any other collaboration suite to use.
Fuck Excel and fuck you if all you do with it is make lists. Fuck powerpoint and fuck every boss who is too dumb to read and only can accept information when it is spoon fed to them in a deck. Word is OK, but nobody reads anymore so what's the point?
Work
I don't really mind using shit software on work devices. Yes it's slow and inefficient, I spent half an hour today on Windows doing what would be a very short command on Linux. Fuck it, get paid the same. I just use Linux at home in my own time.
I'll point out better software exists. If I don't get support in changing it or allowed to change it, fuck it. It's on them at that point.
You can use other authenticators. I use ente auth for my microsoft account
My work MS account requires MS authenticator specifically, can't use another 2fa app
Only if the company supports OTP methods for Entra login (logging in to M365 account).
But I'd say most don't anymore, as there has been a push towards Microsoft Authenticators push-method for a while (where the website/app shows a number and you have to type it in to the authenticator), as it is a slightly safer method than OTP, and can be used passwordless.
It also made people ready for passkeys, as the authenticator supports easy activation off passkey on accounts that are saved with push-method (you pretty much just click a button in the app), and authenticator is easy to set up on the admin side if you require device bound and attestation for passkey.
I can't. The authenticator for my job was set up on my work device by my IT department.
If your work requires you to have a Microsoft Authenticator-compatible device, they should provide you with one.
Which would never be rooted or jailbroken in the first place so why even bring it up in this this context?
Because I also have my normal phone as a backup for this purpose in case out in the field something happens to my work phone. And my personal phone is rooted.
Oh yeah I get it, I was mostly answering the "why bring it up", since this whole chain of comments started because of the comment I quoted.
Sucks to have that. Have you tried asking IT if you could use a different one?
The main problem as I see it is if I have to download authenticator onto my personal device because something has happened to my work device. That's the only way I could see this being a problem since I use Graphene OS on my personal phone. Even then I would probably just use the authenticator on my work computer rather than going to that trouble.
That sucks. I refused so they gave me a Yubikey instead.
I have a yubikey (two actually, one from a previous employer). New company won't actually let me use it.
Depends on how your M365 tenant is configured. Both conditional access policies and authentication strengths can enforce the requirement
Then stop working for retards who support Nazis
I like the energy. But you took that from a 4 to a 10 fast.
You don't need it for work. You can use any authenticator.
It depends…. Your company IT department can choose what types of 2FA are available to use and Microsoft Authenticator is separate from OTP and other methods, and it is possible to restrict them.
That’s also yet another reason why I force the issue of a company phone as part of my equipment to do my job.
Work isn't an excuse unless your work is trying to cut corners by having you use your personal phone instead of providing a work one. In which case they deserve to be taught this lesson for being cheap as fuck.
Your IT should be issuing you a phone handled by MDM, which should be locked down and not allow you to use a rooted or jailbroken device anyway.
my company IT can provide a phone
no work software is ever touching a personal phone
and work phones get shut off at closing
IIRC if you use M365 (i.e. Outlook), you can only use their authenticator app for MFA. Happy to be corrected though.
Aegis works fine, as long as your organization allows standards compliant authenticators.
M365 can be used with other 2fa apps. But organisations can force the use of Microsoft Authenticator
Nope, the Microsoft authenticator is slightly different, and other authenticators won't work. I just went through this with my IT dep. Microsoft authenticator will sometimes pop the numbers up on the computer and make you enter it in the app, not the other way around.
This change is really more about enterprise use cases. If you take DLP seriously you need to make sure the integrity of the controls on work provided devices are intact. Authenticator isn't managed by intune since users could use it for many things.
Nothing stops someone taking a photo of another screen. It's not a panacea. It's just one more hurdle.
Yup, I use Aegis, and found a strange little trick with Bitwarden Authenticator where I can import them into the main app (the Vaultwarden server). I know keeping all my power in one place defeats the purpose of 2FA but you know, I trust Vaultwarden, and myself to keep it secure, implicitly.
people likely using workday as for a job probably, or any app that uses MS.
Ugh, fuck workday