this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2026
133 points (95.9% liked)

Fuck AI

5369 readers
1379 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Inspired by a recent talk from Richard Stallman.

From Slashdot:

Speaking about AI, Stallman warned that "nowadays, people often use the term artificial intelligence for things that aren't intelligent at all..." He makes a point of calling large language models "generators" because "They generate text and they don't understand really what that text means." (And they also make mistakes "without batting a virtual eyelash. So you can't trust anything that they generate.") Stallman says "Every time you call them AI, you are endorsing the claim that they are intelligent and they're not. So let's let's refuse to do that."

Sometimes I think that even though we are in a "FuckAI" community, we're still helping the "AI" companies by tacitly agreeing that their LLMs and image generators are in fact "AI" when they're not. It's similar to how the people saying "AI will destroy humanity" give an outsized aura to LLMs that they don't deserve.

Personally I like the term "generators" and will make an effort to use it, but I'm curious to hear everyone else's thoughts.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kirk@startrek.website 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

I'm curious why you used said "LLM" in your reply? If you feel highlighting a distinction isn't important why not just say "AI" again?

[–] geekwithsoul@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It wasn't an example, it was a pointer in time to before the advent of LLMs as I was discussing popular conceptions of what AI meant before we got it even more wrong recently.

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 1 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

But why are you continuing to refer to "AI" as "LLMs"? If you believe the very act of even making a distinction between "AI" and "LLMs" is orthagonal?

[–] geekwithsoul@piefed.social 1 points 20 hours ago

You seem very confused. So I can better understand what you're asking, can you quote from what I wrote what reads to you as if I'm calling AI by "LLMs"